A role for technology in enhancing students' engagement with feedback

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 963-973

  Parkin, Helen J ^a   Hepplestone, Stuart ^a   Holden, Graham ^a   Irwin, Brian ^a   Thorpe, Louise ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

engagement; feedback; innovation; reflection; technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869384322     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.592934     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7-74.
2. Bloxham, S. and Boyd, P. 2007. Developing effective assessment in higher education, Berkshire: Open University Press.
3. Bridge, P. and Appleyard, R. 2005. System failure: A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission, marking, and feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4): 669-71.
4. Carless, D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 21(2): 219-33.
5. Creanor, L., Trinder, K., Gowan, D. and Howells., C. 2006. "Who's learning and how? Researching the learner experience". In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who's learning? Whose technology?, Edited by: Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P. and Reimann, P. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
6. Denton, P. 2001a. Generating and e-mailing feedback to students using MS Office. In Proceedings of the 5th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. http://www.caaconference.co.uk/pastConferences/2001/proceedings/j3.pdf (accessed October 14, 2010).
7. Denton, P. 2001b. Generating coursework feedback for large groups of students using MS Excel and MS Word. University Chemistry Education 5(1): 1-8. http://www.rsc.org/pdf/uchemed/papers/2001/p1_denton.pdf (accessed October 14, 2010).
8. Denton, P. 2003. Returning feedback to students via email using Electronic Feedback 9. Learning and Teaching in Action. http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/ltia/issue4/denton.shtml (accessed October 14, 2010).
9. Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M. and Rowe, P. 2008. Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3): 486-500.
10. Ding, L. 1998. Revisiting assessment and learning: Implications of students' perspectives on assessment feedback. Paper presented at Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 25-26, in Dundee, UK.
11. Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. 1983. Understanding student learning, London: Croom Helm.
12. Falchikov, N. 2001. Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
13. Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. 2004. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1: 3-31.
14. Gipps, C.V. 2005. What is the role for ICT-based assessment in universities?. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2): 171-80.
15. HEFCE. 2007. 2007 Teaching Quality Information Data. Higher Education Funding Council for England. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/nss/data/2007/ (accessed October 14, 2010).
16. Hepplestone, S., G. Holden, B. Irwin, H. J. Parkin, and L. Thorpe 2011. Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology 19, no. 2: 115-125.
17. Hepplestone, S. and R. Mather. 2007. Meeting rising student expectations of online assignment submission and online feedback. In Proceedings of the 11th international computer-assisted assessment conference 2007. http://www.caaconference.co.uk/pastConferences/2007/proceedings/Hepplestone%20S%20Mather%20R%20n1_formatted.pdf (accessed October 14, 2010).
18. Hounsell, D., R. Xu, and C.M. Tai. 2007. Monitoring Students' Experiences of Assessment (Scottish Enhancement Themes: Guides to Integrative Assessment, no. 1). Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/publications/ (accessed October 14, 2010).
19. Jones, D., and S. Behrens. 2003. Online assignment management: An evolutionary tale. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, ed. IEEE Computer Society. Hawaii, USA.
20. Maclellan, E. 2001. Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4): 307-18.
21. Mutch, A. 2003. Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(24): 24-38.
22. Nicol, D. 2007. Improving assessment after the task. Re-Engineering Assessment Practices in Scottish Education (REAP) Online Resources. http://www.reap.ac.uk/nss/nssAfter02.html (accessed October 14, 2010).
23. Parkin., H. and L. Thorpe. 2009. Exploring student experiences of e-learning: A phenomenographic approach. Paper presented at BERA Annual Conference, September 2-5, in Manchester, UK.
24. Potts, D. 1992. Case study: You can't teach those things to rats. A case for neither grading nor failing students. Educational and Training Technology International, 29(4): 296-309.
25. Price, B. and Petre, M. 1997. "Teaching programming through paperless assignments: An empirical evaluation of instructor feedback". In Proceedings of the 2nd conference on integrating technology into computer science education, Edited by: Miller, J.E. and Davies, G. 94-99. Sweden: Uppsala.
26. Price, M., and B. O'Donovan. 2008. Feedback-All that effort, but what is the effect? Paper presented at EARLI/Northumbria Assessment Conference. August 27-29, in Potsdam, Germany.
27. Winter, C., and V.L. Dye. 2004. An investigation into the reasons why students do not collect marked assignments and the accompanying feedback. University of Wolverhampton. http://wlv.openrepository.com/wlv/bitstream/2436/3780/1/An%20investigation%20pgs%20133-141.pdf (accessed October 14, 2010).