Hearing you loud and clear: student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 554-566

  Gould, Jill ^a   Day, Pat ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

audio feedback; community specialist education; independent learning; post registration community nursing students

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878664308     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2012.660131     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brown G. 2001. Assessment: A guide for lecturers. LTSIN Generic Assessment Series No. 3.
2. Carey, L. and Whittaker, K. 2002. Experiences of problem-based learning: Issues for community specialist practitioner students. Nurse Education Today, 22: 661 - 668.
3. Charmaz, K. 2011. " Grounded theory methods in social justice research ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. 359 - 380. London: Sage.
4. Chiang, I.A. Which audio feedback is best? Optimising audio feedback to maximize student and staff experience. Paper presented at the the 1st Annual Meeting of A Word in Your Ear. Sheffield, England.
5. Chiang, I.A. Evaluation of three audio feedback methods. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Sheffield, England. pp. 2654 - 2658. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
6. Emery, R., and A. Atkinson. 2009. Group assessment feedback: 'The good, the bad and the ugly'. Paper presented at the 1st Annual Meeting of A Word in Your Ear, Sheffield, UK.
7. Field, R. and Kift, S. 2010. Addressing the high levels of psychological distress in law students through intentional assessment and feedback design in the first year law curriculum. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1 (1): 65 - 76.
8. Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. " Case study ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. 301 - 316. London: Sage.
9. Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. 2004. Conditions under which assessment supports learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1: 3 - 31.
10. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
11. Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2007. National Student Survey. www.hfce.ac.uk/learning/nss.
12. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P. and Wells, J. 2007. Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11 (2): 3 - 25.
13. Kift, S., and K. Moody. 2009. Harnessing assessment and feedback in the first year to support learning success, engagement and retention. ATN Assessment Conference, RMIT University.
14. King, D., McGugan, S. and Bunyan, N. 2008. Does it make a difference? Replacing text with audio feedback. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 3 (2): 145 - 163.
15. Lunt, Tom, and John Curran.2009. 'Are you listening please?' The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, First published on: 01 September 2009.
16. Martin, C. 2007. About the reading project (online). http://reading.cornell.edu/project.htm (accessed October 21, 2011).
17. Merry, S. and Orsmond, P. 2008. Students' attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Journal, 11: 11 - 13.
18. Middleton A., A. Nortcliffe, and R. Owens. 2009. iGather: Learners as responsible audio collectors of tutor, peer and self reflection. http://research.shu.ac.uk/lti/awordinyourear2009/docs (accessed February 1, 2011).
19. Miles, M and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. National Union Students (NUS). 2010. Charter on feedback and assessment. www.nusconnect.org.uk/ (accessed October 10, 2011).
21. Nicol, D. 2009. Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (3): 335 - 352.
22. Nicol, D. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2): 199 - 218.
23. Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Pintrich, P. and Zusho, A. 2002. " Student motivation and self regulated learning in the college classroom ". In Higher education: Handbook of theory, research, Edited by: Smart, J. and Tierney, W. New York, NY: Agathon Press.
25. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J. and O'Donovan, B. 2010. Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (3): 277 - 289.
26. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. 2006. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education: Section 6: Assessment of students. Gloucester, UK: QAA. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Code-of-practice-Section-6.aspx.
27. Rust C. 2001. A briefing on the assessment of large groups. www.heacademy.ac.uk/resouces/detail/ourwork/tla/assessment_series.
28. Sadler, D. 2010. Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5): 535 - 550.
29. Sandelowski, M. 1995. Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing and Health, 18: 371 - 375.
30. Straus, A. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Whittemore, R. and Knafl, K. 2005. The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52 (5): 546 - 553.