Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge

Higher Education

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 243-258

  Ibabe, Izaskun ^a   Jauregizar, Joana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Formative assessment; Metacognition; Motivation; Online self assessment; Perceived learning; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951137619     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-009-9245-6     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ausubel, N. H. (1983). Psicología educativa: Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. México: Trillas.
2. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252. doi: 10. 1207/s1532690xci1302_3.
3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Setting the stage for effective teaching. In J. Biggs & C. Tang (Eds.), Teaching for quality learning at University (3rd ed., pp. 31-59). England & NY: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
4. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-144.
5. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457. doi: 10. 1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2.
6. Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical assessment. Research Evaluation, 8(9), http://PAREonline. net/getvn. asp?v=8& n=9 Accessed 6 Aug 2008.
7. Boud, D. (1991). Implementing student self-assessment. HERDSA green guide (2nd ed.). Sydney: HERDSA.
8. Boud, D., & Brew, A. (1995). Developing a typology for learner self assessment practices. Research and development in Higher Education, 18, 130-135.
9. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students' formative and summative use of assessment information. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 153-169.
10. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In E. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
11. Campione, J. C. (1987). Metacognitive components of instructional research with problems learners. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 117-140). Hillsdale: LEA.
12. Carrasco, A., Gracia, E., & de la Iglesia, C. (2005). Las TIC en la construcción del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Dos experiencias docentes en Teoría Económica. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 36, 1-16.
13. Challis, D. (2005). Committing to quality learning through adaptive online assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 519-527. doi: 10. 1080/02602930500187030.
14. Collis, B., De-Boer, W., & Slotman, K. (2001). Feedback for web-based assignments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 306-313. doi: 10. 1046/j. 0266-4909. 2001. 00185. x.
15. Falchicov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430.
16. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge.
17. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillslade, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary-school pupils. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407-417.
19. Glenberg, A. M., Wlkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 579-602.
20. Gómez Alvarez, L. (2006). Respeto por los estilos de aprendizaje y otros principios de práctica docente efectiva: Modelo para curso on-line centrado en el estudiante. Paper presented at II Congreso Internacional de Estilos de Aprendizaje, Chile.
21. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
22. Higgins, L., Flower, L., & Petraglia, J. (1992). Planning text together: The role of critical reflection in student collaboration. Written Communication, 9(l), 48-84. doi: 10. 1177/0741088392009001002.
23. Honkimaki, S., Tynjala, P., & Valkonen, S. (2004). University students' study orientations, learning experiences and study success in innovative courses. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 431-449. doi: 10. 1080/0307507042000236353.
24. Imel, S. (2002). Metacognitive skills for adult learning. Trends and issues alert no 39. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
25. Kennedy, J. K., Sang, J. C. K., Wai-ming, F. Y., & Fok, P. K. (2006). Assessment for productive learning: Forms of assessment and their potential for enhancing learning. Paper presented at the 32 Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Singapore.
26. Lowry, R. (2005). Computer-aided self assessment-an effective tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(4), 198-203.
27. Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280-296. doi: 10. 1037/0021-9010. 67. 3. 280.
28. Martínez, R. J., & Moreno, R. (2007). Validity of academic work indicators in the projected European Higher Area. Higher Education, 53, 739-747. doi: 10. 1007/s10734-005-4507-4.
29. Marzano, R. J., Norford, J. S., Paynter, D. E., Pickering, D. J., & Gaddy, B. B. (2001). Handbook for classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
30. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209-220. doi: 10. 1080/0969594032000121289.
31. McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y., & Smith, D. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan (National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning [NCRIPTL]).
32. Moore, D., Lin-Agler, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2005). A source of metacomprehension inaccuracy. Reading Psychology: An International Journal, 26, 251-265. doi: 10. 1080/02702710590962578.
33. Nicol, D., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi: 10. 1080/03075070600572090.
34. Nota, L., Sorei, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Self-regulation and academia and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 198-251. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijer. 2005. 07. 001.
35. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Tools for the teacher. In F. Lockwood & A. Gooley (Eds.), Issues and innovations in distance education (pp. 138-149). London: Bogan Page.
36. Peat, M., & Franklin, S. (2002). Supporting student learning. The use of computer-based formative assessment modules. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 515-523. doi: 10. 1111/1467-8535. 00288.
37. Pickard, M. J. (2007). The new Bloom's taxonomy: An overview for family and consumer sciences. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 25(1), 45-55.
38. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 220. doi: 10. 1207/s15430421tip4104_3.
39. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
40. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. doi: 10. 1037/0022-0663. 82. 1. 33.
41. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Merrill.
42. Plous, S. (2000). Tips on creating and maintaining an educational World Wide Web site. Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.), 27, 63-70. doi: 10. 1207/S15328023TOP2701_13.
43. Quinn, D., & Reid, I. (2003). Using innovative online quizzes to assist learning. http://ausweb. scu. edu. au/aw03/papers/quinn/paper. html. Accessed 6 Aug 2008.
44. Ricketts, C., & Wilks, S. J. (2002). Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: Insights from recent research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 475-479. doi: 10. 1080/0260293022000009348.
45. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). Designing for metacognition-applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2-3), 125-140. doi: 10. 1007/s11409-007-9010-0.
46. Rosario, P., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., Almeida, L., Soares, S., & Rubio, M. (2005). El aprendizaje escolar examinado desde la perspectiva del 'Modelo 3P' de J. Biggs. Psicothema, 17(1), 20-30.
47. Rotger, B. (1990). Evaluación formativa. Madrid: Cincel.
48. Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 7-13. doi: 10. 1016/j. iheduc. 2008. 10. 002.
49. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. doi: 10. 1007/BF00117714.
50. Schofield, N. J., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Position location on topographical maps: Effects of task factors, training and strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 35-60. doi: 10. 1207/s1532690xci1201_2.
51. Scriven, M. S. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In: R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, 1. Chicago: Rand McNally.
52. Sherman, R. C. (1998). Using the World Wide Web to teach everyday applications of social psychology. Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.), 25, 212-216. doi: 10. 1207/s15328023top2503_15.
53. Taras, M. (2001). The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for student and for tutors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(9), 605-614. doi: 10. 1080/02602930120093922.
54. Taras, M. (2003). To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 549-565. doi: 10. 1080/02602930301678.
55. Taras, M. (2005). Assessment-summative and formative-some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466-478. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8527. 2005. 00307. x.
56. Vadhan, V., & Stander, P. (1994). Metacognitive ability and test performance among college students. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 307-309.
57. Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first-and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71-82. doi: 10. 1023/B: RIHE. 0000010047. 46814. 78.
58. Zimmerman, B. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217-221. doi: 10. 1207/s15326985ep3004_8.
59. Zulma, M. (2006). Aprendizaje autorregulado: El lugar de la cognición, la metacognición y la motivación. Estudios Pedagógicos, 32(2), 121-132.