Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: Four single-cases

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Staubli, Patricia ^a,b   Nef, Tobias ^c,d   Klamroth Marganska, Verena ^a,b   Riener, Robert ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^c Catholic University of America   (United States)

^d NATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PARESIS; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TIME; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ARM; CHRONIC DISEASE; EXERCISE MOVEMENT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PARESIS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 74849121213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-46     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Stroke incidence, case fatality, and mortality in the WHO MONICA project. World Health Organization Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease. P Thorvaldsen K Asplund K Kuulasmaa AM Rajakangas M Schroll, Stroke 1995 26 361 367 7886707
2. Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory. M Brainin N Bornstein G Boysen V Demarin, Eur J Neurol 2000 7 5 10 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.007001005.x 10809909
3. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. W Rosamond K Flegal G Friday K Furie A Go K Greenlund N Haase M Ho V Howard B Kissela, et al. Circulation 2007 115 69 171 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 106.179918 17194875
4. HC Maeurer HC Diener, Der Schlaganfall Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 1996
5. Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. PM Rossini C Calautti F Pauri JC Baron, Lancet Neurol 2003 2 493 502 10.1016/S1474-4422(03) 00485-X 12878437
6. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. H Nakayama HS Jorgensen HO Raaschou TS Olsen, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994 75 394 398 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9 8172497 (Pubitemid 24134114)
7. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. JR Carey TJ Kimberley SM Lewis EJ Auerbach L Dorsey P Rundquist K Ugurbil, Brain 2002 125 773 788 10.1093/brain/awf091 11912111
8. Forced Use of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke Patients: Results From a Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. J van der Lee R Wagenaar G Lankhorst T Vogelaar W Deville L Bouter, Stroke 1999 30 2369 2375 10548673
9. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. G Kwakkel RC Wagenaar TW Koelman GJ Lankhorst JC Koetsier, Stroke 1997 28 1550 1556 9259747
10. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. A Sunderland DJ Tinson EL Bradley D Fletcher R Langton Hewer DT Wade, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992 55 530 535 10.1136/jnnp.55.7.530 1640226
11. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. C Butefisch H Hummelsheim P Denzler KH Mauritz, J Neurol Sci 1995 130 59 68 10.1016/0022-510X(95)00003-K 7650532
12. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. G Kwakkel R van Peppen RC Wagenaar S Wood Dauphinee C Richards A Ashburn K Miller N Lincoln C Partridge I Wellwood P Langhorne, Stroke 2004 35 2529 2539 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d 15472114
13. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. N Maclean P Pound C Wolfe A Rudd, BMJ 2000 321 1051 1054 10.1136/bmj.321.7268. 1051 11053175
14. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. PS Lum CG Burgar PC Shor M Majmundar M Van der Loos, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 952 959 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 12098155
15. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. DJ Reinkensmeyer JL Emken SC Cramer, Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004 6 497 525 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6. 040803.140223 15255778
16. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. R Riener T Nef G Colombo, Med Biol Eng Comput 2005 43 2 10 10.1007/BF02345116 15742713
17. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. GB Prange MJ Jannink CG Groothuis-Oudshoorn HJ Hermens MJ Ijzerman, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 171 184 10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076 16847784
18. Cortical reorganization - effects of intensive therapy. G Nelles, Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004 22 239 244 15502268
19. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. G Kwakkel BJ Kollen HI Krebs, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 111 121 17876068
20. Evaluating outcome in stroke rehabilitation (quality control and clinical audit). DT Wade, Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1992 26 97 104 1488644
21. ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. T Nef M Mihelj R Riener, Med Biol Eng Comput 2007 45 887 900 10.1007/s11517-007-0226-6 17674069
22. A novel paradigm for patient-cooperative control of upper limb rehabilitation robots. M Mihelj T Nef R Riener, Advanced Robotics 2007 21 843 867 10.1163/156855307780851975 (Pubitemid 47184834)
23. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. SE Fasoli HI Krebs J Stein WR Frontera R Hughes N Hogan, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 85 1106 1111 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.028 15241758
24. ARMin III - Arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. T Nef M Guidali R Riener, Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2009 6 127 142 10.1080/11762320902840179
25. Effects of Arm Training with the Robotic Device ARMin I in Chronic Stroke: Three Single Cases. T Nef G Quinter R Muller R Riener, Neurodegener Dis 2009 19940461
26. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. NA Bayona J Bitensky K Salter R Teasell, Top Stroke Rehabil 2005 12 58 65 16110428 (Pubitemid 41233414)
27. Neuroplasticity promoted by task complexity. JR Carey E Bhatt A Nagpal, Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005 33 24 31 15640717
28. A motor learning model for rehabilitation. JH Carr RB Shepherd, Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation Rockville (MD): Aspen 1987 31 91
29. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. AR Fugl-Meyer L Jaasko I Leyman S Olsson S Steglind, Scand J Rehabil Med 1975 7 13 31 1135616
30. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. PW Duncan M Propst SG Nelson, Phys Ther 1983 63 1606 1610 6622535
31. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. DJ Gladstone CJ Danells SE Black, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002 16 232 240 10.1177/154596802401105171 12234086
32. Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy. F Amirabdollahian R Loureiro E Gradwell C Collin W Harwin G Johnson, J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2007 4 4 10.1186/1743-0003-4-4 (Pubitemid 46393943)
33. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. SL Wolf PA Catlin M Ellis AL Archer B Morgan A Piacentino, Stroke 2001 32 1635 1639 11441212
34. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. DM Morris G Uswatte JE Crago EW Cook E Taub, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 750 755 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183 11387578
35. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. P Azouvi S Olivier G de Montety C Samuel A Louis-Dreyfus L Tesio, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 51 57 10.1053/apmr.2003.50062 12589620
36. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. PW Halligan JC Marshall DT Wade, Lancet 1989 2 908 911 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91561- 4 2571823
37. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. JF Ditunno Jr W Young WH Donovan G Creasey, Paraplegia 1994 32 70 80 8015848
38. Increased reliability for single-case research results: is the bootstrap the answer? RI Parker, Behav Ther 2006 37 326 338 10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.007 17071211
39. Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke. BT Volpe D Lynch A Rykman-Berland M Ferraro M Galgano N Hogan HI Krebs, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 305 310 10.1177/1545968307311102 18184932
40. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. HI Krebs S Mernoff SE Fasoli R Hughes J Stein N Hogan, NeuroRehabilitation 2008 23 81 87 18356591
41. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation. HI Krebs BT Volpe D Williams J Celestino SK Charles D Lynch N Hogan, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 327 335 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903899 17894265
42. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. S Coote B Murphy W Harwin E Stokes, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 395 405 10.1177/0269215507085060 18441036
43. Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke. S McCombe Waller J Whitall, Clin Rehabil 2005 19 544 551 10.1191/0269215505cr829oa 16119411
44. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. J Liepert H Bauder HR Wolfgang WH Miltner E Taub C Weiller, Stroke 2000 31 1210 1216 10835434 (Pubitemid 30351235)
45. Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. JE Sullivan LD Hedman, Top Stroke Rehabil 2008 15 200 217 10.1310/tsr1503-200 18647725
46. Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. MC Cirstea A Ptito MF Levin, Exp Brain Res 2003 152 476 488 10.1007/s00221-003-1568-4 12928760
47. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. HI Krebs BT Volpe ML Aisen N Hogan, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 639 652 11321000
48. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. DJ Reinkensmeyer LE Kahn M Averbuch A McKenna-Cole BD Schmit WZ Rymer, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 653 662 11321001
49. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. S Hesse G Schulte-Tigges M Konrad A Bardeleben C Werner, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 915 920 10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04954-7 12808550
50. Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. RF Beer JP Dewald WZ Rymer, Exp Brain Res 2000 131 305 319 10.1007/s002219900275 10789946
51. Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. JP Dewald RF Beer, Muscle Nerve 2001 24 273 283 10.1002/1097-4598(200102)24:2<273::AID-MUS130>3.0.CO;2-Z 11180211
52. Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. MD Ellis BG Holubar AM Acosta RF Beer JP Dewald, Muscle Nerve 2005 32 170 178 10.1002/mus.20343 15880629
53. Source of work area reduction following hemiparetic stroke and preliminary intervention using the ACT3D system. TM Sukal MD Ellis JP Dewald, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006 1 177 180 full-text 17946798
54. Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke. J Mehrholz T Platz J Kugler M Pohl, Stroke 2009 40 392 393 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.536219