메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 232-247

The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback

Author keywords

formative peer assessment; peer feedback; peer review; use of peer feedback

Indexed keywords


EID: 84921385584     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.898737     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (44)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 33847185210 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Learning to Write in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions of an Intervention in Developing Understanding of Assessment Criteria
    • Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2007. “Learning to Write in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions of an Intervention in Developing Understanding of Assessment Criteria.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (1): 77–89.10.1080/13562510601102180
    • (2007) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.12 , Issue.1 , pp. 77-89
    • Bloxham, S.1    West, A.2
  • 2
    • 34250028953 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating Written Feedback
    • Bryan C., Clegg K., (eds), London: Routledge
    • Brown, E., and C. Glover. 2006. “Evaluating Written Feedback.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 81–91. London: Routledge.
    • (2006) Innovative Assessment in Higher Education , pp. 81-91
    • Brown, E.1    Glover, C.2
  • 3
    • 79955568604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Exploring the Use of Peer Assessment as a Vehicle for Closing the Gap between Feedback Given and Feedback Used
    • Cartney, P. 2010. “Exploring the Use of Peer Assessment as a Vehicle for Closing the Gap between Feedback Given and Feedback Used.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 551–564.10.1080/02602931003632381
    • (2010) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.35 , Issue.5 , pp. 551-564
    • Cartney, P.1
  • 4
    • 77949874569 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing
    • Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2010. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 328–338.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
    • (2010) Learning and Instruction , vol.20 , Issue.4 , pp. 328-338
    • Cho, K.1    MacArthur, C.2
  • 6
    • 79961167787 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments
    • Cho, Y. H., and K. Cho. 2011. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments.” Instructional Science 39 (5): 629–643.10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
    • (2011) Instructional Science , vol.39 , Issue.5 , pp. 629-643
    • Cho, Y.H.1    Cho, K.2
  • 7
    • 51549117816 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is It worth the Effort? How Feedback Influences Students’ Subsequent Submission of Assessable Work
    • Crisp, B. R. 2007. “Is It worth the Effort? How Feedback Influences Students’ Subsequent Submission of Assessable Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (5): 571–581.10.1080/02602930601116912
    • (2007) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.32 , Issue.5 , pp. 571-581
    • Crisp, B.R.1
  • 8
    • 79955513797 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘Feed‐forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments
    • Duncan, N. 2007. “‘Feed‐forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (3): 271–283.10.1080/02602930600896498
    • (2007) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.32 , Issue.3 , pp. 271-283
    • Duncan, N.1
  • 9
    • 21844500642 scopus 로고
    • Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment
    • Falchikov, N. 1995. “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International 32 (2): 175–187.10.1080/1355800950320212
    • (1995) Innovations in Education and Training International , vol.32 , Issue.2 , pp. 175-187
    • Falchikov, N.1
  • 10
    • 84887992169 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are the Principles of Effective Feedback Transferable across Disciplines? A Comparative Study of Written Assignment Feedback in Languages and Technology
    • Fernández-Toro, M., M. Truman, and M. Walker. 2013. “Are the Principles of Effective Feedback Transferable across Disciplines? A Comparative Study of Written Assignment Feedback in Languages and Technology.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 816–830.10.1080/02602938.2012.724381
    • (2013) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.38 , Issue.7 , pp. 816-830
    • Fernández-Toro, M.1    Truman, M.2    Walker, M.3
  • 11
    • 0002689016 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ Views
    • Hanrahan, S. J., and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ Views.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1): 53–70.10.1080/07294360123776
    • (2001) Higher Education Research and Development , vol.20 , Issue.1 , pp. 53-70
    • Hanrahan, S.J.1    Isaacs, G.2
  • 12
    • 0036486748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment Feedback in Student Learning
    • Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2002. “The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment Feedback in Student Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 53–64.10.1080/03075070120099368
    • (2002) Studies in Higher Education , vol.27 , Issue.1 , pp. 53-64
    • Higgins, R.1    Hartley, P.2    Skelton, A.3
  • 13
    • 79954622172 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Students’ Perceptions about Peer Assessment for Writing: Their Origin and Impact on Revision Work
    • Kaufman, J. H., and C. D. Schunn. 2011. “Students’ Perceptions about Peer Assessment for Writing: Their Origin and Impact on Revision Work.” Instructional Science 39 (3): 387–406.10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
    • (2011) Instructional Science , vol.39 , Issue.3 , pp. 387-406
    • Kaufman, J.H.1    Schunn, C.D.2
  • 14
    • 77951102001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback
    • Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3): 525–536.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-3
    • (2010) British Journal of Educational Technology , vol.41 , Issue.3 , pp. 525-536
    • Li, L.1    Liu, X.2    Steckelberg, A.L.3
  • 15
    • 33749331250 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment
    • Liu, N.-F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
    • (2006) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.11 , Issue.3 , pp. 279-290
    • Liu, N.-F.1    Carless, D.2
  • 16
    • 84890351536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective
    • Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
    • (2014) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.39 , Issue.1 , pp. 102-122
    • Nicol, D.1    Thomson, A.2    Breslin, C.3
  • 17
    • 4544292276 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Implementation of a Formative Assessment Model Incorporating Peer and Self-assessment
    • Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and A. Callaghan. 2004. “Implementation of a Formative Assessment Model Incorporating Peer and Self-assessment.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (3): 273–290.10.1080/14703290410001733294
    • (2004) Innovations in Education and Teaching International , vol.41 , Issue.3 , pp. 273-290
    • Orsmond, P.1    Merry, S.2    Callaghan, A.3
  • 18
    • 84866053233 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘Some Kind of Weird, Evil Experiment’: Student Perceptions of Peer Assessment
    • Patton, C. 2012. “‘Some Kind of Weird, Evil Experiment’: Student Perceptions of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (6): 719–731.
    • (2012) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.37 , Issue.6 , pp. 719-731
    • Patton, C.1
  • 19
    • 84858425594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement
    • Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896.10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
    • (2011) Studies in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.8 , pp. 879-896
    • Price, M.1    Handley, K.2    Millar, J.3
  • 20
    • 54149102248 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Listening to Students: How to Make Written Assessment Feedback Useful
    • Rae, A. M., and D. K. Cochrane. 2008. “Listening to Students: How to Make Written Assessment Feedback Useful.” Active Learning in Higher Education 9 (3): 217–230.10.1177/1469787408095847
    • (2008) Active Learning in Higher Education , vol.9 , Issue.3 , pp. 217-230
    • Rae, A.M.1    Cochrane, D.K.2
  • 21
    • 77949873085 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?
    • Strijbos, J.-W., S. Narciss, and K. Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
    • (2010) Learning and Instruction , vol.20 , Issue.4 , pp. 291-303
    • Strijbos, J.-W.1    Narciss, S.2    Dünnebier, K.3
  • 22
    • 61449184495 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Assessment
    • Topping, K. J. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 20–27.10.1080/00405840802577569
    • (2009) Theory into Practice , vol.48 , Issue.1 , pp. 20-27
    • Topping, K.J.1
  • 23
    • 70350352274 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Investigation into Written Comments on Assignments: Do Students Find Them Usable?
    • Walker, M. 2009. “An Investigation into Written Comments on Assignments: Do Students Find Them Usable?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 67–78.10.1080/02602930801895752
    • (2009) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.34 , Issue.1 , pp. 67-78
    • Walker, M.1
  • 24
    • 79955560841 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Impact of Formative Feedback on the Development of Academic Writing
    • Wingate, U. 2010. “The Impact of Formative Feedback on the Development of Academic Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 519–533.10.1080/02602930903512909
    • (2010) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.35 , Issue.5 , pp. 519-533
    • Wingate, U.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.