Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 20, 2015, Pages 6449-6454

  Zelezniak, Aleksej ^a   Andrejev, Sergej ^a   Ponomarova, Olga ^a   Mende, Daniel R ^a   Bork, Peer ^a   Patil, Kiran Raosaheb ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Community metabolism; Cooperation; Metabolic modeling; Naturalization theory; Syntrophy

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARBOHYDRATE;

ARTICLE; COMPETITION; GENETIC MODEL; GENOME ANALYSIS; HABITAT; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES COEXISTENCE; SPECIES COMPOSITION; SURVIVAL; SYMBIOSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84929440325     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421834112     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baker BJ, Banfield JF (2003) Microbial communities in acid mine drainage. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44(2):139-152.
2. Andersen R, Chapman SJ, Artz RRE (2013) Microbial communities in natural and disturbed peatlands: A review. Soil Biol Biochem 57:979-994.
3. Fuhrman JA (2009) Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459(7244):193-199.
4. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH (2012) The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(10):577-589.
5. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F (2012) Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489(7415):242-249.
6. Inskeep WP, Jay ZJ, Tringe SG, Herrgård MJ, Rusch DB; YNP Metagenome Project Steering Committee and Working Group Members (2013) The YNP Metagenome Project: Environmental parameters responsible for microbial distribution in the Yellowstone geothermal ecosystem. Front Microbiol 4:67.
7. Qin J, et al.; MetaHIT Consortium (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464(7285):59-65.
8. Levy R, Borenstein E (2013) Metabolic modeling of species interaction in the human microbiome elucidates community-level assembly rules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(31):12804-12809.
9. Foster KR, Bell T (2012) Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Curr Biol 22(19):1845-1850.
10. Hibbing ME, Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Peterson SB (2010) Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat Rev Microbiol 8(1):15-25.
11. HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM (2012) Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43(1):227-248.
12. Morris BE, Henneberger R, Huber H, Moissl-Eichinger C (2013) Microbial syntrophy: Interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(3):384-406.
13. Grosskopf T, Soyer OS (2014) Synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 18:72-77.
14. Jousset A, Eisenhauer N, Materne E, Scheu S (2013) Evolutionary history predicts the stability of cooperation in microbial communities. Nat Commun 4:2573.
15. Kuramitsu HK, He X, Lux R, Anderson MH, Shi W (2007) Interspecies interactions within oral microbial communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71(4):653-670.
16. Kato S, Haruta S, Cui ZJ, Ishii M, Igarashi Y (2008) Network relationships of bacteria in a stable mixed culture. Microb Ecol 56(3):403-411.
17. Paczia N, et al. (2012) Extensive exometabolome analysis reveals extended overflow metabolism in various microorganisms. Microb Cell Fact 11:122.
18. Barve A, Wagner A (2013) A latent capacity for evolutionary innovation through exaptation in metabolic systems. Nature 500(7461):203-206.
19. Stolyar S, et al. (2007) Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community. Mol Syst Biol 3:92.
20. Klitgord N, Segrè D (2010) Environments that induce synthetic microbial ecosystems. PLOS Comput Biol 6(11):e1001002.
21. Zomorrodi AR, Maranas CD (2012) OptCom: A multi-level optimization framework for the metabolic modeling and analysis of microbial communities. PLOS Comput Biol 8(2):e1002363.
22. Zhuang K, et al. (2011) Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments. ISME J 5(2):305-316.
23. Chaffron S, Rehrauer H, Pernthaler J, von Mering C (2010) A global network of coexisting microbes from environmental and whole-genome sequence data. Genome Res 20(7):947-959.
24. Faust K, et al. (2012) Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLOS Comput Biol 8(7):e1002606.
25. Barberán A, Bates ST, Casamayor EO, Fierer N (2012) Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J 6(2):343-351.
26. Henry CS, et al. (2010) High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 28(9):977-982.
27. Miller LD, et al. (2010) Establishment and metabolic analysis of a model microbial community for understanding trophic and electron accepting interactions of subsurface anaerobic environments. BMC Microbiol 10:149.
28. Hom EF, Murray AW (2014) Plant-fungal ecology. Niche engineering demonstrates a latent capacity for fungal-algal mutualism. Science 345(6192):94-98.
29. Stadie J, Gulitz A, Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF (2013) Metabolic activity and symbiotic interactions of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from water kefir. Food Microbiol 35(2):92-98.
30. Darwin C (1871) On the Origin of Species (Appleton, New York).
31. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):27-30.
32. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57(1):289-300.
33. Krzywinski M, et al. (2009) Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19(9):1639-1645.
34. Ciccarelli FD, et al. (2006) Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311(5765):1283-1287.
35. Minguez P, et al. (2012) Deciphering a global network of functionally associated post-translational modifications. Mol Syst Biol 8:599.
36. Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Zeller G, Bork P (2013) Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat Methods 10(9):881-884.
37. Muller J, Creevey CJ, Thompson JD, Arendt D, Bork P (2010) AQUA: Automated quality improvement for multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 26(2):263-265.
38. Guindon S, et al. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59(3):307-321.
39. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO (2010) What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 28(3):245-248.