All or nothing: Protein complexes flip essentiality between distantly related eukaryotes

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1049-1059

  Ryan, Colm J ^a   Krogan, Nevan J ^b,c,d   Cunningham, Pádraig ^a   Cagney, Gerard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d GLADSTONE INSTITUTES   (United States)

Author keywords

Essentiality; Genetic interactions; Modularity; Protein complexes; Redundancy; Yeast

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ESSENTIAL GENE; ESSENTIALITY; FUNGAL GENE; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC INTERACTIONS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MODULARITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REDUNDANCY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; YEAST;

ESSENTIALITY; GENETIC INTERACTIONS; MODULARITY; PROTEIN COMPLEXES; REDUNDANCY; YEAST;

GENE ONTOLOGY; GENES, ESSENTIAL; GENES, FUNGAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

EID: 84891620973     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt074     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alberts B. 1998. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 92:291-294.
2. Ashburner M, et al. 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25-29.
3. Bandyopadhyay S, et al. 2010. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330:1385-1389.
4. Bandyopadhyay S, Kelley R, Krogan NJ, Ideker T. 2008. Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLoS Comput Biol. 4:e1000065.
5. Baryshnikova A, et al. 2010. Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat Methods. 7:1017-1024.
6. Becker JM, et al. 2010. Pathway analysis of Candida albicans survival and virulence determinants in a murine infection model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:22044-22049.
7. Beltrao P, et al. 2009. Evolution of phosphoregulation: comparison of phosphorylation patterns across yeast species. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000134.
8. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2005. The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res. 15:1456-1461.
9. Chen W-HH, Minguez P, Lercher MJ, Bork P. 2012. OGEE: an online gene essentiality database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D901-D906.
10. Cherry JM, et al. 2012. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D700-D705.
11. Collins SR, Roguev A, Krogan NJ. 2010. Quantitative genetic interaction mapping using the E-MAP approach. Methods Enzymol. 470:205-231.
12. Dean EJ, Davis JC, Davis RW, Petrov DA. 2008. Pervasive and persistent redundancy among duplicated genes in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000113.
13. Dezso Z, Oltvai ZN, Barabási A-L. 2003. Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res. 13:2450-2454.
14. Dreze M, et al. 2009. "Edgetic" perturbation of a C.elegans BCL2 ortholog. Nat Methods. 6:843-849.
15. Ear PH, Michnick SW. 2009. A general life-death selection strategy for dissecting protein functions. Nat Methods. 6:813-816.
16. Fraser HB, Plotkin JB. 2007. Using protein complexes to predict phenotypic effects of gene mutation. Genome Biol. 8:R252.
17. Frost A, et al. 2012. Functional repurposing revealed by comparing S. pombe and S. cerevisiae genetic interactions. Cell 149:1339-1352.
18. Gavin A-C, et al. 2006. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440:631-636.
19. Gebert N, et al. 2011. Dual function of Sdh3 in the respiratory chain and TIM22 protein translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mol Cell. 44:811-818.
20. Giaever G, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
21. Gu Z, Cavalcanti A, Chen F-C, Bouman P, Li W-H. 2002. Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of Drosophila, nematode, and yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 19:256-262.
22. Guan Y, Dunham MJ, Troyanskaya OG. 2007. Functional Analysis of Gene Duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 175:933-943.
23. Guénolé A, et al. 2013. Dissection of DNA damage responses using multiconditional genetic interaction maps. Mol Cell. 49:346-358.
24. Hart TT, Lee I, Marcotte ER. 2007. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinformatics 8:236.
25. Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW. 1999. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402:C47-C52.
26. He X, Zhang J. 2006. Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet. 2:e88.
27. Hillenmeyer ME, et al. 2008. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320:362-365.
28. Hillenmeyer ME, et al. 2010. Systematic analysis of genome-wide fitness data in yeast reveals novel gene function and drug action. Genome Biol. 11:R30.
29. Ihmels J, Collins S, Schuldiner M, Krogan N, Weissman J. 2007. Backup without redundancy: genetic interactions reveal the cost of duplicate gene loss. Mol Syst Biol. 3:86.
30. Jeffery CJ. 2003. Moonlighting proteins: old proteins learning new tricks. Trends Genet. 19:415-417.
31. Jensen L J J, Jensen T S S, De Lichtenberg U, Brunak S, Bork P. 2006. Co-evolution of transcriptional and post-translational cell-cycle regulation. Nature 443:594-597.
32. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41-42.
33. Jiang H, et al. 2011. Identification and characterization of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase and transcription factor in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:5119-5130.
34. Kapitzky L, et al. 2010. Cross-species chemogenomic profiling reveals evolutionarily conserved drug mode of action. Mol Syst Biol. 6:451.
35. Kim D-U, et al. 2010. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol. 28:617-623.
36. Kim PM, Lu LJ, Xia Y, Gerstein MB. 2006. Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 314:1938-1941.
37. Koch EN, et al. 2012. Conserved rules govern genetic interaction degree across species. Genome Biol. 13:R57.
38. Krogan NJ, et al. 2006. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440:637-643.
39. Lage K, et al. 2007. A human phenome-interactome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders. Nat Biotechnol. 25:309-316.
40. Leducq J-B, et al. 2012. Evidence for the robustness of protein complexes to inter-species hybridization. PLoS Genet. 8:e1003161.
41. Lee I, et al. 2008. A single gene network accurately predicts phenotypic effects of gene perturbation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet. 40:181-188.
42. Li J, Yuan Z, Zhang Z. 2010. The cellular robustness by genetic redundancy in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001187.
43. Michaut M, et al. 2011. Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape. PLoS Comput Biol. 7:e1001092.
44. Musso G, Zhang Z, Emili A. 2007. Retention of protein complex membership by ancient duplicated gene products in budding yeast. Trends Genet. 23:266-269.
45. Newman M. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103:8577-8582.
46. Noble SM, French S, Kohn LA, Chen V, Johnson AD. 2010. Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat Genet. 42:590-598.
47. Nowak MA, Boerlijst MC, Cooke J, Smith JM. 1997. Evolution of genetic redundancy. 388:167-171.
48. Oti M, Brunner HG. 2007. The modular nature of genetic diseases. Clin Genet. 71:1-11.
49. Oyedotun KS, Lemire BD. 2004. The quaternary structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae succinate dehydrogenase. Homology modeling, cofactor docking, and molecular dynamics simulation studies. J Biol Chem. 279:9424-9431.
50. Pereira-Leal JB, Levy E, Kamp C, Teichmann S. 2007. Evolution of protein complexes by duplication of homomeric interactions. Genome Biol. 8:R51.
51. Pereira-Leal JB, Levy ED, Teichmann SA. 2006. The origins and evolution of functional modules: lessons from protein complexes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 361:507-517.
52. Pu S, Wong J, Turner B, Cho E, Wodak SJ. 2009. Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:825-831.
53. Punta M, et al. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D290-D301.
54. Rhind N, et al. 2011. Comparative functional genomics of the fission yeasts. Science 332:930-936.
55. Roguev A, et al. 2008. Conservation and rewiring of functional modules revealed by an epistasis map in fission yeast. Science 322:405-410.
56. Rost B. 1999. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12:85-94.
57. Ruepp A, et al. 2010. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes-2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D497-D501.
58. Ryan CJ, et al. 2012. Hierarchical modularity and the evolution of genetic interactomes across species. Mol Cell. 46:691-704.
59. Segrè D, De Luna A, Church GM, Kishony R. 2005. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet. 37:77-83.
60. Semple JI, Vavouri T, Lehner B. 2008. A simple principle concerning the robustness of protein complex activity to changes in gene expression. BMC Syst Biol. 2:1.
61. Shevchenko A, et al. 2008. Chromatin central: towards the comparative proteome by accurate mapping of the yeast proteomic environment. Genome Biol. 9:R167.
62. Sipiczki M. 2000. Where does fission yeast sit on the tree of life? Genome Biol. 1: reviews1011-reviews1011.4.
63. Stark C, et al. 2011. The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D698-D704.
64. St Onge RP, et al. 2007. Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet. 39:199-206.
65. Szklarczyk R, Huynen MA, Snel B. 2008. Complex fate of paralogs. BMC Evol Biol. 8:337.
66. Tan K, Shlomi T, Feizi H, Ideker T, Sharan R. 2007. Transcriptional regulation of protein complexes within and across species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:1283-1288.
67. Van Dam T J P, Snel B. 2008. Protein complex evolution does not involve extensive network rewiring. PLoS Comput Biol. 4:e1000132.
68. Vander Sluis B, et al. 2010. Genetic interactions reveal the evolutionary trajectories of duplicate genes. Mol Syst Biol. 6:429.
69. Van Wageningen S, et al. 2010. Functional overlap and regulatory links shape genetic interactions between signaling pathways. Cell 143:991-1004.
70. Wang H, et al. 2009. A complex-based reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interactome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 8:1361-1381.
71. Wilmes GM, et al. 2008. A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. Mol Cell. 32:735-746.
72. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708-713.
73. Wood V. 2006. Schizosaccharomyces pombe comparative genomics; from sequence to systems. In: Sunnerhagen P, Piskur J, editors. Comparative genomics: using fungi as models, Vol. 15. Berlin (Germany): Springer. p. 233-285.
74. Wood V, et al. 2012. PomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D695-D699.
75. Yu H, et al. 2008. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322:104-110.
76. Zhong Q, et al. 2009. Edgetic perturbation models of human inherited disorders. Mol Syst Biol. 5:321.
77. Zotenko E, Mestre J, O'Leary DP, Przytycka TM. 2008. Why do hubs in the yeast protein interaction network tend to be essential: reexamining the connection between the network topology and essentiality. PLoS Comput Biol. 4:e1000140.