e100 NeuroRobotic system

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 15-19

  Stein, Joel ^a,b  

^a Department of Neurology and the Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromyography; Robotics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVICE; DEVICE THERAPY; ELBOW; ELECTROMYOGRAM; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ORTHOSIS; PILOT STUDY; REHABILITATION CARE; ROBOTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; INSTRUMENTATION; MARKETING; NEUROBIOLOGY;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; MARKETING; NEUROBIOLOGY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 63449138526     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.6.1.15     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2007 update. Circulation 115, E69-E171 (2007).
2. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31, 1210-1216 (2000).
3. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296, 2095-2104 (2006).
4. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI et al. Submovements grow fewer, larger, and more blended during stroke recovery. Motor Control 8(4), 472-483 (2004).
5. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 952-959 (2002).
6. Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA. Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 21, 207-215 (2007).
7. Sugar TG, He J, Koeneman EJ et al. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15, 336-346 (2007).
8. Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 570-575 (1998).
9. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 14, 22-44 (2007).
10. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 22, 111-121 (2008).
11. Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke 39, 1520-1525 (2008).
12. Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16, 286-297 (2008).
13. Stein J, Narendran K, McBean J, Krebs K, Hughes R. EMG-controlled exoskeletal upper limb powered orthosis for exercise training post-stroke. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 255-261 (2007).
14. Aisen FL, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch. Neurol. 54, 443-446 (1997).
15. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 477-482 (2003).
16. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke 37, 2115-2122 (2006).
17. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 25, 123-129 (2007).