The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education

Computers and Education

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1804-1817

  van der Pol, J ^a   van den Berg, B A M ^a   Admiraal, W F ^b   Simons, P R J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Computer mediated communication; Evaluation of CAL systems; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

ANNOTATION SYSTEMS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; DISCUSSION FORUMS; EVALUATION OF CAL SYSTEMS; HIGHER EDUCATION; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 49449087915     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bhalero A., and Ward A. Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: A case study. ALT-J 9 1 (2001) 26-37
2. Billet S. Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work. Studies in the Education of Adults 34 1 (2002) 56-68
3. Chaudron, C. (1983). Evaluating writing: Effects of feedback on revision. In Paper presented at the 17th annual teachers of English to speakers of other languages TESOL convention.
4. Dochy F., Segers M., and Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education 24 (1999) 331-350
5. Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 26 2 (2004) 247-273
6. Falchikov N. Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative self and peer group assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11 2 (1986) 146-166
7. Falchikov N., and Boud D. Students self-assessment in Higher Education: A meta analysis. Review of Education Research 59 4 (1989) 395-430
8. Falchikov N., and Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research 70 3 (2000) 287-322
9. Fiehn T., Lauer T., Lienhard J., Ottmann T., Trahasch S., and Zupancic B. From lecture recording towards personalized collaborative learning. In: Wasson B., Ludigsen S., and Hoppe U. (Eds). Designing for change in networked learning environment. Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London 471-475
10. Flower L., Hayes J.R., Carey L., Schriver K., and Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 37 (1986) 16-55
11. Gehringer E. Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. In: Walker H. (Ed). Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) technical symposium on computer science education (2001), ACM Press, New York 139-143
12. Gibbs G., and Simpson C. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1 (2004) 3-31
13. Hattie J., and Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 1 (2007) 81-112
14. Hewitt B.L. Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition 17 3 (2000) 265-288
15. Jacobs, G., & Zhang, S. (1989). Peer feedback in second language writing instruction: Boon or bane? In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association.
16. McCormack C., and Jones D. Building a web-based education system (1998), Wiley, New York
17. Nicol D.J., and Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2006) 199-218
18. Orsmond P., Merry S., and Reiling K. The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (1996) 239-249
19. Prins, F., Sluijsmans, D., & Kirschner, P. (2006). Peer feedback exercises for general practitioners: Improving skills for professional development. In Paper presented at the conference of the American educational research association.
20. Riffe D., Lacy S., and Fico F. Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
21. Saunders W. Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research 13 (1989) 101-112
22. Shekary M., and Tahririan M.H. Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal 90 4 (2006) 557-573
23. Shiffman S.M., and Stone A.A. Ecological momentary assessment: A new tool for behavioural medicine research. In: David E., Krantz S., and Baum E.A. (Eds). Technology and methods in behavioural medicine (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 17-131
24. Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2004). Using web-based peer assessment in fostering deep learning in computer programming. In Paper presented at the international conference on education and information systems: Technologies and applications.
25. e herziene druk) (1992), Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen
26. Tannacito T., and Tuzi F. A comparison of e-response: Two experiences; one conclusion. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 7 3 (2002) 1-21
27. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68 3 (1998) 249-276
28. Topping K.J. Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In: Segers M.S.R., Dochy F.J.R.C., and Cascallar E.C. (Eds). Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands 55-87
29. Topping K. Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology 25 6 (2005) 631-645
30. Topping K., Smith E., Swanson I., and Elliot A. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 2 (2000) 149-169
31. Trahasch S. Towards a flexible peer assessment system. In: Akpinar Y. (Ed). Proceedings of 5th international conference on information technology based higher education and training (2004), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Istanbul 16-20
32. Tuzi F. The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition 21 2 (2004) 217-235
33. Van den Berg B.A.M., Admiraal W.F., and Pilot A. Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 31 3 (2006) 341-356
34. Van den Berg B.A.M., Admiraal W.F., and Pilot A. Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 11 (2006) 135-147
35. Van der Pol J., Admiraal W.F., and Simons P.R.J. The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 1 3 (2006) 339-357
36. Van Weert T.J., and Pilot A. Task-based team learning with ICT: Design and development of new learning. Education and Information Technologies 8 2 (2003) 195-214
37. Webb N.M., and Mastergeorge A.M. Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research 39 (2003) 73-97