A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Maciejasz, Paweł ^a,b,c   Eschweiler, Jörg ^c   Gerlach Hahn, Kurt ^c   Jansen Troy, Arne ^c   Leonhardt, Steffen ^c  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARM REHABILITATION; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONTROL STRATEGY; ELECTRIC ACTUATOR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HAPTIC DEVICE; HUMAN; HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PNEUMATIC ACTUATOR; PNEUMATIC ARTIFICIAL MUSCLE; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SERIES ELASTIC ACTUATOR; TACTILE STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY;

HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; ROBOTICS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84892162530     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-3     Document Type: Review

References (205)

1. Evidenzbasierte Armrehabilitation: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Evidence-based arm rehabilitation-a systematic review of the literature]. Platz T, Nervenarzt 2003 74 10 841 849 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-003-1549-7 ] 10.1007/s00115-003-1549-7 14551687 (Pubitemid 37356142)
2. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial. Feys H, Weerdt WD, Verbeke G, Steck GC, Capiau C, Kiekens C, Dejaeger E, Hoydonck GV, Vermeersch G, Cras P, Stroke 2004 35 4 924 929 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000121645.44752.f7 ] 10.1161/01.STR. 0000121645.44752.f7 15001789 (Pubitemid 38419804)
3. Functional restoration for the stroke survivor: informing the efforts of engineers. Patton J, Small SL, Rymer WZ, Top Stroke Rehabil 2008 15 6 521 541 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1506-521 ] 10.1310/tsr1506-521 19158061
4. Driving motor recovery after stroke. Richards L, Hanson C, Wellborn M, Sethi A, Top Stroke Rehabil 2008 15 5 397 411 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/ tsr1505-397 ] 10.1310/tsr1505-397 19008201
5. WHO, The global burden of disease: 2004 Update. World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 [ http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global-burden-disease/GBD-report- 2004update-full.pdf ]
6. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G, Med Biol Eng Comput 2005 43 2 10 10.1007/BF02345116 15742713 (Pubitemid 40277659)
7. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC, Top Stroke Rehabil 2007 14 6 22 44 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1406-22 ] 10.1310/tsr1406-22 18174114 (Pubitemid 350156151)
8. Mechanical designs of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: State-of-the-art and design difficulties. Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 178 187
9. Improving elbow torque output of stroke patients with assistive torque controlled by EMG signals. Cheng HS, Ju MS, Lin CCK, J Biomech Eng 2003 125 6 881 886 10.1115/1.1634284 14986414 (Pubitemid 38160039)
10. Robotic assistance of an active upper limb exercise in neurologically impaired patients. Cozens JA, Rehabil Eng, IEEE Trans 1999 7 2 254 256 10.1109/86.769416 (Pubitemid 29272936)
11. Smart portable rehabilitation devices. Mavroidis C, Nikitczuk J, Weinberg B, Danaher G, Jensen K, Pelletier P, Prugnarola J, Stuart R, Arango R, Leahey M, Pavone R, Provo A, Yasevac D, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005 2 18 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-2-18 ] 16011801
12. Assistive control system using continuous myoelectric signal in robot-aided arm training for patients after stroke. Song R, yu Tong K, Hu X, Li L, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008 16 4 371 379 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/TNSRE.2008.926707 ] 18701384
13. Variation of muscle coactivation patterns in chronic stroke during robot-assisted elbow training. Hu X, Tong KY, Song R, Tsang VS, Leung PO, Li L, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 8 1022 1029 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr. 2007.05.006 ] 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.006 17678665 (Pubitemid 47126396)
14. The therapeutic effects of myoelectrically controlled robotic system for persons after stroke-a pilot study. Song R, Tong KY, Hu XL, Tsang SF, Li L, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006 1 4945 4948 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS. 2006.260186 ] 17946664 (Pubitemid 46521022)
15. Design of a forearm rehabilitation robot. Kung PC, Ju MS, Lin CCK, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 228 233
16. Time course of abnormal synergies of stroke patients treated and assessed by a neuro-rehabilitation robot. Kung PC, Lin CCK, Ju MS, Chen SM, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 12 17
17. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Micera S, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Minuco G, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 3 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1743-0003-4-3 ] 17309790
18. Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training. Hu XL, Tong KY, Song R, Zheng XJ, Lui KH, Leung WWF, Ng S, Au-Yeung SSY, J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009 19 4 639 650 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.002 ] 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.002 18490177
19. A comparison between electromyography-driven robot and passive motion device on wrist rehabilitation for chronic stroke. Hu XL, Tong KY, Song R, Zheng XJ, Leung WWF, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 8 837 846 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968309338191 ] 10.1177/1545968309338191 19531605
20. Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis. Sale P, Lombardi V, Franceschini M, Stroke Res Treat 2012 2012 820931 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/820931 ] 23320252
21. Interactive rehabilitation robot for hand function training. Chen M, Ho SK, Zhou HF, Pang PMK, Hu XL, Ng DTW, Tong KY, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 777 780
22. Preliminary tests of an arm-grounded haptic feedback device in telemanipulation. Turner M, Gomez D, Tremblay M, Cutkosky M, Proc. of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division Anaheim, CA 1998 145 149
23. Finger exoskeleton for treatment of tendon injuries. Ertas IH, Hocaoglu E, Barkana DE, Patoglu V, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 194 201
24. An Embedded Control Platform of a Continuous Passive Motion Machine for Injured Fingers. Fuxiang Z, Rehabilitation Robotics Vienna, Austria: I-Tech Education Publishing, Kommu SS, 2007 579 606
25. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Gloreha (Hand Rehabilitation Glove) on hemiplegic patients. Pilot study. Vanoglio F, Luisa A, Garofali F, Mora C, XIII Congress of Italian Society of Neurorehabilitation, 18-20 April Italy: Bari 2013
26. Use of a continuous passive motion device for hand rehabilitation: clinical trial on neurological patients. Parrinello I, Faletti S, Santus G, 41 National Congress of Italian Society of Medicine and Physical Rehabilitation, 14-16 October Rome, Italy 2013
27. Effects of passive rehabilitation of the upper limb with robotic device Gloreha on visual-spatial and attentive exploration capacities of patients with stroke issues. Varalta V, Smania N, Geroin C, Fonte C, Gandolfi M, Picelli A, Munari D, Ianes P, Montemezzi G, La Marchina E, XIII Congress of Italian Society of Neurorehabilitation, 18-20 April Bari, Italy 2013
28. An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: task training system for stroke rehabilitation. Ho NSK, Tong KY, Hu XL, Fung KL, Wei XJ, Rong W, Susanto EA, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; Boston, MA 2011 2011 5975340 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975340 ]
29. hand EXOskeleton rehabilitation robot. Schabowsky CN, Godfrey SB, Holley RJ, Lum PS, Development and pilot testing of HEXORR, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010 7 36 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-36 ] 20667083
30. Control system for pneumatically controlled glove to assist in grasp activities. Kline T, Kamper D, Schmit B, Proc. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Chicago, IL 2005 78 81 (Pubitemid 44017764)
31. An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. Mulas M, Folgheraiter M, Gini G, Proc. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Chicago, IL 2005 371 374 (Pubitemid 44017830)
32. A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysed fingers: a case series in chronic and acute stroke patients. Hesse S, Kuhlmann H, Wilk J, Tomelleri C, Kirker SGB, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008 5 21 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-21 ] 18771581
33. An Orthotic Hand-Assistive Exoskeleton for Actuated Pinch and Grasp. Rotella MF, Reuther KE, Hofmann CL, Hage EB, BuSha BF, Bioengineering Conference, IEEE 35th Annual Northeast Boston, MA 2009 1 2 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NEBC.2009.4967693 ]
34. Occupational and physical therapy using a hand exoskeleton based exerciser. Sarakoglou I, Tsagarakis NG, Caldwell DG, Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) Sendai, Japan 2004 2973 2978 (Pubitemid 40276047)
35. An intention driven hand functions task training robotic system. Tong KY, Ho SK, Pang PK, Hu XL, Tam WK, Fung KL, Wei XJ, Chen PN, Chen M, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Buenos Aires, Argentina 2010 3406 3409 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/IEMBS.2010.5627930 ]
36. Development and control of a hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation of hand injuries. Wege A, Hommel G, Intelligent Robots and Systems, (IROS 2005). 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Edmonton, Canada 2005 3046 3051
37. An Actuated Finger Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation Following Stroke. Worsnopp TT, Peshkin MA, Colgate JE, Kamper DG, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 896 901
38. A wearable device for repetitive hand therapy. Xing K, Xu Q, He J, Wang Y, Liu Z, Huang X, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics BioRob Scottsdale, AZ 2008 919 923
39. ACT 3D exercise targets gravity-induced discoordination and improves reaching work area in individuals with stroke. Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JPA, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 890 895
40. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 5 619 630 10.1682/JRRD.2005.03.0056 17123203 (Pubitemid 44759899)
41. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Chang JJ, Tung WL, Wu WL, Huang MH, Su FC, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 10 1332 1338 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.016 ] 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.016 17908578 (Pubitemid 47483667)
42. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, OTR LE, Diels C, Aisen M, Neurology 2000 54 10 1938 1944 10.1212/WNL.54.10.1938 10822433 (Pubitemid 30327116)
43. A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Rabadi M, Galgano M, Lynch D, Akerman M, Lesser M, Volpe B, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 12 1071 1082 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1177/0269215508095358 ] 10.1177/0269215508095358 19052246
44. A rehabilitation robot with force-position hybrid fuzzy controller: hybrid fuzzy control of rehabilitation robot. Ju MS, Lin CCK, Lin DH, Hwang IS, Chen SM, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 3 349 358 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847354 ] 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847354 16200758 (Pubitemid 41416015)
45. Development of a 3DOF mobile exoskeleton robot for human upper-limb motion assist. Kiguchi K, Rahman MH, Sasaki M, Teramoto K, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2008 56 8 678 691 [ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/B6V16-4R8MDRP-1/2/7d307e7bbef3e5958a6960e3da652723 ] 10.1016/j.robot.2007.11.007
46. Design of a new 5 d.o.f. wire-based robot for rehabilitation. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S, Rossi A, Proc. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Chicago, IL 2005 430 433 (Pubitemid 44017843)
47. Measuring changes of movement dynamics during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Colombo R, Sterpi I, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Minuco G, Pisano F, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010 18 75 85 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2028831 ] 19666344
48. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, der Loos MV, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 7 952 959 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 12098155 (Pubitemid 34747579)
49. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. Lum PS, Burgar CG, der Loos MV, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Yap R, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 5 631 642 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0044 17123204 (Pubitemid 44759900)
50. Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004 12 2 186 194 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2004.827225 ] 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.827225 15218933 (Pubitemid 38765749)
51. Design Results of an Upper Extremity Exoskeleton. Moubarak S, Pham M, Pajdla T, Redarce T, Proc. 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering Antwerp, Belgium 2008
52. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, Armani M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 2 142 149 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 ] 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 17270510 (Pubitemid 46161321)
53. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. Masiero S, Armani M, Rosati G, J Rehabil Res Dev 2011 48 4 355 366 10.1682/JRRD.2010. 04.0063 21674388
54. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study. Fazekas G, Horvath M, Troznai T, Toth A, J Rehabil Med 2007 39 7 580 582 [ http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mjl/sreh/ 2007/00000039/00000007/art00013 ] 10.2340/16501977-0087 17724559 (Pubitemid 47455228)
55. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 6 915 920 10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04954-7 12808550 (Pubitemid 36682345)
56. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau ML, Stroke 2005 36 9 1960 1966 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000177865.37334.ce ] 10.1161/01.STR.0000177865.37334.ce 16109908 (Pubitemid 41266534)
57. Supinator Extender (SUE): a pneumatically actuated robot for forearm/wrist rehabilitation after stroke. Allington J, Spencer SJ, Klein J, Buell M, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow J, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011 2011 1579 1582 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090459 ] 22254624
58. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Cordo P, Lutsep H, Cordo L, Wright WG, Cacciatore T, Skoss R, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 67 77 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308317437 ] 18645190
59. A pneumatic muscle hand therapy device. Koeneman EJ, Schultz RS, Wolf SL, Herring DE, Koeneman JB, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004 4 2711 2713 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403777 ] 17270836 (Pubitemid 40035599)
60. Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Kutner NG, Zhang R, Butler AJ, Wolf SL, Alberts JL, Phys Ther 2010 90 4 493 504 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090160 ] 10.2522/ptj.20090160 20185616
61. Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. Rosenstein L, Ridgel AL, Thota A, Samame B, Alberts JL, Am J Occup Ther 2008 62 28 35 10.5014/ajot.62.1.28 18254428
62. Combined use of repetitive task practice and an assistive robotic device in a patient with subacute stroke. Frick EM, Alberts JL, Phys Ther 2006 86 10 1378 1386 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20050149 ] 10.2522/ptj.20050149 17012642 (Pubitemid 44497072)
63. Development of ADLER: The activities of daily living exercise robot. Johnson M, Wisneski K, Anderson J, Nathan D, Smith R, 1st IEEE/RAS-EMBS Int. Conf. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob Pisa, Italy 2006 881 886 (Pubitemid 44931239)
64. Quantifying kinematics of purposeful movements to real, imagined, or absent functional objects: implications for modelling trajectories for robot-assisted ADL tasks. Wisneski KJ, Johnson MJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 7 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-7 ] 17381842
65. Upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: ARAMIS a "robo- mechatronic" innovative approach and prototype. Pignolo L, Dolce G, Basta G, Lucca LF, Serra S, Sannita WG, 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Rome, Italy 2012 1410 1414 [ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6290868 ]
66. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stokes E, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 5 395 405 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215507085060 ] 10.1177/0269215507085060 18441036 (Pubitemid 351833329)
67. A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke. Culmer PR, Jackson AE, Makower SG, Cozens JA, Levesley MC, Mon-Williams M, Bhakta B, J Neurosci Methods 2011 197 2 259 269 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03.004 ] 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03. 004 21414360
68. Task-oriented perception-assist for an upper-limb powerassist exoskeleton robot. Kiguchi K, Kose Y, Hayashi Y, Proc. World Automation Congress (WAC) Kobe, Japan 2010 1 6 [ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs-all.jsp?arnumber= 5665314 ]
69. Robotic assisted rehabilitation in virtual reality with the L-EXOS. Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Borelli L, Montagner A, Greco G, Procopio C, Carboncini M, Rossi B, Proc. of 7th ICDVRAT with ArtAbilitation Maia, Portugal 2008 253 260
70. A Configuration-Space Approach to Controlling a Rehabilitation Arm Exoskeleton. Carignan C, Tang J, Roderick S, Naylor M, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 179 187
71. Robot-assisted virtual rehabilitation (NJIT-RAVR) system for children with upper extremity hemiplegia. Fluet GG, Qiu Q, Saleh S, Ramirez D, Adamovich S, Kelly D, Parikh H, Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference Haifa, Israel 2009 189 192
72. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008 16 3 286 297 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ TNSRE.2008.918389 ] 18586608 (Pubitemid 351832426)
73. Arm-Training with T-WREX After Chronic Stroke: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Housman SJ, Le V, Rahman T, Sanchez RJ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 562 568
74. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 5 505 514 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308331148 ] 10.1177/1545968308331148 19237734
75. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T, Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006 14 3 378 389 [ http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881553 ] 17009498 (Pubitemid 44543562)
76. Design of a haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation. Gupta A, O'Malley M, IEEE ASME Trans Mechatronics 2006 11 3 280
77. A haptic knob for rehabilitation of hand function. Lambercy O, Dovat L, Gassert R, Burdet E, Teo CL, Milner T, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 3 356 366 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903913 ] 17894268 (Pubitemid 47460418)
78. A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients. Casadio M, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V, Clin Rehabil 2009 23 3 217 228 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1177/0269215508096759 ] 10.1177/0269215508096759 19218297
79. Robot-based rehabilitation of the upper limbs in multiple sclerosis: feasibility and preliminary results. Carpinella I, Cattaneo D, Abuarqub S, Ferrarin M, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 12 966 970 [ http://www.ingentaconnect.com/ content/mjl/sreh/2009/00000041/00000012/art00004 ] 10.2340/16501977-0401 19841825
80. A Haptic Robot Reveals the Adaptation Capability of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis. Casadio M, Sanguineti V, Solaro C, Morasso PG, Int J Rob Res 2007 26 11-12 1225 1233 10.1177/0278364907084981 (Pubitemid 350114645)
81. Adaptive robot training for the treatment of incoordination in Multiple Sclerosis. Vergaro E, Squeri V, Brichetto G, Casadio M, Morasso P, Solaro C, Sanguineti V, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010 7 37 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743- 0003-7-37 ] 20670420
82. Control system design of a 3-DOF upper limbs rehabilitation robot. Denève A, Moughamir S, Afilal L, Zaytoon J, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008 89 2 202 214 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.006 ] 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.006 17881080
83. Development of rehabilitation support robot for personalized rehabilitation of upper limbs. Furuhashi Y, Nagasaki M, Aoki T, Morita Y, Ukai H, Matsui N, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 787 792
84. Mathai A, Qiu Q, Incorporating Haptic Effects Into Three-Dimensional Virtual Environments to Train the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity 2009 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2028830 ]
85. Initial clinical tests for assessment models of synergy movements of stroke patients using PLEMO system with sensor grip device. Ozawa T, Kikuchi T, Fukushima K, Akai H, Fukuda T, Tanida S, Fujikawa T, Kano S, Furusho J, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 873 878
86. RUPERT closed loop control design. Zhang H, Balasubramanian S, Wei R, Austin H, Buchanan S, Herman R, He J, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010 2010 3686 3689 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627647 ] 21097049
87. Design and control of two planar cable-driven robots for upper-limb neurorehabilitation. Rosati G, Zanotto D, Secoli R, Rossi A, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto, Japan 2009 560 565
88. Modeling and evaluation of human motor skills in a virtual tennis task. Tanaka Y, Ishii M, Tsuji T, Imamura N, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; Vancouver, Canada 2008 2008 4190 4193 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2008. 4650133 ]
89. A novel robot neurorehabilitation for upper limb motion. Xiu-Feng Z, Lin-Hong J, Li-Yun G, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; Shanghai, China 2005 5 5040 5043 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1615608 ]
90. ARMin-Exoskeleton Robot for Stroke Rehabilitation. Nef T, Guidali M, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R, World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12 Munich, Germany: Springer, Dössel O, Schlegel WC, 2009 127 130
91. Effects of arm training with the robotic device ARMin I in chronic stroke: three single cases. Nef T, Quinter G, Müller R, Riener R, Neurodegener Dis 2009 6 5-6 240 251 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000262444 ] 10.1159/000262444 19940461
92. Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases. Staubli P, Nef T, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 46 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-46 ] 20017939
93. The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Gijbels D, Lamers I, Kerkhofs L, Alders G, Knippenberg E, Feys P, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 5 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1743-0003-8-5 ] 21261965
94. Reach & grasp therapy: Effects of the Gentle/G System assessing sub-acute stroke whole-arm rehabilitation. Loureiro RCV, Lamperd B, Collin C, Harwin WS, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Kyoto 2009 755 760
95. Robot-aided therapy for upper limbs in patients with stroke-related lesions. Brief report of a clinical experience. Bovolenta F, Sale P, Dall'Armi V, Clerici P, Franceschini M, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 18 21477331
96. Robot-assisted therapy for neuromuscular training of sub-acute stroke patients. A feasibility study. Treger I, Faran S, Ring H, Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008 44 4 431 435 19002092
97. Upper-limb powered exoskeleton design. Perry JC, Rosen J, Burns S, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Trans 2007 12 4 408 417 (Pubitemid 47337534)
98. Five-fingered assistive hand with mechanical compliance of human finger. Hasegawa Y, Mikami Y, Watanabe K, Sankai Y, IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Pasadena, CA 2008 718 724
99. Design and validation of a rehabilitation robotic exoskeleton for tremor assessment and suppression. Rocon E, Belda-Lois JM, Ruiz AF, Manto M, Moreno JC, Pons JL, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 3 367 378 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903917 ] 17894269 (Pubitemid 47460420)
100. Upper limb tremor suppression in ADL via an orthosis incorporating a controllable double viscous beam actuator. Loureiro RCV, Belda-Lois JM, Lima ER, Pons JL, Sanchez-Lacuesta JJ, Harwin WS, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR Chicago, IL 2005 119 122 (Pubitemid 44017773)
101. MUNDUS project: MUltimodal Neuroprosthesis for daily upper limb support. Pedrocchi A, Ferrante S, Ambrosini E, Gandolla M, Casellato C, Schauer T, Klauer C, Pascual J, Vidaurre C, Gfoehler M, Reichenfelser W, Karner J, Micera S, Crema A, Molteni F, Rossini M, Palumbo G, Guanziroli E, Jedlitschka A, Hack M, Bulgheroni M, D Amico E, Schenk P, Zwicker S, Duschau-Wicke A, Miseikis J, Graber L, Ferrigno G, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013 10 66 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1743-0003-10-66 ] 23822118
102. Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. Dijkers MP, deBear PC, Erlandson RF, Kristy K, Geer DM, Nichols A, J Rehabil Res Dev 1991 28 2 33 44 10.1682/JRRD.1991.04.0033
103. Stroke. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM, Lancet 2008 371 9624 1612 1623 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60694 -7] 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60694-7 18468545 (Pubitemid 351626845)
104. Development of isokinetic and iso-contractile exercise machine MEM-MRB using MR brake. Oda K, Isozumi S, Ohyama Y, Tamida K, Kikuchi T, Furusho J, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 6 11
105. Quasi-3-DOF rehabilitation system for upper limbs: its force-feedback mechanism and software for rehabilitation. Kikuchi T, Xinghao H, Fukushima K, Oda K, Furusho J, Inoue A, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 24 27
106. Monitoring functional arm movement for home-based therapy after stroke. Sanchez R, Reinkensmeyer D, Shah P, Liu J, Rao S, Smith R, Cramer S, Rahman T, Bobrow J, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; San Francisco, CA 2004 7 4787 4790 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1404325 ] (Pubitemid 40034926)
107. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998 6 75 87 10.1109/86.662623 9535526 (Pubitemid 28167922)
108. Robot-mediated Active Rehabilitation (ACRE) A user trial. Schoone M, van Os P, Campagne A, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 477 481
109. A low cost parallel robot and trajectory optimization method for wrist and forearm rehabilitation using the Wii. Spencer SJ, Klein J, Minakata K, Le V, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 869 874
110. Development of Wrist Rehabilitation Equipment Using Pneumatic Parallel Manipulator. Takaiwa M, Noritsugu T, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Barcelona, Spain 2005 2302 2307 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570456 ] (Pubitemid 46084131)
111. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 4 560 569 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.908560 ] 18198714 (Pubitemid 350274177)
112. Development and evaluation of a gravity compensated training environment for robotic rehabilitation of post-stroke reaching. Beer RF, Naujokas C, Bachrach B, Mayhew D, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 205 210
113. HandCARE: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. Dovat L, Lambercy O, Gassert R, Maeder T, Milner T, Leong TC, Burdet E, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008 16 6 582 591 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2010347 ] 19144590
114. An exoskeletal robot for human shoulder joint motion assist. Kiguchi K, Iwami K, Yasuda M, Watanabe K, Fukuda T, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on 2003 8 125 135 10.1109/TMECH.2003.809168
115. Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction. Schiele A, van der Helm FCT, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006 14 4 456 469 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881565 ] 17190037 (Pubitemid 46110475)
116. Developing a whole-arm exoskeleton robot with hand opening and closing mechanism for upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Ren Y, Park HS, Zhang LQ, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 761 765
117. Research on Exoskeletons at the TU Berlin. Fleischer C, Kondak K, Wege A, Kossyk I, Proceedings of German Workshop on Robotics, June 9-10 Braunschweig, Germany 2009 [ http://www.gwr09.org/download/paper/gwr09-0043.pdf ]
118. Optimization of a parallel shoulder mechanism to achieve a high-force, low-mass, robotic-arm exoskeleton. Klein J, Spencer S, Allington J, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Robotics, IEEE Trans 2010 26 4 710 715
119. Design, control and performance of RiceWrist: a force feedback wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation and training. Gupta A, O'Malley M, Patoglu V, Burgar C, Int J Robot Res 2008 27 2 233 10.1177/0278364907084261 (Pubitemid 351169717)
120. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor PC, der Loos HFMV, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 6 663 673 [ http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jour/00/37/6/pdf/ burgar.pdf ] 11321002 (Pubitemid 34117273)
121. Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy. Amirabdollahian F, Loureiro R, Gradwell E, Collin C, Harwin W, Johnson G, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 4 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-4 ] 17309791
122. HapticMaster-a generic force controlled robot for human interaction. Van Der Linde R, Lammertse P, Industrial Robot: Int J 2003 30 6 515 524 10.1108/01439910310506783
123. Reach & Grasp Therapy: Design and Control of a 9-DOF Robotic Neuro-rehabilitation System. Loureiro RCV, Harwin WS, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 757 763
124. HEnRiE-Haptic environment for reaching and grasping exercise. Mihelj M, Podobnik J, Munih M, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 907 912
125. report of the first clinical test and the follow-up system improvement. Toth A, Fazekas G, Arz G, Jurak M, Horvath M, Passive robotic movement therapy of the spastic hemiparetic arm with REHAROB, Proc. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Chicago, IL 2005 127 130
126. A Control Strategy for Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation With a Dual Robot System. Culmer PR, Jackson AE, Makower S, Richardson R, Cozens JA, Levesley MC, Bhakta BB, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Trans 2009 PP 99 1 11
127. Pneumatic robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation. Morales R, Badesa FJ, García-Aracil N, Sabater JM, Pėrez-Vidal C, Med Biol Eng Comput 2011 49 10 1145 1156 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0814-3 ] 10.1007/s11517-011-0814-3 21822631
128. Virtual reality and a haptic master-slave set-up in post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation. Houtsma JA, Houten FJAMV, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006 220 6 715 718 10.1243/09544119H06104 16961191 (Pubitemid 46116926)
129. Rehabilitation robotics, orthotics and prosthetics. In Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation Cambridge Univ Press, Selzer M, Clarke S, Cohen L, Duncan P, Gage F, 2006
130. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC, Brain 2008 131 Pt 2 425 437 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm311 ] 18156154 (Pubitemid 351197615)
131. Development of a new exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation. Vertechy R, Frisoli A, Dettori A, Solazzi M, Bergamasco M, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 188 193
132. A simple robotic system for neurorehabilitation. Micera S, Carrozza M, Guglielmelli E, Cappiello G, Zaccone F, Freschi C, Colombo R, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Pisano F, et al. Autonomous Robots 2005 19 3 271 284 10.1007/s10514-005-4749-0 (Pubitemid 43057760)
133. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. Krebs H, Ferraro M, Buerger S, Newbery M, Makiyama A, Sandmann M, Lynch D, Volpe B, Hogan N, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004 1 5 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1186/1743-0003-1-5 ] 15679916
134. Braccio di Ferro: a new haptic workstation for neuromotor rehabilitation. Casadio M, Sanguineti V, Morasso PG, Arrichiello V, Technol Health Care 2006 14 3 123 142 16971753 (Pubitemid 44359499)
135. "Hybrid-PLEMO", rehabilitation system for upper limbs with active / passive force feedback, and its application for facilitation techniques. Kikuchi T, Ozawa T, Akai H, Furusho J, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 781 786
136. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 6 653 662 11321001
137. Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer WZ, Burgar C, Top Stroke Rehabil 2002 8 4 40 53 10.1310/9KFM-KF81-P9A4-5WW0 14523729 (Pubitemid 34226095)
138. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Williams D, Celestino J, Charles SK, Lynch D, Hogan N, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 3 327 335 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE. 2007.903899 ] 17894265 (Pubitemid 47460417)
139. Universal Haptic Drive: A Robot for Arm and Wrist Rehabilitation. Oblak J, Cikajlo I, Matjacic Z, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2034162 ]
140. "Soft" Exoskeletons for Upper and Lower Body Rehabilitation-Design, Control and Testing. Caldwell DC, Tsagarakis N, Int J Humanoid Robot 2007 4 1 24 10.1142/S0219843607000947 (Pubitemid 46746031)
141. Series elastic actuators. Pratt GA, Williamson MM, Intelligent Robots and Systems 95. 'Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots', Proceedings. 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Pittsburgh, PA 1995 399 406
142. Design of a Mobile, Inexpensive Device for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation at Home. Sulzer JS, Peshkin MA, Patton JL, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 933 937
143. Orthopaedic rehabilitation: A powered elbow orthosis using compliant actuation. Vanderniepen I, Van Ham R, Van Damme M, Versluys R, Lefeber D, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 172 177
144. Design of a single-dof active hand orthosis for neurorehabilitation. Rosati G, Cenci S, Boschetti G, Zanotto D, Masiero S, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 161 166
145. Control of a pneumatic orthosis for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. Wolbrecht ET, Leavitt J, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; New York, NY 2006 1 2687 2693 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/IEMBS.2006.259941 ] (Pubitemid 46520462)
146. Development of Active Support Splint driven by Pneumatic Soft Actuator (ASSIST). Sasaki D, Noritsugu T, Takaiwa M, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Barcelona, Spain 2005 520 525 (Pubitemid 46083850)
147. An EMG-controlled hand exoskeleton for natural pinching. Lucas L, DiCicco M, Matsuoka Y, J Robot Mechatronics 2004 16 482 488 (Pubitemid 39526723)
148. Development and control of a "soft-actuated" exoskeleton for use in physiotherapy and training. Tsagarakis N, Caldwell D, Autonomous Robots 2003 15 21 33 10.1023/A:1024484615192
149. Development of muscle suit for supporting manual worker. Kobayashi H, Nozaki H, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) San Diego, CA 2007 1769 1774
150. Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. Chou CP, Hannaford B, IEEE Trans Robot Automation 1996 12 90 102 10.1109/70.481753 (Pubitemid 126780450)
151. RUPERT: An exoskeleton robot for assisting rehabilitation of arm functions. Balasubramanian S, Wei R, Perez M, Shepard B, Koeneman E, Koeneman J, He J, Proc. Virtual Rehabilitation Vancouver, Canada 2008 163 167 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2008.4625154 ]
152. A study on power-assisted rehabilitation robot arms operated by patient with upper limb disabilities. Umemura A, Saito Y, Fujisaki K, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 451 456
153. Design of a flexible fluidic actuation system for a hybrid elbow orthosis. Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Gaiser I, Werner T, Schulz S, Bretthauer G, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 167 171
154. Dampace: Design of an exoskeleton for force-coordination training in upper-extremity rehabilitation. Stienen A, Hekman E, Prange G, Jannink M, Aalsma A, van der Helm F, van der Kooij H, J Med Devices 2009 3 031003 10.1115/1.3191727
155. Design of a rotational hydro-elastic actuator for an active upper-extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton. Stienen AHA, Hekman EEG, ter Braak H, Aalsma AMM, van der Helm FCT, van der Kooij H, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 881 888
156. Characterization of multi-finger twist motion toward robotic rehabilitation. Scherer R, Pradhan S, Dellon B, Kim D, Klatzky R, Matsuoka Y, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Kyoto, Japan 2009 812 817
157. Use of Magnetorheological fluid in a force feedback glove. Winter SH, Bouzit M, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 2 8 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/TNSRE.2007.891401 ] 17436869
158. MR-CHIROD v.2: magnetic resonance compatible smart hand rehabilitation device for brain imaging. Khanicheh A, Mintzopoulos D, Weinberg B, Tzika AA, Mavroidis C, Neural Syst Rehabil Eng IEEE Trans 2008 16 91 98
159. A 3-D rehabilitation system for upper limbs developed in a 5-year NEDO project and its clinical testing. Furusho J, Koyanagi K, Imada Y, Fujii Y, Nakanishi K, Domen K, Miyakoshi K, Ryu U, Takenaka S, Inoue A, Chicago, IL 2005 53 56
160. A 6-DOF Rehabilitation Support System for Upper Limbs including Wrists "Robotherapist" with Physical Therapy. Furusho J, Kikuchi T, Oda K, Ohyama Y, Morita T, Shichi N, Jin Y, Inoue A, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 304 309
161. Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview. Hamid S, Hayek R, Eur Spine J 2008 17 9 1256 1269 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0729-3 ] 10.1007/s00586-008-0729-3 18677518
162. Increasing muscle strength and mass of thigh in elderly people with the hybrid-training method of electrical stimulation and volitional contraction. Takano Y, Haneda Y, Maeda T, Sakai Y, Matsuse H, Kawaguchi T, Tagawa Y, Shiba N, Tohoku J Exp Med 2010 221 77 85 10.1620/tjem.221.77 20453461
163. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Med Eng Phys 2009 31 3 364 373 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.05. 008 ] 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.05.008 18640865
164. Combined Electromyography(EMG)-driven system with functional electrical stimulation (FES) for poststroke rehabilitation. Li R, Hu XL, Tong KY, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 642 646
165. Design, Characterization, and Impedance Limits of a Hand Robot. Masia L, Krebs HI, Cappa P, Hogan N, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 1085 1089
166. SUEFUL-7: A 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K, Li Y, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) St. Louis, MO 2009 1126 1131
167. Feasibility of integrating FES grasp assistance with a task-oriented robot-assisted therapy environment: A case study. Nathan DE, Johnson MJ, McGuire J, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 807 812
168. The design of a five-degree-of-freedom powered orthosis for the upper limb. Johnson GR, Carus DA, Parrini G, Marchese SS, Valeggi R, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2001 215 3 275 284 10.1243/0954411011535867 11436270 (Pubitemid 34449631)
169. A myosignal-based powered exoskeleton system. Rosen J, Brand M, Fuchs MB, Arcan M, IEEE Trans Syst, Man and Cybernet, Part A 2001 31 3 210 222 10.1109/3468.925661 (Pubitemid 32585017)
170. An exoskeleton system for elbow joint motion rehabilitation. Kiguchi K, Esaki R, Tsuruta T, Watanabe K, Fukuda T, Proc. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) Port Island, Japan 2003 1228 1233. vol.2
171. Case study: A myoelectrically controlled shoulder-elbow orthosis for unrecovered brachial plexus injury. Ögce F, Özyalçin H, Prosthet Orthot Int 2000 24 3 252 255 10.1080/03093640008726557 11195363
172. Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke. Stein J, Narendran K, McBean J, Krebs K, Hughes R, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007 86 4 255 261 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM. 0b013e3180383cc5 ] 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3180383cc5 17413538 (Pubitemid 46606776)
173. e100 NeuroRobotic system. Stein J, Expert Rev Med Devices 2009 6 15 19 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/17434440.6.1.15 ] 10.1586/17434440.6.1.15 19105775
174. A human forearm and wrist motion assist exoskeleton robot with EMG-based Fuzzy-neuro control. Gopura RAR, Kiguchi K, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 550 555
175. Myoelectrically Controlled Robotic System That Provide Voluntary Mechanical Help for Persons after Stroke. Song R, Tong KY, Hu XL, Zheng XJ, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 246 249
176. sEMG Based Control for 5 DOF Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot System. Li Q, Wang D, Du Z, Song Y, Sun L, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) Kunming, China 2006 1305 1310
177. [ARMOR: an electromechanical robot for upper limb training following stroke. A prospective randomised controlled pilot study]. Mayr A, Kofler M, Saltuari L, Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2008 40 66 73 [ http://dx.doi.org/10. 1055/s-2007-989425 ] 10.1055/s-2007-989425 18322901 (Pubitemid 351438228)
178. Development of a Hand Motion Assist Robot for Rehabilitation Therapy by Patient Self-Motion Control. Kawasaki H, Ito S, Ishigure Y, Nishimoto Y, Aoki T, Mouri T, Sakaeda H, Abe M, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 234 240
179. Pinpointed muscle force control using a power-assisting device: System configuration and experiment. Ding M, Ueda J, Ogasawara T, Proc. 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) Scottsdale, AZ 2008 181 186
180. A haptic-robotic platform for upper-limb reaching stroke therapy: preliminary design and evaluation results. Lam P, Hebert D, Boger J, Lacheray H, Gardner D, Apkarian J, Mihailidis A, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008 5 15 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-15 ] 18498641
181. EMG-based visual-haptic biofeedback: a tool to improve motor control in children with primary dystonia. Casellato C, Pedrocchi A, Zorzi G, Vernisse L, Ferrigno G, Nardocci N, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013 21 3 474 480 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2222445 ] 23060345
182. Haptic Device System for Upper Limb Motor and Cognitive Function Rehabilitation: Grip Movement Comparison between Normal Subjects and Stroke Patients. Takahashi Y, Terada T, Inoue K, Ito Y, Ikeda Y, Lee H, Komeda T, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 736 741
183. HIFE-haptic interface for finger exercise. Mali U, Munih M, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Trans 2006 11 93 102 (Pubitemid 43280489)
184. The Rutgers Master II-new design force-feedback glove. Bouzit M, Burdea G, Popescu G, Boian R, Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Trans 2002 7 2 256 263 10.1109/TMECH.2002.1011262
185. A virtual-reality-based telerehabilitation system with force feedback. Popescu VG, Burdea GC, Bouzit M, Hentz VR, IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2000 4 45 51 10.1109/4233.826858 10761773 (Pubitemid 30583140)
186. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H, Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, IEEE Trans 2001 9 3 308 318 10.1109/7333.948460 (Pubitemid 32852069)
187. A virtual reality-based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke. Adamovich SV, Merians AS, Boian R, Lewis JA, Tremaine M, Burdea GS, Recce M, Poizner H, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environ 2005 14 2 161 174 (Pubitemid 40785669)
188. Visual feedback distortion in a robotic environment for hand rehabilitation. Brewer BR, Klatzky R, Matsuoka Y, Brain Res Bull 2008 75 6 804 813 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.006 ] 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.006 18394527
189. Design and Development of a Haptic Peg-Board Exercise for the Rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis. Xydas EG, Louca LS, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 906 916
190. Effect of robotic-assisted three-dimensional repetitive motion to improve hand motor function and control in children with handwriting deficits: a nonrandomized phase 2 device trial. Palsbo SE, Hood-Szivek P, Am J Occup Ther 2012 66 6 682 690 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.004556 ] 10.5014/ajot.2012.004556 23106988
191. Recovery of hand function in virtual reality: Training hemiparetic hand and arm together or separately. Adamovich S, Fluet GG, Merians AS, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; Vancouver, Canada 2008 2008 3475 3478 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649954 ]
192. Design of a complex virtual reality simulation to train finger motion for persons with hemiparesis: a proof of concept study. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Lewis J, Merians AS, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 28 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-28 ] 19615045
193. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 20 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 ] 19531254
194. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Exp Brain Res 2006 168 3 368 383 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00221-005-0097-8 ] 10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8 16249912 (Pubitemid 41830946)
195. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation. Part 1-Theory. Hogan N, J Dynamic Syst, Meas Control 1985 107 1 7 (Pubitemid 15513933)
196. Unified Impedance and Admittance Control. Ott C, Mukherjee R, Nakamura Y, Proc. IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Anchorage, AK 2010 554 561
197. Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleleton in Virtual Reality. Frisoli A, Borelli L, Montagner A, Marcheschi S, Procopio C, Salsedo F, Bergamasco M, Carboncini MC, Tolaini M, Rossi B, Proc. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Noordwijk, Netherlands 2007 631 642
198. Clinical designs of recent robot rehabilitation trials. Lo AC, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012 91 11 Suppl 3 204 S216 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM. 0b013e31826bcfa3 ] 23080037
199. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 2 111 121 17876068 (Pubitemid 351287594)
200. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 4 D006876 [ http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub2/full ] 18843735
201. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, Kingma H, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 1 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-1 ] 19154570
202. Transfer of scientific concepts to clinical practice: recent robot-assisted training studies. Waldner A, Tomelleri C, Hesse S, Funct Neurol 2009 24 4 173 177 20412721
203. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever Jr CT, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P, N Engl J Med 2010 362 19 1772 1783 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 ] 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 20400552
204. What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation? Brochard S, Robertson J, Médée B, Rémy-Néris O, Curr Opin Neurol 2010 23 6 683 687 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833f61ce ] 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833f61ce 20852420
205. Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Boninger ML, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012 9 17 [ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-17 ] 22463132