Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled

Assessing Writing

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 22-41

  Stern, Lesa A ^a   Solomon, Amanda ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^b ELMHURST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective grading; Faculty feedback; Teacher comments; Writing assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646003533     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Banta T.W. Building a scholarship of assessment (2002), Jossey-Boss, San Francisco
2. Bellah, M. (1995). New Frontiers: Teacher comments, invention, and the new rhetoric. Rhetorical invention and Postmodern Writing Instruction. Retrieved from http://english.ttu.edu/courses/5361/book/bellah.htm.
3. Billings, S. J. (1998, April). The story of shifting perspectives: How instructors and students construct and use instructors' comments on drafts and final versions. Paper presented at 49th NCTE, Chicago, IL.
4. Brooks, B. (2000, July 28). Responding to student writing: Action research project. Retrieved from http://info.csd.org/WWW/resources/arc/report/0005.html.
5. Connors R.J., and Lunsford A.A. Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication 39 4 (1988) 395-409
6. Connors R.J., and Lunsford A.A. Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication 44 (1993) 200-223
7. Costello, C., & Blakesley, D. (2001). Integrating written, oral, visual, and electronic communication across the curriculum: A guide for faculty and graduate teaching assistants. Communication across the curriculum task force manual. Carbonale, IL: Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Retrieved from http://siu.edu/departments/cac.
8. Daiker D.A. Learning to praise. In: Anson C.A. (Ed). Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (1989), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL 103-113
9. Daiker D.A., Fuller M., Morenberg M., and Ziegler J. Evaluating high school writing: What are teachers really looking for?. Writing Program Administration 10 1-2 (1986) 27-42
10. Giffin C.W. Theory of responding to student writing: The state of the art. College Composition and Communication 33 (1982) 296-301
11. Halden-Sullivan J. Reconsidering assessment: From checklist to dialectic. Assessing Writing 3 (1996) 173-195
12. Haswell R.H. Minimal marking. College English 45 (1983) 600-604
13. Huot, B. (2001, February 2). How do I know what to say? Responding to student writing and other ways to make writing more manageable and useful in content area classes. Presentation to the faculty at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, IL.
14. Huot B. (Re)Articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning (2002), Utah State University Press, Logan, UT
15. Hyland F. Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31 (2003) 217-230
16. Knight P.T. Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education 27 3 (2002) 275-286
17. Konold H.E., Miller S.P., and Konold K.B. Using teacher feedback to enhance student learning. Teaching Exceptional Children 36 6 (2004) 64-69
18. LaFontana V.R. Throw away that correcting pen. English Journal 85 (1996) 71-73
19. Lee I. L2 writing teachers' perspectives practices, and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing 8 3 (2003) 216-237
20. Murphy S. A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room?. Assessing Writing 7 1 (2000) 79-90
21. Puhr K., and Workman G. Monitoring student progress through a conferenced writing program. English Journal 81 (1992) 49-50
22. Richardson S. Students' conditioned response to teachers' response: Portfolio proponents, take note!. Assessing Writing 7 2 (2000) 117-141
23. Rutz C., and Lauer-Glebov J. Assessment and innovation: One darn thing leads to another. Assessing Writing 10 2 (2005) 80-99
24. Sill, D., Eder, D., Stern, L., Thomas, S., & Denhouter, J. (2003). The convergence of assessment and scholarship of teaching and learning. A Collection of Papers on Self-Study on Institutional Improvement, Promoting Student Learning and Effective Teaching, 3, 8-12.
25. Sommers N. Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication 33 (1982) 148-156
26. Stitt-Bergh, M. (2005). Grammar: Getting students to turn in edited & proofread papers. Manoa Writing Program. Retrieved from http://mwp01.mwp.hawaii.edu/resources.
27. Straub R. Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English 31 (1997) 91-119
28. Straub R.E. Reading and responding to student writing: A heuristic for reflective practice. Composition Studies 30 1 (2002) 15-60
29. Welsh J.F., and Metcalf J. Cultivating faculty support for institutional effectiveness activities: Benchmarking best practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28 1 (2003) 33-45
30. White E.M. Assigning, responding, evaluating (1994), St. Martin's, New York
31. White E.M. Teaching and assessing writing (1994), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
32. Wiggins G. Feedback: How learning occurs. In: Chaffee E.E. (Ed). Assessing impact: Evidence and action (1997), American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC 31-39
33. Writing Matters, Manoa Writing Program. (1997-2005). Retrieved from http://mwp01.mwp.hawaii.edu/resources.
34. Wyatt-Smith C. Reading for assessment: How teachers ascribe meaning and value to student writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 6 (1999) 195-224
35. Zinn A. Ideas in practice: Assessing writing in the developmental classroom. Journal of Developmental Education 22 (1998) 28-34