A comparison of the kinetics of in vitro starch digestion in smooth and wrinkled peas by porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase

Food Chemistry

Volumn 244, Issue , 2018, Pages 386-393

  Edwards, Cathrina H ^a   Maillot, Marie ^a,b   Parker, Roger ^a   Warren, Frederick J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

LOS plots; Particle size; Pisum sativum L.; Rugosus locus; Starch digestibility

Indexed keywords

AMYLASES; KINETICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; PURIFICATION;

LARGER PARTICLE SIZES; LOS PLOTS; PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONS; PISUM SATIVUM L; RUGOSUS LOCUS; STARCH DIGESTIBILITIES; STARCH DIGESTIONS; STARCH STRUCTURE;

STARCH;

ALPHA AMYLASE PANCREAS ISOENZYME; STARCH; GELATIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; ENZYME KINETIC ASSAY; GELATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PEA; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT SEED; RUGOSUS GENE; ANIMAL; CELL WALL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOUR; FOOD HANDLING; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PIG;

ANIMALS; CELL WALL; DIGESTION; FLOUR; FOOD HANDLING; GELATIN; KINETICS; PANCREATIC ALPHA-AMYLASES; PARTICLE SIZE; PEAS; SEEDS; STARCH; SWINE;

EID: 85031744456     PISSN: 03088146     EISSN: 18737072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.042     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bhattacharyya, M., Martin, C., Smith, A., The importance of starch biosynthesis in the wrinkled seed shape character of peas studied by Mendel. Plant Molecular Biology 22:3 (1993), 525–531.
2. Bogracheva, T.Y., Cairns, P., Noel, T.R., Hulleman, S., Wang, T.L., Morris, V.J., Hedley, C.L., The effect of mutant genes at the r, rb, rug3, rug4, rug5 and lam loci on the granular structure and physico-chemical properties of pea seed starch. Carbohydrate Polymers 39:4 (1999), 303–314.
3. Bogracheva, T.Y., Davydova, N.I., Genin, Y.V., Hedley, C.L., Mutant genes at the r and rb loci affect the structure and physico-chemical properties of pea seed starches. Journal of Experimental Botany 46:293 (1995), 1905–1913.
4. Bogracheva, T.Y., Morris, V.J., Ring, S.G., Hedley, C.L., The granular structure of C-type pea starch and its role in gelatinization. Biopolymers 45:4 (1998), 323–332.
5. Bogracheva, T.Y., Wang, Y.L., Wang, T.L., Hedley, C.L., Structural studies of starches with different water contents. Biopolymers 64:5 (2002), 268–281.
6. Butterworth, P.J., Warren, F.J., Grassby, T., Patel, H., Ellis, P.R., Analysis of starch amylolysis using plots for first-order kinetics. Carbohydrate Polymers 87:3 (2012), 2189–2197.
7. Colonna, P., Mercier, C., Macromolecular structure of wrinkled- and smooth-pea starch components. Carbohydrate Research 126:2 (1984), 233–247.
8. Cooke, D., Gidley, M.J., Loss of crystalline and molecular order during starch gelatinisation: origin of the enthalpic transition. Carbohydrate Research 227 (1992), 103–112.
9. Dahl, W.J., Foster, L.M., Tyler, R.T., Review of the health benefits of peas (Pisum sativum L.). British Journal of Nutrition 108:S1 (2012), S3–S10.
10. Edwards, C.H., Grundy, M.M., Grassby, T., Vasilopoulou, D., Frost, G.S., Butterworth, P.J., Ellis, P.R., Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 102:4 (2015), 791–800.
11. Edwards, C.H., Warren, F.J., Campbell, G.M., Gaisford, S., Royall, P.G., Butterworth, P.J., Ellis, P.R., A study of starch gelatinisation behaviour in hydrothermally-processed plant food tissues and implications for in vitro digestibility. Food & Function 6:12 (2015), 3634–3641.
12. Edwards, C.H., Warren, F.J., Milligan, P.J., Butterworth, P.J., Ellis, P.R., A novel method for classifying starch digestion by modelling the amylolysis of plant foods using first-order enzyme kinetic principles. Food & Function 5:11 (2014), 2751–2758.
13. Foster-Powell, K., Holt, S.H., Brand-Miller, J.C., International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76:1 (2002), 5–56.
14. Golay, A., Coulston, A.M., Hollenbeck, C.B., Kaiser, L.L., Würsch, P., Reaven, G.M., Comparison of metabolic effects of white beans processed into two different physical forms. Diabetes Care 9:3 (1986), 260–266.
15. Grassby, T., Edwards, C.H., Grundy, M., Ellis, P.R., Functional components and mechanisms of action of ‘dietary fibre’ in the upper gastrointestinal tract: Implications for health. Harding, S.E., (eds.) Stability of complex carbohydrate structures: biofuels, foods, vaccines and shipwrecks, 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
16. Hedley, C.L., Bogracheva, T.Y., Wang, T.L., A genetic approach to studying the morphology, structure and function of starch granules using pea as a model. Starch - Stärke 54:6 (2002), 235–242.
17. Jenkins, D.J.A., Ghafari, H., Wolever, T.M.S., Taylor, R.H., Jenkins, A.L., Barker, H.M., Bowling, A.C., Relationship between rate of digestion of foods and post-prandial glycaemia. Diabetologia 22:6 (1982), 450–455.
18. Lever, M., A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Analytical Biochemistry 47:1 (1972), 273–279.
19. Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C.H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., Sedef, E., Grassby, T., Shewry, P.R., Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion and health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57:2 (2017), 237–253.
20. Noah, L., Guillon, F., Bouchet, B., Buleon, A., Molis, C., Gratas, M., Champ, M., Digestion of carbohydrate from white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in healthy humans. Journal of Nutrition 128 (1998), 977–985.
21. Panlasigui, L.N., Thompson, L.U., Juliano, B.O., Perez, C.M., Yiu, S.H., Greenberg, G.R., Rice varieties with similar amylose content differ in starch digestibility and glycemic response in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 54:5 (1991), 871–877.
22. Ranawana, V., Monro, J.A., Mishra, S., Henry, C.J.K., Degree of particle size breakdown during mastication may be a possible cause of interindividual glycemic variability. Nutrition Research 30:4 (2010), 246–254.
23. Ratnayake, W.S., Hoover, R., Warkentin, T., Pea starch: Composition, structure and properties — A review. Starch - Stärke 54:6 (2002), 217–234.
24. Smith, A.M., Major differences in isoforms of starch-branching enzyme between developing embryos of round- and wrinkled-seeded peas (Pisum sativum L.). Planta 175:2 (1988), 270–279.
25. Smith, A.M., The biosynthesis of starch granules. Biomacromolecules 2:2 (2001), 335–341.
26. Tahir, R., Ellis, P.R., Bogracheva, T.Y., Meares-Taylor, C., Butterworth, P.J., Study of the structure and properties of native and hydrothermally processed wild-type, lam and r variant pea starches that affect amylolysis of these starches. Biomacromolecules 12:1 (2011), 123–133.
27. Tahir, R., Ellis, P.R., Butterworth, P.J., The relation of physical properties of native starch granules to the kinetics of amylolysis catalysed by porcine pancreatic α-amylase. Carbohydrate Polymers 81:1 (2010), 57–62.
28. Teng, A., Witt, T., Wang, K., Li, M., Hasjim, J., Molecular rearrangement of waxy and normal maize starch granules during in vitro digestion. Carbohydrate Polymers 139 (2016), 10–19.
29. Waldron, K.W., Parker, M.L., Smith, A.C., Plant cell walls and food quality. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2:4 (2003), 128–146.
30. Wang, T.L., Bogracheva, T.Y., Hedley, C.L., Starch: as simple as A, B, C?. Journal of Experimental Botany 49:320 (1998), 481–502.
31. Wang, T.L., Hedley, C.L., Seed development in peas: knowing your three ‘r's (or four, or five). Seed Science Research 1 (1991), 3–14.
32. Warren, F.J., Royall, P.G., Gaisford, S., Butterworth, P.J., Ellis, P.R., Binding interactions of α-amylase with starch granules: The influence of supramolecular structure and surface area. Carbohydrate Polymers 86:2 (2011), 1038–1047.
33. Ze, X., Duncan, S.H., Louis, P., Flint, H.J., Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon. The ISME Journal 6:8 (2012), 1535–1543.