Educator's perceptions of automated feedback systems

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 374-386

  Debuse, Justin C W ^a   Lawley, Meredith ^a   Shibl, Rania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54849425803     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1198     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blayney, P. & Freeman, M. (2004). Automated formative feedback and summative assessment using individualised spreadsheet assignments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 203-231. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/blayney.html
2. Bongalos, Y., Bulaon, D., Celedonio, L., Guzman, A. d. & Ogarte, C. (2006). University teachers' experiences in courseware development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 695.
3. Bower, M. (2005). Online assessment feedback: Competitive, individualistic, or... preferred form! Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(2), 121-147.
4. Cargill, M. (2001). Enhancing essay feed-back using 'MindTrail' software: Exactly what makes the difference in student development? Proceedings of the Changing Identities: Language and academic skills conference, the University of Wollongong, Australia. http://learning.uow.edu.au/LAS2001/unrefereed/cargill.pdf
5. Debuse, J., Lawley, M. & Shibl, R. (2007). The implementation of an automated assessment feedback and quality assurance system for ICT courses. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(4), 491-502.
6. Denton, P. (2001). MS Office software for returning feedback to students via email. [viewed 30 May 2005] http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ embedded_object.asp?id=21653&filename=Denton
7. Dunn, L., Parry, S. & Morgan, C. (2002). Seeking quality in criterion referenced assessment. Learning Communities and Assessment Cultures Conference. University of Northumbria.
8. Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53.
9. Holmes, L. E. & Smith, L. J. (2003). Student evaluations of faculty grading methods. Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 318.
10. James, R., McInnis, C. & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities: Ideas strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
11. McCormack, C. & Taylor, M. J. (2006). Electronic delivery of oral feedback on graphic design projects. Proceedings ASCILITE Sydney 2006. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/ pdf¶pers/p72.pdf
12. Meister, D. B. & Compeau, D. R. (2002). Infusion of innovation adoption: An individual perspective. Proceedings of the ASAC, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
13. Parikh, A., McReelis, K. & Hodges, B. (2001). Student feedback in problem based learning: A survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical schools. Medical Education, 35(7), 632-636.
14. Re:Mark (2006). Re:Mark online grading and markup solution for Blackboard. [viewed 22 May 2006] http://www.mydropbox.com/info/ ReMark_for_Blackboard.pdf
15. Selwood, I. (2004). Information technology in educational administration management and in schools in England and Wales: Scope, progress and limits. Unpublished PhD, University of Birmingham.
16. Selwood, I. & Pilkington, R. (2005). Teacher workload: using ICT to release time to teach. Educational Review, 57(2), 163-174.
17. Stevens, K. & Jamieson, R. (2002). The introduction and assessment of three teaching tools (WebCT, MindTrail, EVE) into a post graduate course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(4), 233-252.
18. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 45(2), 186-204.
19. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
20. Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.
21. Wiggins, G. (1997). Feedback: How learning occurs. In Assessing impact evidence and action (pp. 31-39): American Association of Higher Education.
22. Williams, R., & Dreher, H. (2004). Automatically grading essays with MarkIT. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 693-700.