A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function

Science

Volumn 353, Issue 6306, 2016, Pages

  Costanzo, Michael ^a   VanderSluis, Benjamin ^b,c   Koch, Elizabeth N ^b   Baryshnikova, Anastasia ^d   Pons, Carles ^b,q   Tan, Guihong ^a   Wang, Wen ^b   Usaj, Matej ^a   Hanchard, Julia ^a   Lee, Susan D ^e   Pelechano, Vicent ^f,r   Styles, Erin B ^a   Billmann, Maximilian ^g   Van Leeuwen, Jolanda ^a   Van Dyk, Nydia ^a   Lin, Zhen Yuan ^h   Kuzmin, Elena ^a   Nelson, Justin ^b   Piotrowski, Jeff S ^a,i,s   Srikumar, Tharan ^d,j   Bahr, Sondra ^a   Chen, Yiqun ^a   Deshpande, Raamesh ^b   Kurat, Christoph F ^a,t   Li, Sheena C ^a,i   Li, Zhijian ^a   Usaj, Mojca Mattiazzi ^a   Okada, Hiroki ^k   Pascoe, Natasha ^a   Luis, Bryan Joseph San ^a   Sharifpoor, Sara ^a   Shuteriqi, Emira ^a   Simpkins, Scott W ^b   Snider, Jamie ^a   Suresh, Harsha Garadi ^a   Tan, Yizhao ^a   Zhu, Hongwei ^a   Malod Dognin, Noel ^l   Janjic, Vuk ^m   Przulj, Natasa ^l,n   Troyanskaya, Olga G ^c,d   Stagljar, Igor ^a   Xia, Tian ^b,o   Ohya, Yoshikazu ^k   Gingras, Anne Claude ^a,h   Raught, Brian ^j   Boutros, Michael ^g   Steinmetz, Lars M ^f,p   Moore, Claire L ^e   Rosebrock, Adam P ^a   Caudy, Amy A ^a   Myers, Chad L ^b   Andrews, Brenda ^a   Boone, Charles ^a,i   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c FLATIRON INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^h MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science   (Japan)

^j PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^l UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^m IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^o HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^p STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^q INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^r KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^s Yumanity Therapeutics   (United States)

^t THE FRANCIS CRICK INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BACTERIUM; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; GENE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; MUTATION; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL FUNCTION; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN HOMEOSTASIS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; EPISTASIS; FUNGAL GENE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, ESSENTIAL; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC PLEIOTROPY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84989216655     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf1420     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. M. Costanzo et al., The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327, 425-431 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1180823; pmid: 20093466
2. J. L. Hartman 4th, B. Garvik, L. Hartwell, Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291, 1001-1004 (2001). doi: 10.1126/science.291.5506.1001; pmid: 11232561
3. O. Zuk, E. Hechter, S. R. Sunyaev, E. S. Lander, The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 1193-1198 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119675109; pmid: 22223662
4. J. S. Bloom et al., Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast. Nat. Commun. 6, 8712 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ncomms9712; pmid: 26537231
5. A. Baryshnikova et al., Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat. Methods 7, 1017-1024 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1534; pmid: 21076421
6. T. Roemer, C. Boone, Systems-level antimicrobial drug and drug synergy discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 222-231 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1205; pmid: 23508188
7. H. E. Bryant et al., Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 434, 913-917 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nature03443; pmid: 15829966
8. E. A. Winzeler et al., Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901-906 (1999). doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.901; pmid: 10436161
9. G. Giaever et al., Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387-391 (2002). doi: 10.1038/nature00935; pmid: 12140549
10. M. Kofoed et al., An updated collection of sequence barcoded temperature-sensitive alleles of yeast essential genes. Genes Genomes Genetics 5, 1879-1887 (2015). doi: 10.1534/g3.115.019174; pmid: 26175450
11. Z. Li et al., Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 361-367 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nbt.1832; pmid: 21441928
12. M. Schuldiner et al., Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123, 507-519 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.031; pmid: 16269340
13. M. Ashburner et al., Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000). doi: 10.1038/75556; pmid: 10802651
14. A. Baryshnikova, Systematic functional annotation and visualization of biological networks. Cell Syst. 2, 412-421 (2016).
15. J. Dutkowski et al., A gene ontology inferred from molecular networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 38-45 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nbt.2463; pmid: 23242164
16. J. L. Koh et al., CYCLoPs: A comprehensive database constructed from automated analysis of protein abundance and subcellular localization patterns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Genomes Genetics 5, 1223-1232 (2015). doi: 10.1534/g3.115.017830; pmid: 26048563
17. T. A. Sangster, S. Lindquist, C. Queitsch, Under cover: Causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance. BioEssays 26, 348-362 (2004). doi: 10.1002/bies.20020; pmid: 15057933
18. S. Chan, E. A. Choi, Y. Shi, Pre-mRNA 3'-end processing complex assembly and function. RNA 2, 321-335 (2011). doi: 10.1002/wrna.54; pmid: 21957020
19. J. M. Gordon et al., Reconstitution of CF IA from overexpressed subunits reveals stoichiometry and provides insights into molecular topology. Biochemistry 50, 10203-10214 (2011). doi: 10.1021/bi200964p; pmid: 22026644
20. F. Abe, H. Minegishi, Global screening of genes essential for growth in high-pressure and cold environments: Searching for basic adaptive strategies using a yeast deletion library. Genetics 178, 851-872 (2008). doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.083063; pmid: 18245339
21. S. G. Addinall et al., A genomewide suppressor and enhancer analysis of cdc13-1 reveals varied cellular processes influencing telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180, 2251-2266 (2008). doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.092577; pmid: 18845848
22. A. Greenall et al., A genome wide analysis of the response to uncapped telomeres in budding yeast reveals a novel role for the NAD+ biosynthetic gene BNA2 in chromosome end protection. Genome Biol. 9, R146 (2008). doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-r146; pmid: 18828915
23. S. Mnaimneh et al., Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell 118, 31-44 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.013; pmid: 15242642
24. E. N. Koch et al., Conserved rules govern genetic interaction degree across species. Genome Biol. 13, R57 (2012). doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r57; pmid: 22747640
25. S. Lahiri et al., A conserved endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC) facilitates phospholipid transfer from the ER to mitochondria. PLOS Biol. 12, e1001969 (2014). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001969; pmid: 25313861
26. R. Sánchez, A. Sali, Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 13597-13602 (1998). doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13597; pmid: 9811845
27. D. Segrè, A. Deluna, G. M. Church, R. Kishony, Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37, 77-83 (2005). pmid: 15592468
28. S. Bandyopadhyay, R. Kelley, N. J. Krogan, T. Ideker, Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000065 (2008). doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000065; pmid: 18421374
29. D. Hoepfner et al., High-resolution chemical dissection of a model eukaryote reveals targets, pathways and gene functions. Microbiol. Res. 169, 107-120 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.11.004; pmid: 24360837
30. S. P. Bell, The origin recognition complex: From simple origins to complex functions. Genes Dev. 16, 659-672 (2002). doi: 10.1101/gad.969602; pmid: 11914271
31. M. Lei, B. K. Tye, Initiating DNA synthesis: From recruiting to activating the MCM complex. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1447-1454 (2001). pmid: 11282021
32. S. A. MacNeill, Structure and function of the GINS complex, a key component of the eukaryotic replisome. Biochem. J. 425, 489-500 (2010). doi: 10.1042/BJ20091531; pmid: 20070258
33. J. M. Peters, The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: A machine designed to destroy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 644-656 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nrm1988; pmid: 16896351
34. F. Khosrow-Khavar et al., The yeast ubr1 ubiquitin ligase participates in a prominent pathway that targets cytosolic thermosensitive mutants for degradation. Genes Genomes Genetics 2, 619-628 (2012). doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001933; pmid: 22670231
35. R. Li, A. W. Murray, Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519-531 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5; pmid: 1651172
36. S. Bandyopadhyay et al., Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330, 1385-1389 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1195618; pmid: 21127252
37. C. A. Hutchison 3rd et al., Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science 351, aad6253 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aad6253; pmid: 27013737
38. R. D. Dowell et al., Genotype to phenotype: A complex problem. Science 328, 469 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1189015; pmid: 20413493
39. B. VanderSluis et al., Genetic interactions reveal the evolutionary trajectories of duplicate genes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 429 (2010). doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.82; pmid: 21081923
40. D. Altshuler, M. J. Daly, E. S. Lander, Genetic mapping in human disease. Science 322, 881-888 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1156409; pmid: 18988837
41. B. Lehner, C. Crombie, J. Tischler, A. Fortunato, A. G. Fraser, Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways. Nat. Genet. 38, 896-903 (2006). doi: 10.1038/ng1844; pmid: 16845399
42. A. B. Byrne et al., A global analysis of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. 6, 8 (2007). doi: 10.1186/jbiol58; pmid: 17897480
43. B. Fischer et al., A map of directional genetic interactions in a metazoan cell. eLife 4, e05464 (2015). doi: 10.7554/eLife.05464; pmid: 25748138
44. R. Blekhman et al., Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 16, 191 (2015). doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0759-1; pmid: 26374288
45. C. M. Buchovecky et al., A suppressor screen in Mecp2 mutant mice implicates cholesterol metabolism in Rett syndrome. Nat. Genet. 45, 1013-1020 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ng.2714; pmid: 23892605
46. K. M. Keeling, X. Xue, G. Gunn, D. M. Bedwell, Therapeutics based on stop codon readthrough. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 15, 371-394 (2014). doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153527; pmid: 24773318
47. P. Tsvetkov et al., Compromising the 19S proteasome complex protects cells from reduced flux through the proteasome. eLife 4, e08467 (2015). doi: 10.7554/eLife.08467; pmid: 26327695
48. S. J. Dixon et al., Significant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 16653-16658 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806261105; pmid: 18931302
49. A. Roguev et al., Conservation and rewiring of functional modules revealed by an epistasis map in fission yeast. Science 322, 405-410 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1162609; pmid: 18818364
50. R. Deshpande et al., A comparative genomic approach for identifying synthetic lethal interactions in human cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 6128-6136 (2013). doi: 10.1158/0008-5472. CAN-12-3956; pmid: 23980094
51. K. J. McManus, I. J. Barrett, Y. Nouhi, P. Hieter, Specific synthetic lethal killing of RAD54B-deficient human colorectal cancer cells by FEN1 silencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3276-3281 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813414106; pmid: 19218431
52. D. M. van Pel et al., An evolutionarily conserved synthetic lethal interaction network identifies FEN1 as a broad-spectrum target for anticancer therapeutic development. PLOS Genet. 9, e1003254 (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003254; pmid: 23382697
53. L. H. Hartwell, P. Szankasi, C. J. Roberts, A. W. Murray, S. H. Friend, Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. Science 278, 1064-1068 (1997). doi: 10.1126/science.278.5340.1064; pmid: 9353181
54. T. Hart et al., High-resolution CRISPR screens reveal fitness genes and genotype-specific cancer liabilities. Cell 163, 1515-1526 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.015; pmid: 26627737
55. T. Wang et al., Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 350, 1096-1101 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aac7041; pmid: 26472758
56. V. A. Blomen et al., Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells. Science 350, 1092-1096 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aac7557; pmid: 26472760