A comparison between electromyography-driven robot and passive motion device on wrist rehabilitation for chronic stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 837-846

  Hu, Xiao Ling ^a   Tong, Kai Yu ^a   Song, Rong ^a   Zheng, Xiu Juan ^a   Leung, Wallace W F ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Robot; Stroke; Wrist

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELBOW; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; ROBOTICS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SPASTICITY; STROKE; TRAINING; WRIST;

ALGORITHMS; CHRONIC DISEASE; ELBOW JOINT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SHOULDER JOINT; STROKE; WRIST JOINT;

EID: 70349296958     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968309338191     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Song R., Tong KY, Hu XL, Li L. Assistive control system using continuous myoelectric signal in robot-aided arm training for patients after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008 ; 16: 371-379.
2. Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 ; 87: 1298-1304.
3. Ng MFW, Tong RKY, Li LSW. A pilot study of randomized clinical controlled trial of gait training in subacute stroke patients with partial body-weight support electromechanical gait trainer and functional electrical stimulation: six-month follow-up. Stroke. 2008 ; 39: 154-160.
4. Volpe BT, Ferraro M., Lynch D., et al. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004 ; 6: 314-319.
5. Hesse S., Schulte-Tigges G., Konrad M., Bardeleben A., Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 ; 84: 915-919.
6. Hesse S., Werner C., Pohl M., Rueckriem S., Mehrholz J., Lingnau ML Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke. 2005 ; 36: 1960-1966.
7. Weiller C., Juptner M., Fellows S., et al. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage. 1996 ; 4: 105-110.
8. Tong KY, Hu XL Service Robotics: Robot-Assisted Training for Stroke Rehabilitation. Vienna, Austria: I-Tech Education ; 2008.
9. Hu X., Tong KY, Song R., Tsang VS, Leung PO, Li L. Variation of muscle coactivation patterns in chronic stroke during robot-assisted elbow training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88: 1022-1029.
10. Hu XL, Tong KY, Song R., et al. Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training [published online ahead of print May 17, 2008]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.04.002.
11. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L., Leyman I., Olsson S., Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975 ; 7: 13-31.
12. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987 ; 1: 6-18.
13. Ashworth B. Preliminary trials of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner. 1964 ; 192: 540-542.
14. Colombo R., Pisano F., Micera S., et al. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 ; 13: 311-323.
15. Volpe B., Lynch D., Rykman-Berland A., et al. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 305-310.
16. Hidler J., Nichols D., Pelliccio M., et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 5-13.
17. Carroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. J Chronic Dis. 1965 ; 18: 479-491.
18. Computer Sports Medicine, Inc. Humac Norm Testing & Rehabilitation System: User's Guide Model 770. Stoughton, MA: Computer Sports Medicine, Inc ; 2005.
19. Frost G., Dowling J., Dyson K., Bar-Or O. Cocontraction in three age groups of children during treadmill locomotion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997 ; 7: 179-186.
20. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB, Duley A. Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming. Neurosci Lett. 2005 ; 382: 39-44.
21. Krebs H., Volpe B., Williams D., et al. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 ; 15: 327-335.
22. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 ; 87: 962-966.
23. Flament D., Shapiro MB, Kempf T., Corcos DM Time course and temporal order of changes in movement kinematics during learning of fast and accurate elbow flexions. Exp Brain Res. 1999 ; 129: 441-450.
24. Georgopoulos AP On reaching. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1986 ; 9: 147-170.
25. Dewald JPA, Sheshadri V., Dawson ML, Beer RF Upper-limb discoordination in hemiparetic stroke: implications for neurorehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001 ; 8: 1-12.