Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Michaut, Magali ^a,b   Baryshnikova, Anastasia ^a,b   Costanzo, Michael ^a,b   Myers, Chad L ^c   Andrews, Brenda J ^a,b   Boone, Charles ^a,b   Bader, Gary D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE ONTOLOGY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; PROTEINS; YEAST;

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; FUNCTIONAL MODULES; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC INTERACTION; GLOBAL SCALE; INTERACTION PATTERN; MONOCHROMATICS; NEGATIVE INTERACTION; POSITIVE INTERACTION; PROTEIN COMPLEXES;

GENES;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; FUNGAL GENE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, FUNGAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 79952474742     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001092     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, et al. (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
2. Hillenmeyer ME, Fung E, Wildenhain J, Pierce SE, Hoon S, et al. (2008) The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320: 362-365.
3. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
4. Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Thompson NJ, Denic V, Bhamidipati A, et al. (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123: 507-519.
5. Pan X, Yuan DS, Ooi S-L, Wang X, Sookhai-Mahadeo S, et al. (2007) dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 41: 206-221.
6. Tong AHY, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
7. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-431.
8. Breslow DK, Cameron DM, Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Stewart-Ornstein J, et al. (2008) A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome. Nat Methods 5: 711-718.
9. Fiedler D, Braberg H, Mehta M, Chechik G, Cagney G, et al. (2009) Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network. Cell 136: 952-963.
10. Wong SL, Zhang LV, Roth FP, (2005) Discovering functional relationships: biochemistry versus genetics. Trends Genet 21: 424-427.
11. Mani R, St Onge RP, Hartman JL, Giaever G, Roth FP, (2008) Defining genetic interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 3461-3466.
12. Tucker CL, Fields S, (2003) Lethal combinations. Nat Genet 35: 204-205.
13. Boone C, Bussey H, Andrews BJ, (2007) Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat Rev Genet 8: 437-449.
14. Le Meur N, Gentleman R, (2008) Modeling synthetic lethality. Genome Biol 9: R135.
15. Brady A, Maxwell K, Daniels N, Cowen LJ, (2009) Fault tolerance in protein interaction networks: stable bipartite subgraphs and redundant pathways. PLoS One 4: e5364.
16. Hartman JLt, Garvik B, Hartwell L, (2001) Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291: 1001-1004.
17. Kelley R, Ideker T, (2005) Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat Biotechnol 23: 561-566.
18. Ulitsky I, Shamir R, (2007) Pathway redundancy and protein essentiality revealed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction networks. Mol Syst Biol 3: 104.
19. Ulitsky I, Shlomi T, Kupiec M, Shamir R, (2008) From E-MAPs to module maps: dissecting quantitative genetic interactions using physical interactions. Mol Syst Biol 4: 209.
20. Bandyopadhyay S, Kelley R, Krogan NJ, Ideker T, (2008) Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000065.
21. Breker M, Schuldiner M, (2009) Explorations in topology-delving underneath the surface of genetic interaction maps. Mol Biosyst 5: 1473-1481.
22. Segre D, Deluna A, Church GM, Kishony R, (2005) Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet 37: 77-83.
23. Ye P, Peyser BD, Pan X, Boeke JD, Spencer FA, et al. (2005) Gene function prediction from congruent synthetic lethal interactions in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 1: 2005 0026.
24. Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Krogan NJ, Weissman JS, (2006) A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol 7: R63.
25. Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M, Kim Y, Ding H, Koh J, et al. (2010) Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat Methods 7: 1017-1024.
26. Pu S, Ronen K, Vlasblom J, Greenblatt J, Wodak SJ, (2008) Local coherence in genetic interaction patterns reveals prevalent functional versatility. Bioinformatics 24: 2376-2383.
27. Jaimovich A, Rinott R, Schuldiner M, Margalit H, Friedman N, (2010) Modularity and directionality in genetic interaction maps. Bioinformatics 26: i228-236.
28. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25-29.
29. Benschop JJ, Brabers N, van Leenen D, Bakker LV, van Deutekom HW, et al. (2010) A consensus of core protein complex compositions for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 38: 916-928.
30. Pu S, Wong J, Turner B, Cho E, Wodak SJ, (2009) Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 825-831.
31. Hart GT, Lee I, Marcotte ER, (2007) A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 236.
32. Musso G, Costanzo M, Huangfu M, Smith AM, Paw J, et al. (2008) The extensive and condition-dependent nature of epistasis among whole-genome duplicates in yeast. Genome Res 18: 1092-1099.
33. Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, et al. (2004) The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 5539-5545.
34. Vizeacoumar FJ, Chong Y, Boone C, Andrews BJ, (2009) A picture is worth a thousand words: genomics to phenomics in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 583: 1656-1661.
35. Vizeacoumar FJ, van Dyk N, F SV, Cheung V, Li J, et al. (2010) Integrating high-throughput genetic interaction mapping and high-content screening to explore yeast spindle morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 188: 69-81.
36. Byrne AB, Weirauch MT, Wong V, Koeva M, Dixon SJ, et al. (2007) A global analysis of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol 6: 8.
37. Lehner B, Crombie C, Tischler J, Fortunato A, Fraser AG, (2006) Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways. Nat Genet 38: 896-903.
38. Tweedie S, Ashburner M, Falls K, Leyland P, McQuilton P, et al. (2009) FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D555-559.
39. Hong EL, Balakrishnan R, Dong Q, Christie KR, Park J, et al. (2008) Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: new data sources and annotation methods. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D577-581.
40. Myers CL, Barrett DR, Hibbs MA, Huttenhower C, Troyanskaya OG, (2006) Finding function: evaluation methods for functional genomic data. BMC Genomics 7: 187.
41. Baudin A, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O, Denouel A, Lacroute F, Cullin C, (1993) A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 3329-3330.
42. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH, (2005) The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res 15: 1456-1461.
43. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, et al. (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13: 2498-2504.