Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 420-432

  Lin, Sunny S J ^a   Liu, E Z F ^b   Yuan, S M ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Aptitude; Computer science; Discourse analysis; Feedback; Peer assessment; Undergraduate; World wide web

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035540944     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulick, C.L.C., Kulick, J.A. & Morgan, M.T. (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
2. Barrett, E. & Lally, V. (1999) Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 1, 48-60.
3. Carson, J.G. & Nelson, G.L. (1996) Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response and group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
4. Chi, M.T.H. (1996) Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S33-S49.
5. Crooks, T.J. (1988) The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 45-56.
6. Davis, R. & Berrow, T. (1998) An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills. Computers and Education, 30, 1/2, 111-115.
7. Downing, T. & Brown, I. (1997) Learning by cooperative publishing on the World Wide Web. Active Learning, 7, 14-16.
8. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1999) The Complete Guide to the Learning Styles Inservice System. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
9. Dunn, R., Dunn, K. & Perrin, J. (1994). Teaching Young Children Through Their Individual Learning Styles. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
10. Dunn, R., Griggs, S.A., Olson, J., Gorman, B. & Beasley, M. (1995) A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning style preferences. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 6, 353-361.
11. Fabos, B. & Young, M.D. (1999) Telecommunication in the classroom: Rhetoric versus reality. Review of Educational Research, 69, 3, 217-259.
12. Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International., 32, 175-187.
13. Freeman, M. (1995) Peer assessment by groups of group work. 'Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 20, 289-300.
14. Hara, N., Bonk, C.J. & Angeli, C. (2000) Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
15. Henri, F. (1992) Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: the Najaden Papers, (ed. A.R. Kaye) pp. 115-136. Springer, New York.
16. Kulik, J.A. & Kulik, C.L.C. (1988) Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
17. Kwok, R.C.W. & Ma, J. (1999) Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers and Education, 32, 2, 109-125.
18. Lin, S.S.J. & Chao, I.-C. (1999) The Manual for use with Thinking Style Inventory-Taiwan version. Unpublished manual. Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
19. Lin, S.S.J., Liu, E.Z., Chiu, C.H. & Yuan, S.M. (2001a) Web-Based Peer Assessment: attitude and Achievement. IEEE Transaction on Education, 4, 2, 211.
20. Lin, S.S.J., Liu, E.Z. & Yuan, S.M. (2001b) Web peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, 3, 246-251.
21. Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C.H., & Yuan, S.-M. (1999) Student participation in computer sciences courses via the Network Peer Assessment System. Advanced Research in Computers and Communications in Education, 2, 744-747.
22. Mason, R. & Bacsich, P. (1998) Embedding computer conferencing into University teaching. Computers and Education, 30, 3/4, 249-258.
23. McDowell, L. (1995) The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 302-313.
24. Owston, R.D. (1997) The World Wide Web: a technology to enhance teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 26, 2, 27-33.
25. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W.J. (1991) A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for learning Questionnaire. Technical Report # 91-B-004. School of Education, University of Michigan.
26. Rada, R. (1998) Efficiency and effectiveness in computer-supported peer-peer learning. Computers and Education, 30, 3/4, 137-146.
27. Roth, W.M. (1997) From everyday science to science education: how science and technology studies inspired curriculum design and classroom research. Science and Education, 6, 373-396.
28. Rogoff, B. (1991) Social interaction as apprenticeship in thinking: guidance and participation in spatial planning. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, (eds. L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasley) pp. 349-383. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
29. Steeples, C. & Mayers, T. (1998) A special section on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 30, 3/4, 219-221.
30. Sternberg, R.J. (1994) Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In Personality and Intelligence (eds. R.J. Sterberg & P. Ruzgis) pp. 169-187. Cambridge University Press, New York.
31. Sternberg, R.J. (1998) Thinking Styles. Cambridge University Press, New York.
32. Strachan, I.B. & Wilcox, S. (1996) Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrollment in a third year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education., 20, 3, 343-353.
33. Topping, K. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
34. Van Lehn, K.A., Chi, M.T.H., Baggett, W. & Murray, R.C. (1995) Progress report: Towards a theory of learning during tutoring. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
35. Wang, S.-L. & Lin, S.S.J. (2000) Cross culture validation of Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
36. Yagelski, R.P. & Powley, S. (1996) Virtual connections and real boundaries: Teaching writing and preparing writing teachers on the Internet. Computers and Composition, 13, 25-36.
37. Zhao, Y. (1998) The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4, 4, 311-345.