The importance of self-assessment in students' use of tutors' feedback: A qualitative study of high and non-high achieving biology undergraduates

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 737-753

  Orsmond, Paul ^a   Merry, Stephen ^a  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

feedback; high; non high achieving students; self assessment; social learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879676669     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2012.697868     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Boud, D. 1995. Enhancing learning through self assessment, London: Kogan Press.
2. Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. 1989. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education; a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18: 529 - 49.
3. Carless, D. 2006. Different perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2): 219 - 233.
4. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. and Lam, J. 2011. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (40): 395 - 407.
5. Cartney, P. 2010. Exploring the use of peer-assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5): 551 - 564.
6. Chanock, K. 2000. Comments on essays: Do students understand with tutors write?. Teaching in Higher Education, 5 (1): 95 - 105.
7. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. 1994. Research methods in education, London: Routledge.
8. Crisp, B. 2007. Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students' subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32: 571 - 581.
9. Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Mawc, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., Orsmond, P., Gomez, S. and Park, J. 2012. The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?. Computers and Education, 58 (1): 386 - 396. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013151100203X (accessed May 16, 2012)
10. Dahlgren, L.O. and Marton, F. 1978. Students' conceptions of subject matter: An aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 3: 25 - 35.
11. Duncan, N. 2007. 'Feedforward': Improving students' use of tutors' comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (3): 271 - 283.
12. Entwistle, N. and Marton, F. 1994. Knowledge objects: Understandings constituted through intensive academic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64: 161 - 178.
13. Fielding, N. 1994. " Qualitative interviewing ". In Researching social life, Edited by: Gilbert, N. 154 - 71. London: Sage.
14. Fyrenius, A., Wirell, S. and Silën, C. 2007. Students approaches to achieving understanding - approaches to learning revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 32: 149 - 165.
15. Glover, C. and Brown, E. 2006. Written feedback to students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective?. Bioscience Education E-Journal, 7: 7 - 3. http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol7/beej-7-3.pdf (accessed August 6, 2010)
16. Handley, K. and Williams, L. 2011. From copying to learning: Using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (1): 95 - 108.
17. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77: 81 - 112.
18. Havnes, A. 2008. Peer-mediated learning beyond the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 53 (2): 193 - 204.
19. Hendry, G.D., Bromberger, N. and Armstrong, S. 2011. Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: The usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (1): 1 - 11.
20. Higgins, R., Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. 2002. The conscientious consumer reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27: 53 - 64.
21. Kirby, N.F. and Downs, C.T. 2007. Self-assessment and the disadvantaged student: Potential for encouraging self-regulated learning?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (4): 475 - 494.
22. Langer, E.J. 1989. Mindfulness, New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
23. Lea, M.R. and Street, B.V. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2): 157 - 172.
24. Liu, N.-F. and Carless, D. 2006. Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (3): 279 - 290.
25. Marton, F. and Booth, S. 1997. Learning and awareness, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. and Beaty, E. 1993. Conception of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19: 277 - 300.
27. Marton, F. and Pang, F.P. 2006. On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (2): 193 - 220.
28. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. 1976. On qualitative differences in learning 1 - outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 4 - 11.
29. McCune, V. and Entwistle, N. 2011. Cultivating the disposition to understand in the 21st century university education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21: 303 - 310.
30. McMahon, T. 2010. Combining peer-assessment with negotiated learning activities on a day-release undergraduate-level certificate course (ECTS level 3). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (2): 223 - 239.
31. Merry, S. and Orsmond, P. 2008. Students' responses to academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education e-Journal, 11: 11 - 3. http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol11/beej-11-3.pdf (accessed April 17, 2012)
32. Mok, M.M.C., Lung, C.L., Cheng, D.P.W., Cheung, H.P. and Ng, M.L. 2006. Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (4): 415 - 33.
33. Nicol, D. 2010. From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5): 501 - 517.
34. Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31: 199 - 218.
35. Olge, D. 1986. K.W.L. A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39: 563 - 70.
36. Orrell, J. 2006. Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (4): 441 - 456.
37. Orsmond, P. 2011. Self- and peer-assessment: Guidance on practice in the biosciences, 2nd ed., Leeds: The Higher Education Academy Centre for Biosciences.
38. Orsmond, P. and Merry, S. 2011. Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors' and students' understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36: 125 - 136.
39. Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and A.A. Callaghan. 2011. Communities of practice and ways to learning: Charting the progress of biology undergraduates. Studies in Higher Education 1-17, iFirst Article.
40. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Sheffield, D. 2006. A quantitative and qualitative study of changes in the use of learning outcomes and distractions by students and tutors during a biology poster assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32: 262 - 287.
41. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Reiling, K. 2005. Biology students' utilisation of tutors' formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (5): 369 - 86.
42. Perkins, D.N. 2008. " Beyond understanding ". In Threshold concepts within the disciplines, Edited by: Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F. and Smith, J. 3 - 20. Rotterdam: Sense.
43. Perkins, D.N. and Tishman, S. 2001. " Dispositional aspects of intelligence ". In Intelligence and personality, Edited by: Collis, J.M. and Messicks, S. 233 - 57. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Poulos, A. and Mahony, M.J. 2008. Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (2): 143 - 154.
45. Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education 1-18, iFirst Article.
46. Pryor, J. and Crossouard, B. 2008. A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34 (1): 1 - 20.
47. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
48. Sadler, D.R. 2010. Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5): 535 - 550.
49. Sambell, K. and C. Montgomery. 2009. Rethinking feedback as a learning space: Students' views of assessment for learning. Paper presented at the European Association for Research into Learning and Instruction, August 25-29, in Amsterdam.
50. Smith, J.A. and Osborn, M. 2003. " Interpretative phenomenological analysis ". In Qualitative psychology, Edited by: Smith, J.A. 51 - 80. London: Sage.
51. Svensson, L. 1977. On qualitative differences in learning III - study skills and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47: 233 - 243.
52. Weaver, M.R. 2006. Do students value feedback? Students' perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (3): 379 - 394.
53. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.