Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Reinkensmeyer, David J ^a   Boninger, Michael L ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; EDITORIAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; HUMAN; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; ROBOTICS;

COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; HUMANS; MOTION THERAPY, CONTINUOUS PASSIVE; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; ROBOTICS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84859032820     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-17     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC, Top Stroke Rehabil 2007 14 22 44 10.1310/tsr1406-22 18174114 (Pubitemid 350156151)
2. Potential for new technologies in clinical practice. Burridge JH, Hughes AM, Curr Opin Neurol 2010 23 671 677 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283402af5 20962639
3. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS, NeuroRehabilitation 2009 25 29 44 19713617
4. Machines to support motor rehabilitation after stroke: 10 years of experience in Berlin. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 671 678 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0052 17123207 (Pubitemid 44759903)
5. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Burke JW, McNeill MDJ, Charles DK, Morrow PJ, Crosbie JH, McDonough SM, Vis Comput 2009 25 1085 1099 10.1007/s00371-009-0387-4
6. Long-term therapeutic and orthotic effects of a foot drop stimulator on walking performance in progressive and nonprogressive neurological disorders. Stein RB, Everaert DG, Thompson AK, Chong SL, Whittaker M, Robertson J, Kuether G, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 152 167 10.1177/1545968309347681 19846759
7. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Exp Brain Res 2006 168 368 383 10.1007/s00221-005-0097-8 16249912 (Pubitemid 41830946)
8. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, et al. N Engl J Med 2010 362 1772 1783 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 20400552
9. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002 16 232 240 10.1177/154596802401105171 12234086 (Pubitemid 34984898)
10. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N, J Neurosci 2002 22 8297 8304 12223584 (Pubitemid 35379135)
11. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR, Stroke 2008 39 1786 1792 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779 18467648
12. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG, Phys Ther 2006 86 1466 1478 10.2522/ptj.20050266 17079746 (Pubitemid 44672536)
13. Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. Emken JL, Benitez R, Sideris A, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neurophysiol 2007 97 3997 4006 10.1152/jn.01095.2006 17392418 (Pubitemid 47082400)
14. Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning. Cai LL, Fong AJ, Otoshi CK, Liang Y, Burdick JW, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, J Neurosci 2006 26 10564 10568 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2266-06.2006 17035542 (Pubitemid 44564608)
15. Allowing intralimb kinematic variability during locomotor training poststroke improves kinematic consistency: a subgroup analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Lewek MD, Cruz TH, Moore JL, Roth HR, Dhaher YY, Hornby TG, Phys Ther 2010 89 829 839
16. Why variability facilitates spinal learning. Ziegler MD, Zhong H, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, J Neurosci 2010 30 10720 10726 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1938-10.2010 20702702
17. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 505 514 10.1177/1545968308331148 19237734
18. "If I can't do it once, why do it a hundred times?": connecting volition to movement success in a virtual environment motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Housman SJ, Proc Virtual Rehab Conference 2007 2007 44 48
19. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau ML, Stroke 2005 36 1960 1966 (Epub 2005 Aug 1918) 10.1161/01.STR.0000177865.37334.ce 16109908 (Pubitemid 41266534)
20. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S, Stroke 2002 33 2895 2901 10.1161/01.STR.0000035734.61539.F6 12468788 (Pubitemid 35462863)
21. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 560 569 18198714 (Pubitemid 350274177)
22. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, Armani M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 142 149 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 17270510 (Pubitemid 46161321)
23. HandCARE: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. Dovat L, Lambercy O, Gassert R, Maeder T, Milner T, Leong TC, Burdet E, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008 16 582 591 19144590
24. Freebal: dedicated gravity compensation for the upper extremities. Stienen AHA, Hekman EEG, Van der Helm FCT, Prange GB, Jannink MJA, Aalsma AMM, Van der Kooij H, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2007 2007 804 808
25. Home stroke rehabilitation for the upper limbs. Willmann RD, Lanfermann G, Saini P, Timmermans A, te Vrugt J, Winter S, Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007 2007 4015 4018
26. SHIMMER-A wireless sensor platform for noninvasive biomedical research. Burns A, Greene BR, McGrath MJ, O'Shea TJ, Kuris B, Ayer SM, Stroiescu F, Cionca V, IEEE Sens J 2010 10 1527 1534
27. ARMin III-Arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation. Nef T, Guidali M, Riener R, Appl Bion Biomech 2009 6 127 142 10.1080/11762320902840179
28. Robotic assisted rehabilitation in virtual reality with the L-EXOS. Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Carboncini MC, Rossi B, Stud Health Technol Inform 2009 145 40 54 19592785
29. A methodology to quantify alterations in human upper limb movement during co-manipulation with an exoskeleton. Jarrasse N, Tagliabue M, Robertson JVG, Maiza A, Crocher V, Roby-Brami A, Morel G, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 2010 18 389 397
30. A methodology to design kinematics of fixations between an orthosis and a human member. Jarrasse N, Morel G, IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics 2009 2009 958 1963
31. Self-aligning exoskeleton axes through decoupling of joint rotations and translations. Stienen A, Hekman E, van der Helm F, van der Kooij H, IEEE T Robot 2009 25 3 628 633
32. Robotic walking simulator for neurological gait rehabilitation. Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R, Proceedings of the Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conference 2002 3 2356 2357
33. HapticWalker - a novel haptic foot device. Schmidt H, Hesse S, Bernhardt R, Kruger J, ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 2005 2 166 180 10.1145/1060581.1060589
34. STRING-MAN: Wire-robot technology for safe, flexible and human-friendly gait rehabilitation. Surdilovic D, Zhang J, Bernhardt R, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2007 2007 446 453
35. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EE, Ekkelenkamp R, Van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 379 386 17894270 (Pubitemid 47460425)
36. The WalkTrainer - a new generation of walking reeducation device combining orthoses and muscle stimulation. Stauffer Y, Allemand Y, Bouri M, Fournier J, Clavel R, Metrailler P, Brodard R, Reynard F, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009 17 38 45 19211322
37. Patients' perceptions of the benefits and problems of using the ActiGait implanted drop-foot stimulator. Burridge JH, Haugland M, Larsen B, Svaneborg N, Iversen HK, Christensen PB, Pickering RM, Sinkjaer T, J Rehabil Med 2008 40 873 875 19242627
38. Biologically based design of an actuator system for a knee-ankle-foot orthosis. Cullell A, Moreno JC, Rocon E, Forner-Cordero A, Pons JL, Mechanism and Machine Theory 2009 44 4 860 872 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.04.001
39. Immediate effects of a controllable knee ankle foot orthosis for functional compensation of gait in patients with proximal leg weakness. Moreno JC, Brunetti F, Rocon E, Pons JL, Med Biol Eng Comput 2008 46 43 53 10.1007/s11517-007-0267-x 17926076
40. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. Riener R, Lunenburger L, Jezernik S, Anderschitz M, Colombo G, Dietz V, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 380 394 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848628 16200761 (Pubitemid 41416018)
41. Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training. Duschau-Wicke A, Caprez A, Riener R, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010 10 43
42. Path Control a strategy for patient-cooperative training of gait timing. Proc 7th Automed. Duschau-Wicke A, von Zitzewitz J, Wellner M, Koenig A, Lunenburger L, Riener R, Workshop Munich 2007 2007 1 2
43. Hiding robot inertia using resonance. Vallery H, Duschau-Wicke A, Riener R, Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010 1 1271 1274
44. Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements. Vergaro E, Casadio M, Squeri V, Giannoni P, Morasso P, Sanguineti V, J Neuroeng Rehab 2010 15 13
45. Virtual gait training for children with cerebral palsy using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Koenig A, Wellner M, Koneke S, Meyer-Heim A, Lunenburger L, Riener R, Stud Health Technol Inform 2008 132 204 209 18391287
46. MIMICS: Multimodal immersive motion rehabilitation of upper and lower extremities by exploiting biocooperation principles. Munih M, Riener R, Colombo G, Lunenburger L, Muller F, Slater M, Mihelj M, IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2009 2009 127 132
47. Congruent motor activity on electrocorticographic recordings during overt and observed hand movements. Collinger JL, Wang W, Vinjamuri R, Degenhart AD, Sudre GP, Boninger ML, Tyler-Kabara EC, Weber DJ, Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011 2011 in review
48. Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, Soekadar SR, Caria A, Birbaumer N, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 674 679 10.1177/1545968310368683 20519741
49. Feasibility of a new application of noninvasive Brain Computer Interface (BCI): a case study of training for recovery of volitional motor control after stroke. Daly JJ, Cheng R, Rogers J, Litinas K, Hrovat K, Dohring M, J Neurol Phys Ther 2009 33 203 211 20208465
50. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Courtine G, Gerasimenko Y, van den Brand R, Yew A, Musienko P, Zhong H, Song B, Ao Y, Ichiyama RM, Lavrov I, Roy RR, Sofroniew MV, Edgerton VR, Nat Neurosci 2009 12 333 342 10.1038/nn.2261 19198605
51. Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke. Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 559 568 10.1177/1545968308328718 19190087
52. How to retrain movement after neurologic injury: a computational rationale for incorporating robot (or therapist) assistance. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2003 2003 1479 1482
53. Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold. Han CE, Arbib MA, Schweighofer N, PLoS Comput Biol 2008 4 1000133 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000133 18769588
54. A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial. Schweighofer N, Han CE, Wolf SL, Arbib MA, Winstein CJ, Phys Ther 2009 89 1327 1336 10.2522/ptj.20080402 19797304
55. Do robotic and non-robotic arm movement training drive motor recovery after stroke by a common neural mechanism? experimental evidence and a computational model. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Maier MA, Guigon E, Chan V, Akoner OM, Wolbrecht ET, Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009 2009 2439 2441 19965205
56. A computational model of use-dependent motor recovery following stroke: optimizing corticospinal activations via reinforcement learning can explain residual capacity and other strength recovery dynamics. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Guigon E, Maier MA, Neural Networks 2012 29-30 60 69
57. CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm. Franklin DW, Burdet E, Tee KP, Osu R, Chew CM, Milner TE, Kawato M, J Neurosci 2008 28 11165 11173 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-08.2008 18971459
58. Concurrent adaptation of force and impedance in the redundant muscle system. Tee KP, Franklin DW, Kawato M, Milner TE, Burdet E, Biol Cybern 2010 102 31 44 10.1007/s00422-009-0348-z 19936778
59. The emerging relationship between regenerative medicine and physical therapeutics. Ambrosio F, Wolf SL, Delitto A, Fitzgerald GK, Badylak SF, Boninger ML, Russell AJ, Phys Ther 2010 90 1807 1814 10.2522/ptj.20100030 21030663
60. Be careful what you train for. Tetzlaff W, Fouad K, Kwon B, Nat Neurosci 2009 12 1077 1079 10.1038/nn0909-1077 19710644
61. Damage control in the nervous system: rehabilitation in a plastic environment. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Nat Med 2009 15 735 736 10.1038/nm0709-735 19584862
62. Chondroitinase ABC treatment opens a window of opportunity for task-specific rehabilitation. García-Alías G, Barkhuysen S, Buckle M, Fawcett JW, Nat Neurosci 2009 12 1145 1151 10.1038/nn.2377 19668200
63. Paw and limb use in skilled and spontaneous reaching after pyramidal tract, red nucleus and combined lesions in the rat: behavioral and anatomical dissociations. Whishaw IQ, Gorny B, Sarna J, Behav Brain Res 1998 93 167 183 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00152-6 9659998 (Pubitemid 28289435)
64. Training-induced plasticity in rats with cervical spinal cord injury: Effects and side effects. Krajacic A, Weishaupt N, Girgis J, Tetzlaff W, Fouad K, Behav Brain Res 2010 214 323 331 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.053 20573587
65. Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery. Girgis J, Merrett D, Kirkland S, Metz GA, Verge V, Fouad K, Brain 2007 130 2993 3003 10.1093/brain/awm245 17928316 (Pubitemid 350033978)
66. Differential effects of anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment and treadmill training in rats with incomplete spinal cord injury. Maier IC, Ichiyama RM, Courtine G, Schnell L, Lavrov I, Edgerton VR, Schwab ME, Brain 2009 132 1426 1440 10.1093/brain/awp085 19372269
67. Combination of NEP 1-40 treatment and motor training enhances behavioral recovery after a focal cortical infarct in rats. Fang PC, Barbay S, Plautz EJ, Hoover E, Strittmatter SM, Nudo RJ, Stroke 2010 41 544 549 10.1161/STROKEAHA. 109.572073 20075346
68. Nogo receptor deletion and multimodal exercise improve distinct aspects of recovery in cervical spinal cord injury. Harel NY, Song KH, Tang X, Strittmatter SM, J Neurotrauma 2010 27 2055 2066 10.1089/neu.2010.1491 20809785