Emerging and evolving concepts in gene essentiality

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 34-49

  Rancati, Giulia ^a   Moffat, Jason ^b,c   Typas, Athanasios ^d   Pavelka, Norman ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL BIOLOGY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH   (Canada)

^d EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^e AGENCY FOR SCIENCE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLIED RESEARCH; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE EDITING; GENE ESSENTIALITY; GENE KNOCKDOWN; GENETIC BACKGROUND; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MUTAGENESIS; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RESISTANCE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DRUG RESISTANCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EDITING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, ESSENTIAL; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MODELS, GENETIC; SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY;

EID: 85038407683     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.74     Document Type: Review

References (208)

1. Clavijo, B. J. et al. An improved assembly and annotation of the allohexaploid wheat genome identifies complete families of agronomic genes and provides genomic evidence for chromosomal translocations. Genome Res. 27, 885–896 (2017).
2. Castle, W. E. & Little, C. C. On a modified Mendelian ratio among yellow mice. Science 32, 868–870 (1910).
3. Liu, S. J. et al. CRISPRi-based genome-scale identification of functional long noncoding RNA loci in human cells. Science 355, aah7111 (2017).
4. Lluch-Senar, M. et al. Defining a minimal cell: essentiality of small ORFs and ncRNAs in a genomereduced bacterium. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 780 (2015).
5. Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabasi, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41–42 (2001).
6. Joyce, A. R. & Palsson, B. O. Predicting gene essentiality using genome-scale in silico models. Methods Mol. Biol. 416, 433–457 (2008).
7. Hwang, Y. C. et al. Predicting essential genes based on network and sequence analysis. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1672–1678 (2009).
8. Ye, Y. N., Hua, Z. G., Huang, J., Rao, N. & Guo, F. B. CEG: a database of essential gene clusters. BMC Genomics 14, 769 (2013).
9. Wei, W., Ning, L. W., Ye, Y. N. & Guo, F. B. Geptop: a gene essentiality prediction tool for sequenced bacterial genomes based on orthology and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 8, e72343 (2013).
10. Jiang, P. et al. Network analysis of gene essentiality in functional genomics experiments. Genome Biol. 16, 239 (2015).
11. Horowitz, N. H. & Leupold, U. Some recent studies bearing on the one gene-one enzyme hypothesis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 16, 65–74 (1951).
12. Judd, B. H., Shen, M. W. & Kaufman, T. C. The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71, 139–156 (1972).
13. Judd, B. H., Shen, M. W. & Kaufman, T. C. The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71, 139–156 (1972).
14. Lefevre, G. Jr. The one band-one gene hypothesis: evidence from a cytogenetic analysis of mutant and nonmutant rearrangement breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 38, 591–599 (1974).
15. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
16. Goebl, M. G. & Petes, T. D. Most of the yeast genomic sequences are not essential for cell growth and division. Cell 46, 983–992 (1986).
17. Kleckner, N., Roth, J. & Botstein, D. Genetic engineering in vivo using translocatable drugresistance elements. New methods in bacterial genetics. J. Mol. Biol. 116, 125–159 (1977).
18. Anderson, S. Shotgun DNA sequencing using cloned DNase I-generated fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 3015–3027 (1981).
19. Sutton, G. G., White, O., Adams, M. D. & Kerlavage, A. R. TIGR Assembler: a new tool for assembling large shotgun sequencing projects. Genome Sci. Technol. 1, 9–19 (1995).
20. Fleischmann, R. D. et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269, 496–512 (1995).
21. Fraser, C. M. et al. The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 270, 397–403 (1995).
22. Goffeau, A. et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 546–567 (1996).
23. Blattner, F. R. et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277, 1453–1462 (1997).
24. Kunst, F. et al. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390, 249–256 (1997).
25. Hutchison, C. A. et al. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. Science 286, 2165–2169 (1999).
26. Smith, V., Botstein, D. & Brown, P. O. Genetic footprinting: a genomic strategy for determining a gene’s function given its sequence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6479–6483 (1995).
27. Sassetti, C. M., Boyd, D. H. & Rubin, E. J. Comprehensive identification of conditionally essential genes in mycobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12712–12717 (2001).
28. Akerley, B. J. et al. A genome-scale analysis for identification of genes required for growth or survival of Haemophilus influenzae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 966–971 (2002).
29. Jacobs, M. A. et al. Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14339–14344 (2003).
30. Salama, N. R., Shepherd, B. & Falkow, S. Global transposon mutagenesis and essential gene analysis of Helicobacter pylori. J. Bacteriol. 186, 7926–7935 (2004).
31. C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018 (1998).
32. Adams, M. D. et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195 (2000).
33. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 (2000).
34. Giaever, G. et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387–391 (2002).
35. Gerdes, S. Y. et al. Experimental determination and system level analysis of essential genes in Escherichia coli MG1655. J. Bacteriol. 185, 5673–5684 (2003).
36. van Opijnen, T. & Camilli, A. Transposon insertion sequencing: a new tool for systems-level analysis of microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 435–442 (2013).
37. Wetmore, K. M. et al. Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. mBio 6, e00306–e00315 (2015).
38. Baudin, A., Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O., Denouel, A., Lacroute, F. & Cullin, C. A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3329–3330 (1993).
39. Winzeler, E. A. et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).
40. Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 2006.0008 (2006).
41. Kim, D. U. et al. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 617–623 (2010).
42. Brochado, A. R. & Typas, A. High-throughput approaches to understanding gene function and mapping network architecture in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 16, 199–206 (2013).
43. Porwollik, S. et al. Defined single-gene and multi-gene deletion mutant collections in Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium. PLoS ONE 9, e99820 (2014).
44. Koo, B. M. et al. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst. 4, 291–305 e7 (2017).
45. Noble, S. M., French, S., Kohn, L. A., Chen, V. & Johnson, A. D. Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat. Genet. 42, 590–598 (2010).
46. Hickman, M. A. et al. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 494, 55–59 (2013).
47. Vasquez, K. M., Marburger, K., Intody, Z. & Wilson, J. H. Manipulating the mammalian genome by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8403–8410 (2001).
48. Evans, M. J. & Kaufman, M. H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156 (1981).
49. Martin, G. R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 7634–7638 (1981).
50. Thomas, K. R. & Capecchi, M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryoderived stem cells. Cell 51, 503–512 (1987).
51. Zijlstra, M., Li, E., Sajjadi, F., Subramani, S. & Jaenisch, R. Germ-line transmission of a disrupted β2-microglobulin gene produced by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature 342, 435–438 (1989).
52. Koller, B. H. & Smithies, O. Inactivating the β2-microglobulin locus in mouse embryonic stem cells by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8932–8935 (1989).
53. Austin, C. P. et al. The knockout mouse project. Nat. Genet. 36, 921–924 (2004).
54. Collins, F. S., Finnell, R. H., Rossant, J. & Wurst, W. A. A new partner for the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Cell 129, 235 (2007).
55. Bradley, A. et al. The mammalian gene function resource: the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Mamm. Genome 23, 580–586 (2012).
56. White, J. K. et al. Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell 154, 452–464 (2013).
57. Hrabe de Angelis, M. et al. Analysis of mammalian gene function through broad-based phenotypic screens across a consortium of mouse clinics. Nat. Genet. 47, 969–978 (2015).
58. Dickinson, M. E. et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537, 508–514 (2016).
59. Napoli, C., Lemieux, C. & Jorgensen, R. Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 2, 279–289 (1990).
60. Fire, A., Albertson, D., Harrison, S. W. & Moerman, D. G. Production of antisense RNA leads to effective and specific inhibition of gene expression in C. elegans muscle. Development 113, 503–514 (1991).
61. Guo, S. & Kemphues, K. J. par 1, a gene required for establishing polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a putative Ser/Thr kinase that is asymmetrically distributed. Cell 81, 611–620 (1995).
62. Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998).
63. Kamath, R. S. et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231–237 (2003).
64. Meister, G. & Tuschl, T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature 431, 343–349 (2004).
65. Moffat, J. & Sabatini, D. M. Building mammalian signalling pathways with RNAi screens. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 177–187 (2006).
66. Carette, J. E. et al. Haploid genetic screens in human cells identify host factors used by pathogens. Science 326, 1231–1235 (2009).
67. Carette, J. E. et al. Global gene disruption in human cells to assign genes to phenotypes by deep sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 542–546 (2011).
68. Blomen, V. A. et al. Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells. Science 350, 1092–1096 (2015).
69. Burckstummer, T. et al. A reversible gene trap collection empowers haploid genetics in human cells. Nat. Methods 10, 965–971 (2013).
70. Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D. & McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 333–351 (2016).
71. Chewapreecha, C. et al. Dense genomic sampling identifies highways of pneumococcal recombination. Nat. Genet. 46, 305–309 (2014).
72. Earle, S. G. et al. Identifying lineage effects when controlling for population structure improves power in bacterial association studies. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16041 (2016).
73. Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
74. Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
75. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
76. Marx, V. The DNA of a nation. Nature 524, 503–505 (2015).
77. van Opijnen, T., Bodi, K. L. & Camilli, A. Tn-seq: highthroughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat. Methods 6, 767–772 (2009).
78. Hensel, M. et al. Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science 269, 400–403 (1995).
79. Mazurkiewicz, P., Tang, C. M., Boone, C. & Holden, D. W. Signature-tagged mutagenesis: barcoding mutants for genome-wide screens. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 929–939 (2006).
80. Lee, A. Y. et al. Mapping the cellular response to small molecules using chemogenomic fitness signatures. Science 344, 208–211 (2014).
81. Price, M. N. et al. Deep annotation of protein function across diverse bacteria from mutant phenotypes. Preprint at bioRxiv http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/072470 (2016).
82. Lander, E. S. The heroes of CRISPR. Cell 164, 18–28 (2016).
83. Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278 (2014).
84. Sander, J. D. & Joung, J. K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 347–355 (2014).
85. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
86. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).
87. Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNAguided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451 (2013).
88. Gilbert, L. A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).
89. Horlbeck, M. A. et al. Compact and highly active nextgeneration libraries for CRISPR-mediated gene repression and activation. eLife 5, e19760 (2016).
90. Peters, J. M. et al. A comprehensive, CRISPR-based functional analysis of essential genes in bacteria. Cell 165, 1493–1506 (2016).
91. Evers, B. et al. CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 631–633 (2016).
92. Hart, T. et al. High-resolution CRISPR screens reveal fitness genes and genotype-specific cancer liabilities. Cell 163, 1515–1526 (2015).
93. Wang, T. et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 350, 1096–1101 (2015).
94. Wang, T. et al. Gene essentiality profiling reveals gene networks and synthetic lethal interactions with oncogenic Ras. Cell 168, 890–903.e15 (2017).
95. Georgi, B., Voight, B. F. & Bucan, M. From mouse to human: evolutionary genomics analysis of human orthologs of essential genes. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003484 (2013).
96. Zhan, T. & Boutros, M. Towards a compendium of essential genes — from model organisms to synthetic lethality in cancer cells. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 74–85 (2016).
97. Gao, F., Luo, H., Zhang, C. T. & Zhang, R. Gene essentiality analysis based on DEG 10, an updated database of essential genes. Methods Mol. Biol. 1279, 219–233 (2015).
98. Glass, J. I. et al. Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 425–430 (2006).
99. Moran, N. A. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell 108, 583–586 (2002).
100. Gawronski, J. D., Wong, S. M., Giannoukos, G., Ward, D. V. & Akerley, B. J. Tracking insertion mutants within libraries by deep sequencing and a genome-wide screen for Haemophilus genes required in the lung. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16422–16427 (2009).
101. Mori, H. et al. Identification of essential genes and synthetic lethal gene combinations in Escherichia coli K-12. Methods Mol. Biol. 1279, 45–65 (2015).
102. Dagan, T. et al. Genomes of stigonematalean cyanobacteria (subsection V) and the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis from prokaryotes to plastids. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 31–44 (2013).
103. Koonin, E. V., Mushegian, A. R. & Bork, P. Nonorthologous gene displacement. Trends Genet. 12, 334–336 (1996).
104. Koonin, E. V. Comparative genomics, minimal genesets and the last universal common ancestor. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1, 127–136 (2003).
105. Pesenti, M. E., Weir, J. R. & Musacchio, A. Progress in the structural and functional characterization of kinetochores. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 37, 152–163 (2016).
106. Akiyoshi, B. & Gull, K. Discovery of unconventional kinetochores in kinetoplastids. Cell 156, 1247–1258 (2014).
107. D’Archivio, S. & Wickstead, B. Trypanosome outer kinetochore proteins suggest conservation of chromosome segregation machinery across eukaryotes. J. Cell Biol. 216, 379–391 (2017).
108. Pal, C., Papp, B. & Lercher, M. J. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 337–348 (2006).
109. Boorstein, W. R., Ziegelhoffer, T. & Craig, E. A. Molecular evolution of the HSP70 multigene family. J. Mol. Evol. 38, 1–17 (1994).
110. Jordan, I. K., Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. Genome Res. 12, 962–968 (2002).
111. Luo, H., Gao, F. & Lin, Y. Evolutionary conservation analysis between the essential and nonessential genes in bacterial genomes. Sci. Rep. 5, 13210 (2015).
112. Hurst, L. D. & Smith, N. G. C. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr. Biol. 9, 747–750 (1999).
113. Hirsh, A. E. & Fraser, H. B. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411, 1046–1049 (2001).
114. Lynch, M., Bobay, L. M., Catania, F., Gout, J. F. & Rho, M. The repatterning of eukaryotic genomes by random genetic drift. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 12, 347–366 (2011).
115. Fang, G., Rocha, E. & Danchin, A. How essential are nonessential genes? Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2147–2156 (2005).
116. Gustafson, A. M., Snitkin, E. S., Parker, S. C., DeLisi, C. & Kasif, S. Towards the identification of essential genes using targeted genome sequencing and comparative analysis. BMC Genomics 7, 265 (2006).
117. Bergmiller, T., Ackermann, M. & Silander, O. K. Patterns of evolutionary conservation of essential genes correlate with their compensability. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002803 (2012).
118. Ramani, Arun K. et al. The majority of animal genes are required for wild-type fitness. Cell 148, 792–802 (2012).
119. Davierwala, A. P. et al. The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes. Nat. Genet. 37, 1147–1152 (2005).
120. Costanzo, M. et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327, 425–431 (2010).
121. Hart, G. T., Lee, I. & Marcotte, E. R. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 236 (2007).
122. Michaut, M. et al. Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001092 (2011).
123. Zotenko, E., Mestre, J., O’Leary, D. P. & Przytycka, T. M. Why do hubs in the yeast protein interaction network tend to be essential: reexamining the connection between the network topology and essentiality. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000140 (2008).
124. Wang, H. et al. A complex-based reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interactome. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 8, 1361–1381 (2009).
125. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104–110 (2008).
126. Mahadevan, R. & Palsson, B. O. Properties of metabolic networks: structure versus function. Biophys. J. 88, L07–L09 (2005).
127. Costanzo, M. et al. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353, aaf1420 (2016).
128. Szappanos, B. et al. An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 43, 656–662 (2011).
129. D’Elia, M. A., Pereira, M. P. & Brown, E. D. Are essential genes really essential? Trends Microbiol. 17, 433–438 (2009).
130. Costa, C. S., Pettinari, M. J., Mendez, B. S. & Anton, D. N. Null mutations in the essential gene yrfF (mucM) are not lethal in rcsB, yojN or rcsC strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 222, 25–32 (2003).
131. Hillenmeyer, M. E. et al. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320, 362–365 (2008).
132. Nichols, R. J. et al. Phenotypic landscape of a bacterial cell. Cell 144, 143–156 (2011).
133. Papp, B., Pal, C. & Hurst, L. D. Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast. Nature 429, 661–664 (2004).
134. Qian, W., Ma, D., Xiao, C., Wang, Z. & Zhang, J. The genomic landscape and evolutionary resolution of antagonistic pleiotropy in yeast. Cell Rep. 2, 1399–1410 (2012).
135. Nijman, S. M. B. Synthetic lethality: general principles, utility and detection using genetic screens in human cells. FEBS Lett. 585, 1–6 (2011).
136. Commichau, F. M., Pietack, N. & Stulke, J. Essential genes in Bacillus subtilis: a re-evaluation after ten years. Mol. Biosyst. 9, 1068–1075 (2013).
137. Chen, P., Wang, D., Chen, H., Zhou, Z. & He, X. The nonessentiality of essential genes in yeast provides therapeutic insights into a human disease. Genome Res. 26, 1355–1362 (2016).
138. Chen, R. et al. Analysis of 589,306 genomes identifies individuals resilient to severe Mendelian childhood diseases. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 531–538 (2016).
139. Narasimhan, V. M. et al. Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents. Science 352, 474–477 (2016).
140. Dowell, R. D. et al. Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328, 469 (2010).
141. Storchova, Z. et al. Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast. Nature 443, 541–547 (2006).
142. Harrison, R., Papp, B., Pal, C., Oliver, S. G. & Delneri, D. Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2307–2312 (2007).
143. Bandyopadhyay, S. et al. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330, 1385–1389 (2010).
144. Martin, H. et al. Differential genetic interactions of yeast stress response MAPK pathways. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 800 (2015).
145. Ish-Am, O., Kristensen, D. M. & Ruppin, E. Evolutionary conservation of bacterial essential metabolic genes across all bacterial culture media. PLoS ONE 10, e0123785 (2015).
146. Hart, T., Brown, K. R., Sircoulomb, F., Rottapel, R. & Moffat, J. Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 733 (2014).
147. Lu, Y., Deng, J., Rhodes, J. C., Lu, H. & Lu, L. J. Predicting essential genes for identifying potential drug targets in Aspergillus fumigatus. Comput. Biol. Chem. 50, 29–40 (2014).
148. Dezso, Z., Oltvai, Z. N. & Barabasi, A. L. Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res. 13, 2450–2454 (2003).
149. Ryan, C. J., Krogan, N. J., Cunningham, P. & Cagney, G. All or nothing: protein complexes flip essentiality between distantly related eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 1049–1059 (2013).
150. Kachroo, A. H. et al. Evolution. Systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity. Science 348, 921–925 (2015).
151. van Leeuwen, J. et al. Exploring genetic suppression interactions on a global scale. Science 354, aag0839 (2016).
152. Szamecz, B. et al. The genomic landscape of compensatory evolution. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001935 (2014).
153. Rancati, G. et al. Aneuploidy underlies rapid adaptive evolution of yeast cells deprived of a conserved cytokinesis motor. Cell 135, 879–893 (2008).
154. Levin, D. E. Cell wall integrity signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69, 262–291 (2005).
155. Barr, F. A. & Gruneberg, U. Cytokinesis: placing and making the final cut. Cell 131, 847–860 (2007).
156. Liu, G. et al. Gene essentiality is a quantitative property linked to cellular evolvability. Cell 163, 1388–1399 (2015).
157. Patrick, W. M., Quandt, E. M., Swartzlander, D. B. & Matsumura, I. Multicopy suppression underpins metabolic evolvability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2716–2722 (2007).
158. Vernon, M., Lobachev, K. & Petes, T. D. High rates of “unselected” aneuploidy and chromosome rearrangements in tel1 mec1 haploid yeast strains. Genetics 179, 237–247 (2008).
159. Laan, L., Koschwanez, J. H. & Murray, A. W. Evolutionary adaptation after crippling cell polarization follows reproducible trajectories. eLife 4, e09638 (2015).
160. Filteau, M. et al. Evolutionary rescue by compensatory mutations is constrained by genomic and environmental backgrounds. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 832 (2015).
161. Becker, J. & Wittmann, C. Systems and synthetic metabolic engineering for amino acid production - the heartbeat of industrial strain development. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23, 718–726 (2012).
162. Gibson, D. G. et al. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329, 52–56 (2010).
163. Dymond, J. S. et al. Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature 477, 471–476 (2011).
164. Annaluru, N. et al. Total synthesis of a functional designer eukaryotic chromosome. Science 344, 55–58 (2014).
165. Annaluru, N., Ramalingam, S. & Chandrasegaran, S. Rewriting the blueprint of life by synthetic genomics and genome engineering. Genome Biol. 16, 125 (2015).
166. Hutchison, C. A. et al. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science 351, aad6253 (2016).
167. Koonin, E. V. How many genes can make a cell: the minimal-gene-set concept. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 1, 99–116 (2000).
168. Posfai, G. et al. Emergent properties of reducedgenome Escherichia coli. Science 312, 1044–1046 (2006).
169. Giga-Hama, Y., Tohda, H., Takegawa, K. & Kumagai, H. Schizosaccharomyces pombe minimum genome factory. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 46, 147–155 (2007).
170. Reuss, D. R. et al. Large-scale reduction of the Bacillus subtilis genome: consequences for the transcriptional network, resource allocation, and metabolism. Genome Res. 27, 289–299 (2017).
171. Pal, C. et al. Chance and necessity in the evolution of minimal metabolic networks. Nature 440, 667–670 (2006).
172. Wang, K. et al. Defining synonymous codon compression schemes by genome recoding. Nature 539, 59–64 (2016).
173. Johns, N. I., Blazejewski, T., Gomes, A. L. & Wang, H. H. Principles for designing synthetic microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 146–153 (2016).
174. Zelezniak, A. et al. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6449–6454 (2015).
175. Mee, M. T., Collins, J. J., Church, G. M. & Wang, H. H. Syntrophic exchange in synthetic microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2149–E2156 (2014).
176. Roemer, T. et al. Large-scale essential gene identification in Candida albicans and applications to antifungal drug discovery. Mol. Microbiol. 50, 167–181 (2003).
177. Paul, M. L., Kaur, A., Geete, A. & Sobhia, M. E. Essential gene identification and drug target prioritization in Leishmania species. Mol. Biosyst. 10, 1184–1195 (2014).
178. Dickey, S. W., Cheung, G. Y. C. & Otto, M. Different drugs for bad bugs: antivirulence strategies in the age of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 457–471 (2017).
179. Becattini, S., Taur, Y. & Pamer, E. G. Antibiotic-induced changes in the intestinal microbiota and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 22, 458–478 (2016).
180. Farmer, H. et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434, 917–921 (2005).
181. Bixel, K. & Hays, J. L. Olaparib in the management of ovarian cancer. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 8, 127–135 (2015).
182. O’Neil, N. J., Bailey, M. L. & Hieter, P. Synthetic lethality and cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 613–623 (2017).
183. Iorio, F. et al. A landscape of pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer. Cell 166, 740–754 (2016).
184. Brown, E. D. & Wright, G. D. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 529, 336–343 (2016).
185. Lambert, G. et al. An analogy between the evolution of drug resistance in bacterial communities and malignant tissues. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 375–382 (2011).
186. Mnaimneh, S. et al. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell 118, 31–44 (2004).
187. Wildenhain, J. et al. Prediction of synergism from chemical-genetic interactions by machine learning. Cell Syst. 1, 383–395 (2015).
188. Chandrasekaran, S. et al. Chemogenomics and orthology-based design of antibiotic combination therapies. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 872 (2016).
189. McClintock, B. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 36, 344–355 (1950).
190. Sanger, F. & Coulson, A. R. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 94, 441–448 (1975).
191. Tanaka, T. & Letsinger, R. L. Syringe method for stepwise chemical synthesis of oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 3249–3260 (1982).
192. Elbashir, S. M. et al. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411, 494–498 (2001).
193. Paddison, P. J. et al. A resource for large-scale RNAinterference-based screens in mammals. Nature 428, 427–431 (2004).
194. Berns, K. et al. A large-scale RNAi screen in human cells identifies new components of the p53 pathway. Nature 428, 431–437 (2004).
195. Pelkmans, L. et al. Genome-wide analysis of human kinases in clathrin- and caveolae/raft-mediated endocytosis. Nature 436, 78–86 (2005).
196. Kittler, R. et al. An endoribonuclease-prepared siRNA screen in human cells identifies genes essential for cell division. Nature 432, 1036–1040 (2004).
197. Moffat, J. et al. A lentiviral RNAi library for human and mouse genes applied to an arrayed viral highcontent screen. Cell 124, 1283–1298 (2006).
198. Barrangou, R. & Doudna, J. A. Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 933–941 (2016).
199. Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
200. Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).
201. Farber, S. & Diamond, L. K. Temporary remissions in acute leukemia in children produced by folic acid antagonist, 4-aminopteroyl-glutamic acid. N. Engl. J. Med. 238, 787–793 (1948).
202. Ji, Y. et al. Identification of critical staphylococcal genes using conditional phenotypes generated by antisense RNA. Science 293, 2266–2269 (2001).
203. Thanassi, J. A., Hartman-Neumann, S. L., Dougherty, T. J., Dougherty, B. A. & Pucci, M. J. Identification of 113 conserved essential genes using a high-throughput gene disruption system in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3152–3162 (2002).
204. Knuth, K., Niesalla, H., Hueck, C. J. & Fuchs, T. M. Large-scale identification of essential Salmonella genes by trapping lethal insertions. Mol. Microbiol. 51, 1729–1744 (2004).
205. Amsterdam, A. et al. Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12792–12797 (2004).
206. Dietzl, G. et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448, 151–156 (2007).
207. Raman, K., Damaraju, N. & Joshi, G. K. The organisational structure of protein networks: revisiting the centrality-lethality hypothesis. Syst. Synth. 8, 73–81 (2014).
208. Sonnenblick, A., de Azambuja, E., Azim, H. A. Jr & Piccart, M. An update on PARP inhibitors — moving to the adjuvant setting. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 12, 27–41 (2015).