What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 1302-1314

  RachelleEsterhazy, ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

discipline; Feedback; qualitative research; relations; social practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85054377072     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463353     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ajjawi, R., and D., Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An Interactional Analysis Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 252–265.10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
2. Ajjawi, R., E., Molloy, M., Bearman, and C. E., Rees. 2017. “Contextual Influences on Feedback Practices: An Ecological Perspective.” In Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, edited by D., Carless, S., Bridges, C. K. Y., Chan and R., Glofcheski, 129–143. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1
3. Anderson, C., 2014. “Only Connect? Communicating Meaning through Feedback.” In Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback, edited by C., Kreber, C., Anderson, N., Entwistle and J., McArthur, 131–151. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694549.001.0001
4. Anderson, C., and D., Hounsell. 2007. “Knowledge Practices: ‘Doing the Subject’ in Undergraduate Courses.” Curriculum Journal 18 (4): 463–478.10.1080/09585170701687910
5. Boud, D., and E., Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712.10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
6. Eisenhart, M., 2009. “Generalization from Qualitative Inquiry.” In Generalizing from Educational Research: Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Polarization, edited by K., Ercikan and W. M., Roth, 51–66. New York: Routledge
7. Eriksson, A. M., and Å., Mäkitalo. 2015. “Supervision at the Outline Stage: Introducing and Encountering Issues of Sustainable Development through Academic Writing Assignments.” Text & Talk 35 (2): 123–153
8. Esterhazy, R., and C., Damşa. 2017. “Unpacking the Feedback Process: An Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Interactional Meaning-Making of Feedback Comments.” Studies in Higher Education 1–15.10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249
9. Evans, C., 2013. “Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research 83 (1): 70–120.10.3102/0034654312474350
10. Jansson, G., 2006. “Recontextualisation Processes as Sense‐Making Practice in Student‐Writers’ Collaborative Dialogue.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (6): 667–688.10.1080/03075070601004275
11. Price, M., K., Handley, B., O’Donovan, C., Rust, and J., Millar. 2013. “Assessment Feedback: An Agenda for Change.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students, edited by M., Price, S., Merry and D., Carless, 41–53. London: Routledge
12. Säljö, R., 2005. Lärande Och Kulturella Redskap: Om Lärprocesser Och Det Kollektiva Minnet. [Learners and Cultural Tools: On Learning Processes and the Collective Mind]. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag
13. Säljö, R., 2010. “Learning in a Sociocultural Perspective.” In International Encyclopedia of Education. 3rd ed, edited by P., Peterson, E., Baker and B., McGaw, 498–502. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00471-1
14. Shute, V. J., 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
15. Wertsch, J. V., 1998. Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press
16. Winstone, N. E., R. A., Nash, M., Parker, and J., Rowntree. 2016. “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37