-
1
-
-
77949874569
-
Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing
-
Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2010. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 328–338. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 328-338
-
-
Cho, K.1
MacArthur, C.2
-
2
-
-
33745018833
-
Commenting on Writing
-
Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and D. Charney. 2006. “Commenting on Writing.” Written Communication 23 (3): 260–294. doi:10.1177/0741088306289261.10.1177/0741088306289261
-
(2006)
Written Communication
, vol.23
, Issue.3
, pp. 260-294
-
-
Cho, K.1
Schunn, C.D.2
Charney, D.3
-
3
-
-
40549100333
-
Peer-based Computer Supported Knowledge Refinement
-
Cho, K., T. R. Chung, W. R. King, and C. Schunn. 2008. “Peer-based Computer Supported Knowledge Refinement.” Communications of the ACM 51 (3): 83–88. doi:10.1145/1325555.1325571.10.1145/1325555
-
(2008)
Communications of the ACM
, vol.51
, Issue.3
, pp. 83-88
-
-
Cho, K.1
Chung, T.R.2
King, W.R.3
Schunn, C.4
-
4
-
-
32944458781
-
Peer Assessment: Judging the Quality of Students’ Work by Comments Rather than Marks
-
Davies, P. 2006. “Peer Assessment: Judging the Quality of Students’ Work by Comments Rather than Marks.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (1): 69–82. doi:10.1080/14703290500467566.10.1080/14703290500467566
-
(2006)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
, vol.43
, Issue.1
, pp. 69-82
-
-
Davies, P.1
-
5
-
-
77949875444
-
Improving the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback for Learning
-
Gielen, S., E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven. 2010. “Improving the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback for Learning.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 304-315
-
-
Gielen, S.1
Peeters, E.2
Dochy, F.3
Onghena, P.4
Struyven, K.5
-
6
-
-
70449711521
-
-
Quality of Peer Assessment in CS1
-
Hamer, J., H. C. Purchase, P. Denny, and A. Luxton-Reilly. 2009. “Quality of Peer Assessment in CS1.” In 5th International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER), 27–36.
-
(2009)
International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER)
, pp. 27-36
-
-
Hamer, J.1
Purchase, H.C.2
Denny, P.3
Luxton-Reilly, A.4
-
8
-
-
79955551589
-
From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education
-
Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517.
-
(2010)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, Issue.5
, pp. 501-517
-
-
Nicol, D.1
-
9
-
-
77949873085
-
Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are they Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?
-
Strijbos, J., S. Narciss, and K. Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are they Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 291-303
-
-
Strijbos, J.1
Narciss, S.2
Dünnebier, K.3
-
10
-
-
33845266453
-
A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class
-
Yang, M., R. Badger, and Z. Yu. 2006. “A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (3): 179–200. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
-
(2006)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.15
, Issue.3
, pp. 179-200
-
-
Yang, M.1
Badger, R.2
Yu, Z.3
|