Robot-assisted therapy for neuromuscular training of sub-acute stroke patients. A feasibility study

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 431-435

  Treger, I ^a,b   Faran, S ^c   Ring, H ^a,b  

^a LOEWENSTEIN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Paresis; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 59649122207     PISSN: 19739087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: A pilot study.NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:81-7.
2. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Rybski C, Puzich U, Bardeleben A. A new mechanical arm trainer to intensify the upper limb rehabilitation of severely affected patients after stroke: design, concept and first case series. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:463-8.
3. Hogan N. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:639-52.
4. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:705-10.
5. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1106-11.
6. Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP, Newbery MJ, Makiyama A, Sandmann M et al. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-MANUS. Neuroengineering Rehabil 2004;1:5-9, 2004
7. Hogan N, Krebs HI. Interactive robots for neuro-rehabilitation. Res Neurol Neurosi 2004;22:349-58.
8. Masiero S, Celia A, Armani M, Rosati G. A novel robot device in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiplegic upper limbs. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:531-5.
9. Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T et al.Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Sep 2006; 14:378-89.
10. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;3:232-40.
11. Michimata A, Kondo T, Suzukamo Y, Chiba M, Izumi S. The manual function test: norms for 20- to 90-year-olds and effects of age,gender, and hand dominance on dexterity. Tohoku J Exp Med 2008;214:257-67.
12. Masiero S, Celia A, Armani M, Rosati G, Tavolato B, Ferraro C et al. Robot-aided intensive training in post-stroke recovery. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:261-5.
13. Liebermann DG, Buchman AS, Franks IM. Enhancement of motor rehabilitation through the use of information technologies. Clin Biomech 2006;21:8-20.
14. Voelker R. Rehabilitation medicine welcomes a robotic revolution. AMA 2005;294(10):1191-5.
15. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau ML. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke 2005;36:1960-6.