Quality of feedback in higher education: A review of literature

Education Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2020, Pages

  Haughney, Kathryn ^a   Wakeman, Shawnee ^b   Hart, Laura ^b  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Higher education; Literature review; Quality feedback; Teacher preparation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85081211316     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22277102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/educsci10030060     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Worthen, M. The Misguided Drive to Measure ‘Learning Outcomes’; New York Times: New York, NY, USA, 2018. p. SR 1. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/23/opinion/sunday/colleges-measure-learning-outcomes.html (accessed on 15 December 2019).
2. Knight, S.L.; Lloyd, G.M.; Arbaugh, F.; Gamson, D.; McDonald, S.P.; Nolan, J., Jr.; Whitney, A.E. Performance assessment of teaching: Implications for teacher education. J. Teach. Educ. 2017, 65, 372–374. [CrossRef]
3. Price, T.A. Teacher education under audit: Value-added measures, TVAAS, edTPA and evidence-based theory. Citizsh. Soc. Econ. Educ. 2014, 13, 211–225. [CrossRef]
4. Cochrane-Smith, M.; Piazza, P.; Power, C. The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. Educ. Forum 2013, 77, 6–27. [CrossRef]
5. Sato, M. What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA? J. Teach. Educ. 2014, 65, 421–434. [CrossRef]
6. Burns, B.; Henry, J.; Lindauer, J. Working together to foster candidate success on the edTPA. J. Inq. Action Educ. 2015, 6, 18–37.
7. Hart, L.C.; Wakeman, S. Creating faculty buy-in for edTPA and other performance-based assessments. In Evaluating Teacher Education Programs through Performance-Based Assessments; Polly, D., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 80–92.
8. Davis, T.S.; Mountjoy, K.J.; Palmer, E.L. Creating an instructional framework to prepare teacher education candidates for success on a performance-based assessment. J. Res. Bus. Educ. 2016, 57, 1–13.
9. Evans, C. Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Rev. Educ. Res. 2013, 83, 70–120. [CrossRef]
10. McCarthy, J. Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues Educ. Res. 2015, 25, 153–169.
11. Gibbs, G.; Simpson, C. Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learn. Teach. High. Educ. 2005, 1, 3–31.
12. Brookhart, S.M. How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students, 2nd ed.; ASCD: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2017.
13. Carless, D. Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. High. Educ. 2015, 69, 963–976. [CrossRef]
14. Carless, D.; Boud, D. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 1315–1325. [CrossRef]
15. Lunt, T.; Curran, J. ‘Are you listening please?’ The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2010, 35, 759–769. [CrossRef]
16. Macgregor, G.; Spiers, A.; Taylor, C. Exploratory evaluation of audio email technology in formative assessment feedback. Res. Learn. Technol. 2011, 19, 39–59. [CrossRef]
17. Kisnanto, Y.P. The effect of written corrective feedback on higher education students’ writing accuracy. J. Pendidik. Bhs. Dan Sastra 2016, 16, 121–131. [CrossRef]
18. Williams, J.B.; Jacobs, J.S. Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2004, 20, 232–247. [CrossRef]
19. Xie, Y.; Ke, F.; Sharma, P. The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. Internet High. Educ. 2008, 11, 18–25. [CrossRef]
20. Hattie, J.; Timperley, H. The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 2007, 77, 81–112. [CrossRef]
21. Van den Berg, I.; Admiraal, W.; Pilot, A. Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teach. High. Educ. 2006, 11, 135–147. [CrossRef]
22. Minehart, R.D.; Rudolph, J.; Pian-Smith, M.C.; Raemer, D.B. Improving faculty feedback to resident trainees during a simulated caseA randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention. Anesth. J. Am. Soc. Anesth. 2014, 120, 160–171.
23. Hebert, B.G.; Vorauer, J.D. Seeing through the screen: Is evaluative feedback communicated more effectively in face-to-face or computer-mediated exchanges? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2003, 19, 25–38. [CrossRef]
24. Plakht, Y.; Shiyovich, A.; Nusbaum, L.; Raizer, H. The association of positive and negative feedback with clinical performance, self-evaluation and practice contribution of nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today 2013, 33, 1264–1268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. McCarthy, J. Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Act. Learn. High. Educ. 2017, 18, 127–141. [CrossRef]
26. Wilkins, E.A.; Shin, E.K.; Ainsworth, J. The effects of peer feedback practices with elementary education teacher candidates. Teach. Educ. Q. 2009, 36, 79–93.
27. Huxham, M. Fast and effective feedback: Are model answers the answer? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2007, 32, 601–611. [CrossRef]
28. Lynam, S.; Cachia, M. Students’ perceptions of the role of assessments at higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 223–234. [CrossRef]
29. Mathisen, P. Video feedback in higher education—A contribution to improving the quality of written feedback. Nord. J. Digit. Lit. 2012, 7, 97–113.
30. Gould, J.; Day, P. Hearing you loud and clear: Student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 38, 554–566. [CrossRef]
31. Hennessy, C.; Forrester, G. Developing a framework for effective audio feedback: A case study. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 39, 777–789. [CrossRef]
32. Miller, T. Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: The effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2009, 34, 181–192. [CrossRef]
33. Bloxham, S.; Campbell, L. Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2010, 35, 291. [CrossRef]
34. Sopina, E.; McNeill, R. Investigating the relationship between quality, format and delivery of feedback for written assignments in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2015, 40, 666. [CrossRef]
35. Poulos, A.; Mahony, M.J. Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2008, 33, 143–154. [CrossRef]
36. Dawson, P.; Henderson, M.; Mahoney, P.; Phillips, M.; Ryan, T.; Boud, D.; Molloy, E. What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 1–12. [CrossRef]
37. Mulliner, E.; Tucker, M. Feedback on feedback practice: Perceptions of students and academics. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 266–288. [CrossRef]
38. O’Donovan, B.; Rust, C.; Price, M. A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2016, 41, 938–949. [CrossRef]
39. Orrell, J. Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teach. High. Educ. 2006, 11, 441–456. [CrossRef]
40. Stern, L.A.; Solomon, A. Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled. Assess. Writ. 2006, 11, 22–41. [CrossRef]
41. Hounsell, D.; McCune, V.; Hounsell, J.; Litjens, J. The quality of guidance and feedback to students. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2008, 27, 55–67. [CrossRef]
42. Hyland, K. Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 2013, 22, 240–253. [CrossRef]
43. Weaver, M.R. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2006, 31, 379–394. [CrossRef]
44. Carless, D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Stud. High. Educ. 2006, 31, 219–233. [CrossRef]
45. Ferguson, P. Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2011, 36, 51–62. [CrossRef]
46. Brandt, C. Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. Elt. J. 2008, 62, 37–46. [CrossRef]
47. Zhou, J.; Deneen, C.C. Chinese award-winning tutors’ perceptions and practices of classroom-based assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2016, 41, 1144–1158. [CrossRef]
48. Liu, N.F.; Carless, D. Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teach. High. Educ. 2006, 11, 279–290. [CrossRef]
49. Liu, E.Z.F.; Lin, S.S. Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2007, 38, 1122–1125. [CrossRef]
50. Ertmer, P.A.; Richardson, J.C.; Belland, B.; Camin, D.; Connolly, P.; Coulthard, G.; Mong, C. Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2007, 12, 412–433. [CrossRef]
51. Bayerlein, L. Students’ feedback preferences: How do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2014, 39, 916–931. [CrossRef]
52. Eddington, K.; Foxworth, T. Dysphoria and self-focused attention: Effects of feedback on task strategy and goal adjustment. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 31, 933–951. [CrossRef]
53. Debuse, J.C.; Lawley, M.; Shibl, R. Educators’ perceptions of automated feedback systems. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2008, 24, 374–386. [CrossRef]
54. Han, J.; Finkelstein, A. Understanding the effects of professors’ pedagogical development with clicker assessment and feedback technologies and the impact on students’ engagement and learning in higher education. Comput. Educ. 2013, 65, 64–76. [CrossRef]
55. Ajjawi, R.; Boud, D. Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 1106–1119. [CrossRef]
56. Wu, R. Feedback in Distance Education: A Content Analysis of Distance Education, a Doctoral Dissertation from Proquest Diss. Theses Glob. Available online: https://librarylink.uncc.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.librarylink.uncc.edu/docview/1905845256?accountid=14605 (accessed on 1 August 2018).
57. Adcroft, A. The mythology of feedback. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2011, 30, 405–419. [CrossRef]
58. Bailey, R.; Garner, M. Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teach. High. Educ. 2010, 15, 187–198. [CrossRef]
59. Barker, M.; Pinard, M. Closing the feedback loop? Iterative feedback between tutor and student in coursework assessments. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2014, 39, 899. [CrossRef]
60. Beaumont, C.; O’Doherty, M.; Shannon, L. Reconceptualizing assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Stud. High. Educ. 2011, 36, 671–687. [CrossRef]
61. Beck, D.E. Performance-Based Assessment: Using pre-established criteria and continuous feedback to enhance a student’s ability to perform practice tasks. J. Pharm. Pract. 2000, 13, 347–364. [CrossRef]
62. Boronat-Navarro, M.; Forés, B.; Puig-Denia, A. Assessment feedback in higher education: Preliminary results in a course of strategic management. Ed. Univ. Politècnica De València 2015. [CrossRef]
63. Broadbent, J.; Panadero, E.; Boud, D. Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 307–322. [CrossRef]
64. Callahan, T.J.; Strandholm, K.; Dziekan, J. Developing an undergraduate assessment test: A mechanism for faculty feedback about retention. J. Educ. Bus. 2009, 85, 45–49. [CrossRef]
65. Chen, X.; Breslow, L.; Deboer, J. Analyzing productive learning behaviors for students using immediate corrective feedback in a blended learning environment. Comput. Educ. 2018, 117, 59–74. [CrossRef]
66. Cole, D. Constructive criticism: The role of student-faculty interactions on African American and Hispanic students’ educational gains. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 2008, 49, 587–605. [CrossRef]
67. Cooper, N.J. Facilitating learning from formative feedback in level 3 assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2000, 25, 279–291. [CrossRef]
68. Carruthers, C.; McCarron, B.; Bolan, P.; Devine, A.; McMahon-Beattie, U.; Burns, A. ‘I like the sound of that’—An evaluation of providing audio feedback via the virtual learning environment for summative assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2015, 40, 352. [CrossRef]
69. Dowden, T.; Pittaway, S.; Yost, H.; McCarthy, R. Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 38, 349. [CrossRef]
70. Esterhazy, R. What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 1302–1314. [CrossRef]
71. Fernández-Toro, M.; Truman, M.; Walker, M. Are the principles of effective feedback transferable across disciplines? A comparative study of written assignment feedback in languages and technology. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 38, 816. [CrossRef]
72. Garrison, D.R.; Anderson, T.; Archer, W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2000, 2, 87–105. [CrossRef]
73. Gleaves, A.; Walker, C. Richness, redundancy or relational salience? A comparison of the effect of textual and aural feedback modes on knowledge elaboration in higher education students’ work. Comput. Educ. 2013, 62, 249–261. [CrossRef]
74. Glover, C.; Brown, E. Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Biosci. Educ. 2006, 7, 1–16. [CrossRef]
75. Hamer, J.; Purchase, H.; Luxton-Reilly, A.; Denny, P. A comparison of peer and tutor feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2015, 40, 151–164. [CrossRef]
76. Heckman-Stone, C. Trainee preferences for feedback and evaluation in clinical supervision. Clin. Superv. 2004, 22, 21–33. [CrossRef]
77. Higgins, R.; Hartley, P.; Skelton, A. Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teach. High. Educ. 2001, 6, 269–274. [CrossRef]
78. Higgins, R.; Hartley, P.; Skelton, A. The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud. High. Educ. 2002, 27, 53–64. [CrossRef]
79. Huisman, B.; Saab, N.; van Driel, J.; van den Broek, P. Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 955–968. [CrossRef]
80. Ibabe, I.; Jauregizar, J. Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. High. Educ. 2010, 59, 243–258. [CrossRef]
81. Ice, P.; Curtis, R.; Phillips, P.; Wells, J. Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 2007, 11, 3–25. [CrossRef]
82. Jessop, T.; El Hakim, Y.; Gibbs, G. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: A large-scale study of students’ learning in response to different programme assessment patterns. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2014, 39, 73. [CrossRef]
83. Lin, S.S.; Liu, E.Z.F.; Yuan, S.M. Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2001, 17, 420–432. [CrossRef]
84. Lizzio, A.; Wilson, K. Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2008, 33, 263–275. [CrossRef]
85. Lundberg, C.A.; Schreiner, L.A. Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 2004, 45, 549–565. [CrossRef]
86. Mirador, J.F. A move analysis of written feedback in higher education. RELC J. 2000, 31, 45–60. [CrossRef]
87. Murillo-Zamorano, L.; Montanero, M. Oral presentations in higher education: A comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 138–150. [CrossRef]
88. Nicol, D.; Thomson, A.; Breslin, C. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2014, 39, 102–122. [CrossRef]
89. Nordrum, L.; Evans, K.; Gustafsson, M. Comparing student learning experiences of in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback: Strategies for formative assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 38, 919–940. [CrossRef]
90. Orsmond, P.; Merry, S. The importance of self-assessment in students’ use of tutors’ feedback: A qualitative study of high and non-high achieving biology undergraduates. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 38, 737. [CrossRef]
91. Parboteeah, S.; Anwar, M. Thematic analysis of written assignment feedback: Implications for nurse education. Nurse Educ. Today 2009, 29, 753–757. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
92. Parkes, M.; Fletcher, P. A longitudinal, quantitative study of student attitudes towards audio feedback for assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 1046–1053. [CrossRef]
93. Parkin, H.J.; Hepplestone, S.; Holden, G.; Irwin, B.; Thorpe, L. A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2012, 37, 963. [CrossRef]
94. Pelgrim, E.A.M.; Kramer, A.W.M.; Mokkink, H.G.A.; Van der Vleuten, C.P.M. Reflection as a component of formative assessment appears to be instrumental in promoting the use of feedback; an observational study. Med Teach. 2013, 35, 772–778. [CrossRef]
95. Perera, J.; Lee, N.; Win, K.; Perera, J.; Wijesuriya, L. Formative feedback to students: The mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations. Med Teach. 2008, 30, 395–399. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
96. Pitt, E.; Norton, L. ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 499–516. [CrossRef]
97. Price, M.; Handley, K.; Millar, J.; O’Donovan, B. Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2010, 35, 277–289. [CrossRef]
98. Quinton, S.; Smallbone, T. Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning—A teaching model. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2010, 47, 125–135. [CrossRef]
99. Robinson, S.; Pope, D.; Holyoak, L. Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2013, 38, 260–272. [CrossRef]
100. Tang, S.Y.F.; Chow, A.W.K. Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2007, 23, 1066–1085. [CrossRef]
101. Tang, J.; Harrison, C. Investigating university tutor perceptions of assessment feedback: Three types of tutor beliefs. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2011, 36, 583–604. [CrossRef]
102. Timmers, C.F.; Braber-Van Den Broek, J.; Van Den Berg, S.M. Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Comput. Educ. 2013, 60, 25–31. [CrossRef]
103. Usher, M.; Barak, M. Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: Comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 745–759. [CrossRef]
104. Van Steendam, E.; Rijlaarsdam, G.; Sercu, L.; Van den Bergh, H. The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL. Learn. Instr. 2010, 20, 316–327. [CrossRef]
105. Van der Pol, J.; Van den Berg, B.A.M.; Admiraal, W.F.; Simons, P.R.J. The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Comput. Educ. 2008, 51, 1804–1817. [CrossRef]
106. Van Ginkel, S.; Gulikers, J.; Biemans, H.; Mulder, M. Fostering oral presentation performance: Does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peers guided by tutor? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 953–966. [CrossRef]
107. Vickerman, P. Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2009, 34, 221–230. [CrossRef]
108. Walker, M. An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2009, 34, 67. [CrossRef]
109. Walker, M. The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2015, 40, 23. [CrossRef]
110. Wei, W.; Yanmei, X. University teachers’ reflections on the reasons behind their changing feedback practice. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2017, 43, 867–869. [CrossRef]
111. Wingate, U. The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2010, 35, 519. [CrossRef]
112. Zhang, L.; Zheng, Y. Feedback as an assessment for learning tool: How useful can it be? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 1120–1143. [CrossRef]