Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 240-253

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Academic literacy; Disciplinary writing; Feedback; Tutor perceptions; Writing to learn

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879426746     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. English for specific purposes in theory and practice 2009, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. D. Belcher (Ed.).
2. Berg I., Admiraal W., Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2006, 31(1):19-36.
3. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17(2):102-118.
4. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System 2009, 37(2):322-329.
5. Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 2006, 32(2):219-233.
6. Currie P. Entering a disciplinary community: Conceptual activities required to write for one introductory university course. Journal of Second Language Writing 1993, 2(2):101-117.
7. English F. Student writing and genre: Reconfiguring academic knowledge 2011, Continuum, London.
8. Ferris D. Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 1995, 29(1):33-53.
9. Ferris D. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues 2006, 81-104. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
10. Ferris D., Roberts B. Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10(3):161-218.
11. Gimenez J. Beyond the academic essay: Discipline-specific writing in nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2009, 7(3):151-164.
12. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(1):81-112.
13. Hirvela A. Writing-to-learn in content areas: Research insights. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 37-60. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
14. Hyland F. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998, 7(3):255-286.
15. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing 2004, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
16. Hyland K. Genre and second language writing 2004, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
17. Hyland K. English for academic Purpose: An advanced resource book 2006, Routledge, London.
18. Hyland K. Learning to write: Issues in theory, research and pedagogy. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 17-36. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
19. Hyland, K. (submitted). Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback.
20. Academic discourse across disciplines 2006, Peter Lang, Frankfort. K. Hyland, M. Bondi (Eds.).
21. Ivanic R., Clark R., Rimmershaw R. What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors' written comments. Student writing in higher education: New contexts 2000, 47-65. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK. M. Lea, B. Stierer (Eds.).
22. Krause K.L., Hartley R., James R., McInnis C. The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies 2005, http://www.griffith.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0006/37491/FYEReport05.pdf. Accessed 04.09.12.
23. Lea M., Street B.V. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education. Student writing in higher education: New contexts 2000, 32-46. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham. M. Lea, B. Stierer (Eds.).
24. Lee I. Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17(2):69-85.
25. Leki I. Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development 2007, Lawrence Earlbaum, New York, NY.
26. Lillis T. Student writing: Access, regulation, desire 2001, Routledge, London.
27. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
28. Manchón R.M. Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 3-14. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
29. Nesi H., Gardner S. Genres across the disciplines. Student writing in Higher education 2011, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
30. Nuemann R., Parry S., Becher T. Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education 2002, 27(issue):405-413.
31. Ortega L. Reflections on the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of second language writing. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 237-250. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
32. Polkinghorne D. Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education 1995, 8(1):5-23.
33. Price M., Handley K., Millar J., O'Donovan B. Feedback: All that effort but what is the effect?. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2010, 35(3):277-289.
34. Analyzing Academic Writing 2004, Continuum. L.J. Ravelli, R.A. Ellis (Eds.).
35. Sternglass M. Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level 1997, Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
36. Truscott J. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16(4):255-272.
37. Truscott J. Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 2009, 18:59-60.
38. Truscott J., Hsu A.Y.P. Error correction revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17(4):292-305.
39. Villamil O., de Guerrero M. Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding socio-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues 2006, 23-41. CUP, Cambridge. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
40. Wardle E. Mutt genres and the goal of FYC: Can we help students write the genres of the university?. College Composition and Communication 2009, 60(4):765-789.
41. Weaver M. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2006, 31(3):379-394.
42. Wingate U. Using Academic Literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A 'literacy' journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2012, 11(1):26-37.