INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion

Nature Protocols

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 991-1014

  Brodkorb, André ^a   Egger, Lotti ^b   Alminger, Marie ^c   Alvito, Paula ^d   Assunção, Ricardo ^d   Ballance, Simon ^e   Bohn, Torsten ^f   Bourlieu Lacanal, Claire ^g   Boutrou, Rachel ^h   Carrière, Frédéric ⁱ   Clemente, Alfonso ^j   Corredig, Milena ^k   Dupont, Didier ^h   Dufour, Claire ^l   Edwards, Cathrina ^m   Golding, Matt ⁿ   Karakaya, Sibel ^o   Kirkhus, Bente ^e   Le Feunteun, Steven ^h   Lesmes, Uri ^p   Macierzanka, Adam ^q   Mackie, Alan R ^r   Martins, Carla ^d   Marze, Sébastien ^s   McClements, David Julian ^t   Ménard, Olivia ^h   Minekus, Mans ^u   Portmann, Reto ^b   Santos, Cláudia N ^v,w   Souchon, Isabelle ^x   Singh, R Paul ^y   Vegarud, Gerd E ^z   Wickham, Martin S J ^aa   Weitschies, Werner ^ab   Recio, Isidra ^ac   more..

^a TEAGASC FOOD RESEARCH CENTRE   (Ireland)

^b AGROSCOPE   (Switzerland)

^c CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^e NOFIMA   (Norway)

^f LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF HEALTH   (Luxembourg)

^g MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^h AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

ⁱ CNRS   (France)

^j CSIC   (Spain)

^k AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^l UMR A 408 INRA University of Avignon   (France)

^m INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^o EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^p TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^q GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^r UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^s INRA   (France)

^t UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^u TNO Triskelion BV   (Netherlands)

^v INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA EXPERIMENTAL E TECNOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^w INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGIA QUÍMICA E BIOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^x AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^y UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^z NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^aa Reacta Biotech Limited   (United Kingdom)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^ac INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE RESEARCH CIAL   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; AMYLASE; CARBOHYDRATE DERIVATIVE; FATTY ACID DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; TRACE ELEMENT; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE; TRYPSIN; AMINO ACID; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; FATTY ACID; FOOD INGREDIENT; OLIGOSACCHARIDE; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT;

AMINO ACID METABOLISM; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYME MECHANISM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD PROCESSING; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT FUNCTION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN METABOLISM; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; STANDARDIZATION; BILE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; EATING; ENZYMOLOGY; FOOD; HUMAN; HYDROLYSIS; INTESTINE; METABOLISM; MOUTH; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; SALIVA; STANDARDS; STOMACH; STOMACH JUICE;

AMINO ACIDS; BILE; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; DIGESTION; EATING; ENZYME ASSAYS; FATTY ACIDS; FOOD; FOOD INGREDIENTS; GASTRIC JUICE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROLYSIS; INTESTINES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOUTH; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; SALIVA; STOMACH;

EID: 85063625000     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. WHO. Global Health Observatory—World Health Statistics 172 pp (WHO, Geneva, 2013).
2. Sullivan, L. M. et al. Gastric digestion of α-lactalbumin in adult human subjects using capsule endoscopy and nasogastric tube sampling. Br. J. Nutr. 112, 638–646 (2014).
3. Boutrou, R. et al. Sequential release of milk protein–derived bioactive peptides in the jejunum in healthy humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 1314–1323 (2013).
4. Mackie, A. R., Rafiee, H., Malcolm, P., Salt, L. & van Aken, G. Specific food structures supress appetite through reduced gastric emptying rate. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 304, G1038–G1043 (2013).
5. Koziolek, M. et al. Intragastric pH and pressure profiles after intake of the high-caloric, high-fat meal as used for food effect studies. J. Control. Release 220, 71–78 (2015).
6. Minekus, M., Marteau, P., Havenaar, R. & Huis In’t Veld, J. H. J. A multicompartmental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small intestine. Altern. Lab. Anim. 23, 197–209 (1995).
7. Wickham, M., Faulks, R. & Mills, C. In vitro digestion methods for assessing the effect of food structure on allergen breakdown. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 53, 952–958 (2009).
8. Ménard, O. et al. Validation of a new in vitro dynamic system to simulate infant digestion. Food Chem. 145, 1039–1045 (2014).
9. Molly, K., Woestyne, M. V. & Verstraete, W. Development of a 5-step multi-chamber reactor as a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39, 254–258 (1993).
10. Kong, F. & Singh, R. P. A human gastric simulator (HGS) to study food digestion in human stomach. J. Food Sci. 75, E627–E635 (2010).
11. Dupont, D. et al. Can dynamic in vitro digestion systems mimic the physiological reality? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1-17, 10.1080/10408398.2017.1421900 (2018).
12. Kaukonen, A. M., Boyd, B. J., Charman, W. N. & Porter, C. J. Drug solubilization behavior during in vitro digestion of suspension formulations of poorly water-soluble drugs in triglyceride lipids. Pharm. Res. 21, 254–260 (2004).
13. Maldonado-Valderrama, J., Gunning, A. P., Wilde, P. J. & Morris, V. J. In vitro gastric digestion of interfacial protein structures: visualisation by AFM. Soft Matter 6, 4908–4915 (2010).
14. Boisen, S. & Fernández, J. A. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 68, 277–286 (1997).
15. Bohn, T. et al. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo data on food digestion. What can we predict with static in vitro digestion models? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 58, 2239–2261 (2017).
16. Sanchón, J. et al. Protein degradation and peptide release from milk proteins in human jejunum. Comparison with in vitro gastrointestinal simulation. Food Chem. 239, 486–494 (2018).
17. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc. The United States Pharmacopeia 26, The National Formulary 21 (USP 26/NF21) (The United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc., Rockville, MD, 2003).
18. McCarthy, C. A. et al. In vitro dissolution models for the prediction of in vivo performance of an oral mesoporous silica formulation. J. Control. Release 250, 86–95 (2017).
19. Griffin, B. T. et al. Comparison of in vitro tests at various levels of complexity for the prediction of in vivo performance of lipid-based formulations: case studies with fenofibrate. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 86, 427–437 (2014).
20. Oomen, A. G. et al. Development of an in vitro digestion model for estimating the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 44, 0281–0287 (2003).
21. Versantvoort, C. H. M., Oomen, A. G., Van de Kamp, E., Rompelberg, C. J. M. & Sips, A. J. A. M. Applicability of an in vitro digestion model in assessing the bioaccessibility of mycotoxins from food. Food Chem. Toxicol. 43, 31–40 (2005).
22. Wragg, J. et al. Inter-Laboratory Trial of a Unified Bioaccessibility Testing Procedure. Chemical & Biological Hazards Programme. Open Report OR/07/027 (2009); http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/7491/1/OR07027.pdf
23. Dressman, J. B. et al. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) pH in young, healthy men and women. Pharm. Res. 7, 756–761 (1990).
24. Lentner, C. Geigy Scientific Tables. Vol. 1, Units of Measurement, Body Fluids, Composition of the Body, Nutrition 8th edn (Ciba-Geigy, Basel, Switzerland, 1981).
25. Hur, S. J., Lim, B. O., Decker, E. A. & McClements, D. J. In vitro human digestion models for food applications. Food Chem. 125, 1–12 (2011).
26. Dupont, D. et al. An international network for improving health properties of food by sharing our knowledge on the digestive process. Food Digestion 2, 23–25 (2011).
27. Minekus, M. et al. A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food—an international consensus. Food Funct. 5, 1113–1124 (2014).
28. Egger, L. et al. The harmonized INFOGEST in vitro digestion method: from knowledge to action. Food Res. Int. 88, 217–225 (2016).
29. Egger, L. et al. Physiological comparability of the harmonized INFOGEST in vitro digestion method to in vivo pig digestion. Food Res. Int. 102, 567–574 (2017).
30. Hempel, J. et al. Ultrastructural deposition forms and bioaccessibility of carotenoids and carotenoid esters from goji berries (Lycium barbarum L.). Food Chem. 218, 525–533 (2017).
31. Rodrigues, D. B., Mariutti, L. R. B. & Mercadante, A. Z. An in vitro digestion method adapted for carotenoids and carotenoid esters: moving forward towards standardization. Food Funct. 7, 4992–5001 (2016).
32. Bot, F. et al. The effect of pulsed electric fields on carotenoids bioaccessibility: the role of tomato matrix. Food Chem. 240, 415–421 (2018).
33. Gomez-Mascaraque, L. G., Perez-Masia, R., Gonzalez-Barrio, R., Periago, M. J. & Lopez-Rubio, A. Potential of microencapsulation through emulsion-electrospraying to improve the bioaccesibility of beta-carotene. Food Hydrocoll. 73, 1–12 (2017).
34. Davidov-Pardo, G., Perez-Ciordia, S., Marin-Arroyo, M. R. & McClements, D. J. Improving resveratrol bioaccessibility using biopolymer nanoparticles and complexes: impact of protein–carbohydrate maillard conjugation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63, 3915–3923 (2015).
35. Ferreira-Lazarte, A. et al. Study on the digestion of milk with prebiotic carbohydrates in a simulated gastrointestinal model. J. Funct. Foods 33, 149–154 (2017).
36. El, S. N. et al. In vitro digestibility of goat milk and kefir with a new standardised static digestion method (INFOGEST cost action) and bioactivities of the resultant peptides. Food Funct. 6, 2322–2330 (2015).
37. Wang, B., Timilsena, Y. P., Blanch, E. & Adhikari, B. Mild thermal treatment and in-vitro digestion of three forms of bovine lactoferrin: effects on functional properties. Int. Dairy J. 64, 22–30 (2017).
38. Naegeli, H. et al. Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J. 15, e04862 (2017).
39. Mamone, G. et al. Tracking the fate of pasta (T. durum semolina) immunogenic proteins by in vitro simulated digestion. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 63, 2660–2667 (2015).
40. Korte, R., Bracker, J. & Brockmeyer, J. Gastrointestinal digestion of hazelnut allergens on molecular level: elucidation of degradation kinetics and resistant immunoactive peptides using mass spectrometry. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61, 1700130 (2017).
41. Di Stasio, L. et al. Peanut digestome: identification of digestion resistant IgE binding peptides. Food Chem. Toxicol. 107, 88–98 (2017).
42. Mat, D. J. L., Le Feunteun, S., Michon, C. & Souchon, I. In vitro digestion of foods using pH-stat and the INFOGEST protocol: Impact of matrix structure on digestion kinetics of macronutrients, proteins and lipids. Food Res. Int. 88, Part B. 226–233 (2016).
43. Floury, J. et al. Exploring the breakdown of dairy protein gels during in vitro gastric digestion using time-lapse synchrotron deep-UV fluorescence microscopy. Food Chem. 239, 898–910 (2018).
44. Sarkar, A. et al. In vitro digestion of Pickering emulsions stabilized by soft whey protein microgel particles: influence of thermal treatment. Soft Matter 12, 3558–3569 (2016).
45. Fernandez-Avila, C., Arranz, E., Guri, A., Trujillo, A. & Corredig, M. Vegetable protein isolate-stabilized emulsions for enhanced delivery of conjugated linoleic acid in Caco-2 cells. Food Hydrocoll. 55, 144–154 (2016).
46. Yang, J., Primo, C., Elbaz-Younes, I. & Hirschi, K. D. Bioavailability of transgenic microRNAs in genetically modified plants. Genes Nutr. 12, 17 (2017).
47. Aschoff, J. K. et al. Bioavailability of beta-cryptoxanthin is greater from pasteurized orange juice than from fresh oranges—a randomized cross-over study. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 59, 1896–1904 (2015).
48. Garrett, D. A., Failla, M. L. & Sarama, R. J. Development of an in vitro digestion method to assess carotenoid bioavailability from meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 4301–4309 (1999).
49. Mulet-Cabero, A. I., Rigby, N. M., Brodkorb, A. & Mackie, A. R. Dairy food structures influence the rates of nutrient digestion through different in vitro gastric behaviour. Food Hydrocoll. 67, 63–73 (2017).
50. Mulet-Cabero, A. I., Mackie, A., Wilde, P., Fenelon, M. A. & Brodkorb, A. Structural mechanism and kinetics of in vitro gastric digestion are affected by process-induced changes in bovine milk. Food Hydrocoll. 86, 172–183 (2019).
51. Roura, E. et al. Critical review evaluating the pig as a model for human nutritional physiology. Nutr. Res. Rev. 29, 60–90 (2016).
52. Le Huërou-Luron, I. et al. A mixture of milk and vegetable lipids in infant formula changes gut digestion, mucosal immunity and microbiota composition in neonatal piglets. Eur. J. Nutr. 57, 463–476 (2018).
53. Barbé, F. et al. The heat treatment and the gelation are strong determinants of the kinetics of milk proteins digestion and of the peripheral availability of amino acids. Food Chem. 136, 1203–1212 (2013).
54. Evenepoel, P. et al. Digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein in humans as assessed by stable isotope techniques. J. Nutr. 128, 1716–1722 (1998).
55. Normén, L. et al. Phytosterol and phytostanol esters are effectively hydrolysed in the gut and do not affect fat digestion in ileostomy subjects. Eur. J. Nutr. 45, 165–170 (2006).
56. Edwards, C. H. et al. Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102, 791–800 (2015).
57. Bakala N’Goma, J. C., Amara, S., Dridi, K., Jannin, V. & Carriere, F. Understanding the lipid-digestion processes in the GI tract before designing lipid-based drug-delivery systems. Ther. Deliv. 3, 105–124 (2012).
58. Gargouri, Y. et al. Importance of human gastric lipase for intestinal lipolysis: an in vitro study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 879, 419–423 (1986).
59. Ville, E., Carriere, F., Renou, C. & Laugier, R. Physiological study of pH stability and sensitivity to pepsin of human gastric lipase. Digestion 65, 73–81 (2002).
60. Carrière, F., Barrowman, J. A., Verger, R. & Laugier, R. Secretion and contribution to lipolysis of gastric and pancreatic lipases during a test meal in humans. Gastroenterology 105, 876–888 (1993).
61. Sams, L., Paume, J., Giallo, J. & Carriere, F. Relevant pH and lipase for in vitro models of gastric digestion. Food Funct. 7, 30–45 (2016).
62. Carrière, F. et al. The specific activities of human digestive lipases measured from the in vivo and in vitro lipolysis of test meals. Gastroenterology 119, 949–960 (2000).
63. Bakala-N’Goma, J. C. et al. Toward the establishment of standardized in vitro tests for lipid-based formulations. 5. Lipolysis of representative formulations by gastric lipase. Pharm. Res. 32, 1279–1287 (2015).
64. Capolino, P. et al. In vitro gastrointestinal lipolysis: replacement of human digestive lipases by a combination of rabbit gastric and porcine pancreatic extracts. Food Digestion 2, 43–51 (2011).
65. Moreau, H., Gargouri, Y., Lecat, D., Junien, J.-L. & Verger, R. Screening of preduodenal lipases in several mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 959, 247–252 (1988).
66. De Caro, J., Ferrato, F., Verger, R. & de Caro, A. Purification and molecular characterization of lamb pregastric lipase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1252, 321–329 (1995).
67. Sams, L. et al. Characterization of pepsin from rabbit gastric extract, its action on β-casein and the effects of lipids on proteolysis. Food Funct. 9, 5975–5988 (2018).
68. Rich, D. H. et al. Inhibition of aspartic proteases by pepstatin and 3-methylstatine derivatives of pepstatin. Evidence for collected-substrate enzyme inhibition. Biochemistry 24, 3165–3173 (1985).
69. Williams, H. D. et al. Toward the establishment of standardized in vitro tests for lipid-based formulations, part 1: method parameterization and comparison of in vitro digestion profiles across a range of representative formulations. J. Pharm. Sci. 101, 3360–3380 (2012).
70. Mat, D. J. L., Cattenoz, T., Souchon, I., Michon, C. & Le Feunteun, S. Monitoring protein hydrolysis by pepsin using pH-stat: in vitro gastric digestions in static and dynamic pH conditions. Food Chem. 239, 268–275 (2018).
71. Gargouri, Y. et al. Kinetic assay of human gastric lipase on short- and long-chain triacylglycerol emulsions. Gastroenterology 91, 919–925 (1986).
72. Moreau, H., Gargouri, Y., Lecat, D., Junien, J.-L. & Verger, R. Purification, characterization and kinetic properties of the rabbit gastric lipase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 960, 286–293 (1988).
73. Ménard, O. et al. A first step towards a consensus static in vitro model for simulating full-term infant digestion. Food Chem. 240, 338–345 (2018).
74. Lecomte, M. et al. Milk polar lipids affect in vitro digestive lipolysis and postprandial lipid metabolism in mice. J. Nutr. 145, 1770–1777 (2015).
75. Grundy, M. M. L. et al. The impact of oat structure and beta-glucan on in vitro lipid digestion. J. Funct. Foods 38, 378–388 (2017).
76. Salvia-Trujillo, L. et al. Lipid digestion, micelle formation and carotenoid bioaccessibility kinetics: influence of emulsion droplet size. Food Chem. 229, 653–662 (2017).
77. Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917 (1959).
78. Cavalier, J.-F. et al. Validation of lipolysis product extraction from aqueous/biological samples, separation and quantification by thin-layer chromatography with flame ionization detection analysis using O-cholesteryl ethylene glycol as a new internal standard. J. Chromatogr. A 1216, 6543–6548 (2009).
79. Carriere, F. et al. Purification and biochemical characterization of dog gastric lipase. FEBS J. 202, 75–83 (1991).
80. Bourlieu, C. et al. The structure of infant formulas impacts their lipolysis, proteolysis and disintegration during in vitro gastric digestion. Food Chem. 182, 224–235 (2015).
81. Chatzidaki, M. D., Mateos-Diaz, E., Leal-Calderon, F., Xenakis, A. & Carriere, F. Water-in-oil microemulsions versus emulsions as carriers of hydroxytyrosol: an in vitro gastrointestinal lipolysis study using the pHstat technique. Food Funct. 7, 2258–2269 (2016).
82. Tyssandier, V. et al. Processing of vegetable-borne carotenoids in the human stomach and duodenum. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 284, G913–G923 (2003).
83. Reboul, E. et al. Bioaccessibility of carotenoids and vitamin E from their main dietary sources. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 8749–8755 (2006).
84. Biehler, E., Kaulmann, A., Hoffmann, L., Krause, E. & Bohn, T. Dietary and host-related factors influencing carotenoid bioaccessibility from spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Food Chem. 125, 1328–1334 (2011).
85. Boon, C. S., McClements, D. J., Weiss, J. & Decker, E. A. Factors influencing the chemical stability of carotenoids in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 50, 515–532 (2010).
86. Jorgensen, E. M., Marin, A. B. & Kennedy, J. A. Analysis of the oxidative degradation of proanthocyanidins under basic conditions. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 52, 2292–2296 (2004).
87. Talcott, S. T. & Howard, L. R. Phenolic autoxidation is responsible for color degradation in processed carrot puree. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 47, 2109–2115 (1999).
88. Bermúdez-Soto, M. J., Tomás-Barberán, F. A. & García-Conesa, M. T. Stability of polyphenols in chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) subjected to in vitro gastric and pancreatic digestion. Food Chem. 102, 865–874 (2007).
89. Alminger, M. et al. In vitro models for studying secondary plant metabolite digestion and bioaccessibility. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 13, 413–436 (2014).
90. Bohn, T. et al. Mind the gap-deficits in our knowledge of aspects impacting the bioavailability of phytochemicals and their metabolites—a position paper focusing on carotenoids and polyphenols. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 59, 1307–1323 (2015).
91. Amiri, M. & Naim, H. Y. Characterization of mucosal disaccharidases from human intestine. Nutrients 9, 1106 (2017).
92. Bouayed, J., Deusser, H., Hoffmann, L. & Bohn, T. Bioaccessible and dialysable polyphenols in selected apple varieties following in vitro digestion vs. their native patterns. Food Chem. 131, 1466–1472 (2012).
93. Coates, E. M. et al. Colon-available raspberry polyphenols exhibit anti-cancer effects on in vitro models of colon cancer. J. Carcinog. 6, 4 (2007).
94. Figueira, I. et al. Blood–brain barrier transport and neuroprotective potential of blackberry-digested polyphenols: an in vitro study. Eur. J. Nutr. 10.1007/s00394-017-1576-y (2017)
95. Garcia, G. et al. Bioaccessible (poly)phenol metabolites from raspberry protect neural cells from oxidative stress and attenuate microglia activation. Food Chem. 215, 274–283 (2017).
96. Bohn, T. Bioactivity of carotenoids—chasms of knowledge. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 10, 1–5 (2016).
97. Levi, C. S. et al. Extending in vitro digestion models to specific human populations: Perspectives, practical tools and bio-relevant information. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 60, 52–63 (2017).
98. Picariello, G. et al. Peptides surviving the simulated gastrointestinal digestion of milk proteins: Biological and toxicological implications. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 878, 295–308 (2010).
99. Garcia-Campayo, V., Han, S., Vercauteren, R. & Franck, A. Digestion of food ingredients and food using an in vitro model integrating intestinal mucosal enzymes. Food Nutr. Sci. 9, 711–734 (2018).
100. Picariello, G., Ferranti, P. & Addeo, F. Use of brush border membrane vesicles to simulate the human intestinal digestion. Food Res. Int. 88, Part B. 327–335 (2016).
101. Cheeseman, C. I. & O’Neill, D. Isolation of intestinal brush-border membranes. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 30, 3.21.1–3.21.10 (2006).
102. Lin, X. J. & Wright, A. J. Pectin and gastric pH interactively affect DHA-rich emulsion in vitro digestion microstructure, digestibility and bioaccessibility. Food Hydrocoll. 76, 49–59 (2018).
103. Lorieau, L. et al. Impact of the dairy product structure and protein nature on the proteolysis and amino acid bioaccessiblity during in vitro digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 82, 399–411 (2018).
104. Macierzanka, A., Sancho, A., Mills, E. N. C., Rigby, N. & Mackie, A. Emulsification alters simulated gastrointestinal proteolysis of β-casein and β-lactoglobulin. Soft Matter 5, 538–550 (2009).
105. Carriere, F. et al. Inhibition of gastrointestinal lipolysis by Orlistat during digestion of test meals in healthy volunteers. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 281, G16–G28 (2001).
106. Edwards, C. H., Maillot, M., Parker, R. & Warren, F. J. A comparison of the kinetics of in vitro starch digestion in smooth and wrinkled peas by porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase. Food Chem. 244, 386–393 (2018).
107. Villemejane, C. et al. In vitro digestion of short-dough biscuits enriched in proteins and/or fibres using a multi-compartmental and dynamic system (2): protein and starch hydrolyses. Food Chem. 190, 164–172 (2016).
108. Romano, A. et al. Characterisation, in vitro digestibility and expected glycemic index of commercial starches as uncooked ingredients. J. Food Sci. Technol. 53, 4126–4134 (2016).
109. Bustos, M. C., Vignola, M. B., Perez, G. T. & Leon, A. E. In vitro digestion kinetics and bioaccessibility of starch in cereal food products. J. Cereal Sci. 77, 243–250 (2017).
110. Liu, J. Y. et al. Cellular uptake and trans-enterocyte transport of phenolics bound to vinegar melanoidins. J. Funct. Foods 37, 632–640 (2017).
111. Corte-Real, J., Richling, E., Hoffmann, L. & Bohn, T. Selective factors governing in vitro beta-carotene bioaccessibility: negative influence of low filtration cutoffs and alterations by emulsifiers and food matrices. Nutr. Res. 34, 1101–1110 (2014).
112. Hidalgo, A. et al. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties of pseudocereals-enriched water biscuits and their in vitro digestates. Food Chem. 240, 799–807 (2018).
113. Eratte, D., Dowling, K., Barrow, C. J. & Adhikari, B. P. In-vitro digestion of probiotic bacteria and omega-3 oil co-microencapsulated in whey protein isolate-gum Arabic complex coacervates. Food Chem. 227, 129–136 (2017).
114. Bottari, B. et al. Characterization of the peptide fraction from digested Parmigiano Reggiano cheese and its effect on growth of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 255, 32–41 (2017).
115. Sanchez-Moya, T. et al. In vitro modulation of gut microbiota by whey protein to preserve intestinal health. Food Funct. 8, 3053–3063 (2017).