Video feedback in higher education - a contribution to improving the quality of written feedback

Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy

Volumn 2012, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 97-113

  Mathisen, Petter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Feedback; Higher education; Screen capture; Video feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865085176     PISSN: 08096724     EISSN: 1891943X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andersen, S. S. (1997). Case-studier og generalisering: forskningsstrategi og design. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
2. Attwell, G., Pachler, N. & Pimmer, C. (2010). Towards Work-Based Mobile Learning: What We Can Learn from the Fields of Work-Based Learning and Mobile Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(4), 1-18.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1998). Spørsmålet om talegenrane. Bergen: Ariadne Forlag.
4. Barholomae, D. (1980) The study of error. College Composition and Communication, 31, 253-369.
5. Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
6. Brick, B. & Holmes, J. (2008). Using screen capture software for student feedback: towards a methodology. IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, (CELDA).
7. Caracelli, V. J. & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation design. I: J. C. Greene and V. J. Caracelli (eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Clark, R. & Mayer, R. (2003). e-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
9. Cohen, A. D. & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In: Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Crawford, J. (1992). Student Response to Feedback Strategies in an English for Academic Purposes Program. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 45-62.
11. Debuse, J., Lawley, M. & Shibl, R. (2007). The implementation of an automated assessment feedback and quality assurance system for ICT courses. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(4), 491-502.
12. Dysthe, O. & Engelsen, K. S. (2007). Variations in higher education portfolio assessment. A nationwide survey in Norway across institutions and disciplines. Paper presented at the Norgesuniversitetets konferanse om e-portfolio, 20 September 2007. Gardermoen Norway.
13. Einstabland, Å. L. & Letnes, O. (2010). Om bruk av JING som verktøy for tilbakemelding på skriftlige innleveringer. (Utviklingsprosjekt, Pedagogisk Utviklingssenter) Kristiansand: Universitetet i Agder.
14. Flyvbjerg, B. (1991). Rationalitet og magt. Bind 1. Det konkretes videnkap. Odense: Akademisk Forlag.
15. Franke, R.H. & Kaul, J. D. (1978). The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 623-643.
16. Fregeau, L. A. (1999). Preparing ESL students for college writing: Two case studies. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(10). Available at http://iteslj.org/Articles/Fregeau-CollegeWriting.html (accessed 30 November 2011)
17. Gardner, S. (2004). Knock-on effects of mode change on academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic, 3(1), 23-38.
18. Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students' learning? Centre for Higher Education Practice, London: Open University Press.
19. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
20. Glower, C. & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education e-Journal, 7. Available at http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol7/beej-7-3.pdf (accessed 30 November 2011)
21. Goldstein, L. & Kohls, R. (2002). Writing, commenting and revising: The relationship between teacher feedback and student revision online. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, 6-9 April 2002, Salt Lake City, Utah.
22. Hattie, J. (2009). The black box of tertiary assessment: an impending revolution. I: Meyer, L. H. et al. (eds.), Tertiary Assessment & Higher Education Student Outcomes: Policy, Practice & Research. Retrieved from: Wellington: New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa, 259-275. Available at http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/ako-aotearoa/ako-aotearoa/resources/pages/black-box-tertiary-assessment-impending-revolution (accessed 30 November 2011)
23. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
24. Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In Catherine Cassell & Gillian Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.
25. Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer. Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64.
26. Holmes, K. & Papageorgiou, G. (2009). Good, bad and insufficient: Students' expectations, perceptions and uses of feedback. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 8(1), 85-96.
27. Hyland, D. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback, System 31 (2), 217-230.
28. Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In: Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. Feedback in Second Language Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
29. Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
30. Lankshear, C & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies: - Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1) 12-24.
31. Lumadue, R. & Fish, W. (2010). A Technologically Based Approach to Providing Quality Feedback to Students: A Paradigm Shift for the 21st Century, Academic Leadership, the online journal. 8(1). Available at http://www.academicleadership.org/article/A_Technologically_Based_Approach_to_Providing_Quality_Feedback_to_Students_A_Paradigm_Shift_for_the_21st_Century (accessed 30 November 2011)
32. Mathisen, P. & Wergeland, B. (2009). Web-basert bilde-lyd mentoring - Pedagogiske muligheter og utfordringer. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4(3-4), 173-188.
33. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. McLaughlin, P., Kerr, W. & Howie, K. (2007). Fuller, richer feedback, more easily delivered, using tablet PCs. Proceedings for the 11th International Conference on Computer Aided Assessment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, 327-340.
35. Neutzsky-Wulff, A. C. (2009). Nærhed i fjernundervisning - om brugen af audio & video i sprogundervisning. Tidsskriftet Læring & Medier 2(2) Available at http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/lom/article/view/3915/3423 (accessed 30 November 2011)
36. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Pepper, M. B. & Pathak, S. (2008). Classroom contribution: What do students perceive as fair assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 360-367.
38. Poulos, A. & Mahoney, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
39. Raaheim, A. (2011). Læring og undervisning. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
40. Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
41. Skjervheim, H. (1996). Deltakar og tilskodar og andre essays. Oslo: Aschehoug.
42. Stannard, R. (2007a). Goodbye to lecture notes. The Guardian, Tuesday 18 September 2007. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/sep/18/link.link24 (accessed 30 November 2011).
43. Stannard, R. (2007b) Using screen capture software in student feedback. HEA English Subject Centre Commissioned Case Studies. Available at http://www.english.heacademy.ac.uk/explore/publications/casestudies/technology/camtasia.php (accessed 30 November 2011).
44. Stannard, R. (2008a). A new direction in feedback. Humanizing Language Teaching, 10(6). Available at http://www.hltmag.co.uk/dec08/mart04.htm#C1 (accessed 30 November 2011).
45. Stannard, R. (2008b). Using Innovative Technology to Improve the Feedback Experience for Students. JISC, RSC - Regional Support Center. Retrieved from: http://www.rsc-london.ac.uk/fileadmin/docs/case_studies/Innovation_and_Student_Feedback.pdf (accessed 30 November 2011).
46. Summerville, J. & Johnson, C. S. (2006). Rural creativity: A study of district mandated online professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 347-361.
47. Sugita, Y. (2006). The impact of teachers' comment types on students' revision. ELT Journal, Oxford Journal, 60/1, 34-41. Available at http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/1/34.full (accessed 30 November 2011).
48. Varis, T. (2008). European and global approaches to digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 3(1), 53-60.
49. Ware, P. D. & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In: Hyland, K. and F. Hyland. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
50. Wilhelmsen, J., Ørnes, H., Kristiansen, T. & Breivik, J. (2009). Digitale utfordringer i høyere utdanning. Norgesuniversitetets IKT-monitor. 1/2009. Available at http://norgesuniversitetet.no/files/NUV-rapp_1_09_Digitale_utfordringer.pdf (accessed 30 November 2011).
51. Wolsey, T. D. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on ELearning, 7(2), 311-329.
52. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
53. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-101.