Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education

Computers and Education

Volumn 65, Issue , 2013, Pages 64-76

  Han, Jae Hoon ^a   Finkelstein, Adam ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Improving classroom teaching; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues; Post secondary education; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; ROOM AND PILLAR MINING; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84874864218     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. S. d'Apollonia, and P.C. Abrami Navigating student ratings of instruction American Psychologist 52 11 1997 1198 1208 10.1037/0003-066x.52.11.1198 (Pubitemid 127680850)
2. I. Beatty, and W. Gerace Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology Journal of Science Education and Technology 18 2 2009 146 162 10.1007/s10956-008-9140-4
3. J.B. Biggs Teaching for quality learning at university 2nd ed. 2003 Open University Press Glasgow, UK
4. E. Blood, and R. Neel Using student response systems in lecture-based instruction: does it change student engagement and learning? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 16 3 2008 375 383
5. E.D. Bojinova, and J.N. Oigara Teaching and learning with clickers: are clickers good for students? Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 7 2011 169 184
6. J.T. Boyle, and D.J. Nicol Using classroom communication systems to support Interaction and discussion in large class settings Association of Learning Technology Journal 11 3 2003 43 57
7. C.A. Brewer Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology courses BioScience 54 11 2004 1034 1039 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1034:NRAOSL]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 39471333)
8. D. Bruff Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments 2009 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
9. D.M. Bunce, J.R. VandenPlas, and K.L. Havanki Comparing the effectiveness on student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes Journal of Chemical Education 83 3 2006 488 493 10.1021/ed083p488 (Pubitemid 43329121)
10. J. Campbell, and R.E. Mayer Questioning as an instructional method: does it affect learning from lectures? Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 6 2009 747 759 10.1002/acp.1513
11. W. Cardoso Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: the students' perspective Computer Assisted Language Learning 24 5 2011 393 417 10.1080/09588221.2011.567354
12. C.R. Carpenter The classroom communicator (rapid mass learning) Technical report 1950 (P. W. Office of Naval Research, NY. Special Devices Center., Trans.): Pennsylvania State University, University Park. College of Education
13. C.R. Carpenter The film analyzer (rapid mass learning) Technical report 1950 (P. W. Office of Naval Research, NY. Special Devices Center., Trans.): Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park. College of Education
14. R.B. Cattell The scree test for the number of factors Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 2 1966 245 276 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102-10
15. R.E. Clark Reconsidering research on learning from media Review of Educational Research 53 4 1983 445 459 10.3102/00346543053004445
16. J. Cohen Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
17. E. Corcos, and V. Monty Interactivity in library presentations using a personal response system EDUCAUSE Quarterly 31 2 2008 53 60
18. K. Crossgrove, and K.L. Curran Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material CBE-Life Sciences Education 7 1 2008 146 154 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0060 (Pubitemid 351872994)
19. C.H. Crouch, and E. Mazur Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results American Journal of Physics 69 9 2001 970 977 10.1119/1.1374249 (Pubitemid 33325047)
20. D'Arcy, Eastburn, and Mullally Effective use of a personal response system in a general education plant pathology class The Plant Health Instructor 2007 10.1094/PHI-T-2007-0315-07
21. G.A. DeBourgh Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills Nurse Education in Practice 8 2 2008 76 87 10.1016/j.nepr.2007.02.002
22. R.F. DeVellis Scale development: Theory and applications 3rd ed. 2012 SAGE Thousand Oaks, CA
23. S.W. Draper, and M.I. Brown Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 2 2004 81 94 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x (Pubitemid 38883623)
24. N. Entwistle Taking stock: an overview of key research findings J.C. Hughes, J. Mighty, Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education 2010 McGill-Queen's University Press Montreal, QC, Canada 15 57
25. A.P. Fagen, C.H. Crouch, and E. Mazur Peer instruction: results from a range of classrooms The Physics Teacher 40 4 2002 206 209 10.1119/1.1474140
26. J.L. Fava, and W.F. Velicer An empirical comparison of factor, image, component, and scale scores Multivariate Behavioral Research 27 3 1992 301 322
27. C. Fies, and J. Marshall Classroom response systems: a review of the literature Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 1 2006 101 109 10.1007/s10956-006-0360-1 (Pubitemid 44757013)
28. J.L. Fitch Student feedback in the college classroom: a technology solution Educational Technology Research and Development 52 1 2004 71 77 10.1007/BF02504773
29. J.A. Fredricks, P.C. Blumenfeld, and A.H. Paris School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence Review of Educational Research 74 1 2004 59 109 10.3102/00346543074001059 (Pubitemid 38651980)
30. S.A. Gauci, A.M. Dantas, D.A. Williams, and R.E. Kemm Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system Advances in Physiology Education 33 2009 60 71 10.1152/advan.00109.2007
31. D. George, and P. Mallery IBM SPSS statistics 19 step by step: A simple guide and reference 12th ed. 2012 Pearson Boston, MA
32. C.R. Graham, T.R. Tripp, L. Seawright, and G. Joeckel Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems Active Learning in Higher Education 8 3 2007 233 258 10.1177/1469787407081885
33. L. Greer, and P.J. Heaney Real-time analysis of student comprehension: an assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory earth science course Journal of Geoscience Education 52 4 2004 345 351
34. A. Hoekstra Vibrant student voices: exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses Learning, Media and Technology 33 4 2008 329 341 10.1080/17439880802497081
35. J. Horn A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis Psychometrika 30 2 1965 179 185 10.1007/bf02289447
36. M.C. James The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in peer instruction American Journal of Physics 74 8 2006 689 691 10.1119/1.2198887 (Pubitemid 44197334)
37. M.C. James, F. Barbieri, and P. Garcia What are they talking about? Lessons learned from a study of peer instruction Astronomy Education Review 7 1 2008 37 43 10.3847/AER2008004
38. T. Johnson, and A. Meckelborg Student response systems: A cure for lecturalgia? 2008 Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008, Vienna, Austria
39. H.F. Kaiser, and J. Rice Little jiffy, mark Iv Educational and Psychological Measurement 34 1 1974 111 117 10.1177/001316447403400115
40. R.H. Kay, and A. LeSage Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature Computers & Education 53 3 2009 819 827 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001
41. S.O. King, and C.L. Robinson 'Pretty Lights' and maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems Computers & Education 53 1 2009 189 199 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01. 012
42. P. Knight, and M. Yorke Assessment learning and employability 2003 McGraw-Hill Education Maidenhead, UK
43. N. Lasry, E. Mazur, and J. Watkins Peer instruction: from Harvard to the two-year college American Journal of Physics 76 11 2008 1066 1069 10.1119/1.2978182
44. R. Latessa, and D. Mouw Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning Family Medicine 37 1 2005 12 14 (Pubitemid 40094084)
45. E. MacGeorge, S. Homan, J. Dunning, D. Elmore, G. Bodie, and E. Evans Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes Educational Technology Research and Development 56 2 2008 125 145 10.1007/s11423-007-9053-6
46. W.J. McKeachie Research on college teaching: the historical background Journal of Educational Psychology 82 2 1990 189 200 10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.189
47. R.E. Mayer, A. Stull, K. DeLeeuw, K. Almeroth, B. Bimber, and D. Chun Clickers in college classrooms: fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 1 2009 51 57 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002
48. E. Mazur Peer instruction: A user's manual 1997 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
49. R.G. Miller, B.H. Ashar, and K.J. Getz Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 23 2 2003 109 115 10.1002/chp.1340230208
50. S. Mollborn, and A. Hoekstra "A Meeting of Minds": using clickers for critical thinking and discussion in large sociology classes Teaching Sociology 38 1 2010 18 27 10.1177/0092055x09353890
51. C. Moredich, and E. Moore Engaging students through the use of classroom response systems Nurse Educator 32 3 2007 113 116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. NNE.0000270225.76661.74
52. B. Morling, M. McAuliffe, L. Cohen, and T.M. DiLorenzo Efficacy of personal response systems ("Clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes Teaching of Psychology 35 1 2008 45 50 10.1080/ 00986280701818516
53. S.A. Mulaik The foundations of factor analysis 2nd ed. 2010 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
54. D.J. Nicol, and J.T. Boyle Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom Studies in Higher Education 28 4 2003 457 473 10.1080/0307507032000122297 (Pubitemid 37291695)
55. E.G. Offerdahl, and D. Tomanek Changes in instructors' assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 7 2011 781 795 10.1080/02602938.2010.488794
56. B. Oliver, B. Tucker, R. Gupta, and S. Yeo eVALUate: an evaluation instrument for measuring students' perceptions of their engagement and learning outcomes Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 6 2008 619 630 10.1080/02602930701773034
57. W. Penuel, C. Boscardin, K. Masyn, and V. Crawford Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: a survey study Educational Technology Research and Development 55 4 2007 315 346 10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4
58. C.R. Poirier, and R.S. Feldman Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes Teaching of Psychology 34 3 2007 194 196 10.1080/00986280701498665
59. A. Pradhan, D. Sparano, and C.V. Ananth The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193 2005 1827 1830 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.075 (Pubitemid 41540499)
60. N.W. Reay, P. Li, and L. Bao Testing a new voting machine question methodology American Journal of Physics 76 2 2008 171 178 10.1119/1.2820392
61. J. Reeve, H. Jang, D. Carrell, S. Jeon, and J. Barch Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support Motivation and Emotion 28 2 2004 147 169 10.1023/B: MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f (Pubitemid 38919295)
62. R.E. Rice, and U. Bunz Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: the role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competency, and usage Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education 6 3 2006 1 23 10.3138/sim.6.3.002
63. R.J. Roselli, and S.P. Brophy Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms Journal of Engineering Education 95 2006 311 324
64. A. Saroyan, and C. Amundsen Rethinking teaching in higher education 2004 Stylus Sterling, VA
65. D.M. Shaffer, and M.J. Collura Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom Teaching of Psychology 36 4 2009 273 277 10.1080/00986280903175749
66. K. Siau, H. Sheng, and F.F. Nah Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity IEEE Transactions on Education 49 3 2006 398 403 10.1109/TE.2006.879802 (Pubitemid 44263771)
67. V. Simpson, and M. Oliver Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: a comparison of research and practice Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23 2 2007 187 208
68. P.S. Stein, S.D. Challman, and J.K. Brueckner Using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course Journal of Nursing Education 45 11 2006 469 473 (Pubitemid 44785499)
69. J. Steinberg More professors give out hand-held devices to monitor students and engage them 2010, November 16 The New York Times
70. A. Stes, M. Min-Leliveld, D. Gijbels, and P. Van Petegem The impact of instructional development in higher education: the state-of-the-art of the research Educational Research Review 5 1 2010 25 49 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.07.001
71. J.P. Stevens Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 4th ed. 2002 Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
72. F. Stevenson Clickers: the use of audience response questions to enliven lectures and stimulate teamwork Journal of International Association of Medical Science Educators 17 2 2007 106 111
73. J.R. Stowell, and J.M. Nelson Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion Teaching of Psychology 34 4 2007 253 258 10.1080/00986280701700391
74. B.G. Tabachnick, and L.S. Fidell Using multivariate statistics 6th ed. 2012 Pearson Education Upper Saddle River, NJ
75. K. Trigwell Teaching and learning: a relational view J.C. Hughes, J. Mighty, Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education 2010 McGill-Queen's University Press Montreal, QC, Canada 115 128
76. L.A. Van Dijk, G.C. Van Den Berg, and H. Van Keulen Interactive lectures in engineering education European Journal of Engineering Education 26 1 2001 15 28 10.1080/03043790123124 (Pubitemid 33232281)
77. W.F. Velicer, and D.N. Jackson Component analysis versus common factor analysis: some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure Multivariate Behavioral Research 25 1 1990 1 28
78. M. Weimer, and L.F. Lenze Instructional interventions: a review of the literature and interventions J.C. Smart, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research Vol. VII 1991 Agathon Press New York, NY 294 333
79. C. Weston, and P.A. Cranton Selecting instructional strategies The Journal of Higher Education 57 3 1986 259 288
80. C. Weston, C. Le Maistre, L. McAlpine, and T. Bordonaro The influence of participants in formative evaluation on the improvement of learning from written instructional materials Instructional Science 25 5 1997 369 386 10.1023/a:1003073923764 (Pubitemid 127123142)
81. C. Wieman Why not try a scientific approaches to science education? J.C. Hughes, J. Mighty, Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education 2010 McGill-Queen's University Press Montreal, QC, Canada 175 190
82. B. Williams, and M. Boyle The use of interactive wireless keypads for interprofessional learning experiences by undergraduate emergency health students International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT 4 1 2008 Available at: http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=405
83. R.K. Yin Case study research: Design and methods 4th ed. 2009 SAGE Thousand Oaks, CA