Visual feedback distortion in a robotic environment for hand rehabilitation

Brain Research Bulletin

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 804-813

  Brewer, Bambi Roberts ^a   Klatzky, Roberta ^a   Matsuoka, Yoky ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hand rehabilitation; Robotic rehabilitation; Visual distortion; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FORCE; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN INJURIES; FEEDBACK; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 41249093049     PISSN: 03619230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Atkinson J.W. An Introduction to Motivation (1964), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York
2. Bandura A., and Cervone D. Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 38 (1986) 92-113
3. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 57 (1995) 289-300
4. Berliner J.E., and Durlach N.I. Intensity perception. IV. Resolution in roving-level discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 53 (1973) 1270-1287
5. Boian R., Sharma A., Han C., Merians A., Burdea G., Adamovich S., Recce M., Tremaine M., and Poizner H. Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 85 (2002) 64-70
6. Brewer B.R., Fagan M., Klatzky R., and Matsuoka Y. Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13 (2005) 1-11
7. Brewer B.R., Klatzky R., and Matsuoka Y. Visual-feedback distortion in a robotic rehabilitation environment. Proc. IEEE 94 9 (2006) 1739-1751
8. Brewer B.R., Klatzky R., and Matsuoka Y. Initial therapeutic results of visual feedback manipulation in robotic rehabilitation. Fifth International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. August (2006)
9. Brodie E.E., and Ross H.E. Sensorimotor mechanisms in weight discrimination. Percept. Psychophys. 36 (1984) 477-481
10. Burgar C.G., Lum P.S., Shor P.C., and Machiel Van der Loos H.F. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37 (2000) 663-673
11. Cole K. Grasp force control in older adults. J. Motor Behav. 23 (1991) 251-258
12. Durlach N.I., Delhorne L.A., Wong A., Ko W.Y., Rabinowitz W.M., and Hollerbach J. Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method. Percept. Psychophys. 46 (1989) 29-38
13. Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (2002) 429-433
14. Fitzgibbons P.J., and Gordon-Salant S. Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 2955-2963
15. Gescheider G.A. Psychophysics: Method and Theory (1976), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ
16. Hermsdorfer J., Hagl E., Nowak D.A., and Marquardt C. Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 (2003) 915-929
17. Jaric S., Corcos D.M., Gottlieb G.L., Ilic D.B., and Latash M.L. The effects of practice on movement distance and final position reproduction: implications for the equilibrium-point control of movements. Exp. Brain Res. 100 (1994) 353-359
18. Jones L.A. Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds. Perception 18 (1989) 681-687
19. Kim J.S., and Choi-Kwon S. Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. Stroke 27 (1996) 677-682
20. Kopp B., Kunkel A., Flor H., Platz T., Rose U., Mauritz K.H., Gresser K., McCulloch K.L., and Taub E. The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78 (1997) 615-620
21. Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Aisen M.L., and Volpe B.T. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6 (1998) 75-87
22. Krebs H.I., Volpe B.T., Aisen M.L., and Hogan N. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37 (2000) 639-652
23. Pang X.D., Tan H.Z., and Durlach N.I. Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion. Percept. Psychophys. 49 (1991) 531-540
24. Patton J.L., Stoykov M.E., Kovic M., and Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp. Brain Res. 168 (2006) 368-383
25. Raj D.V., Ingty K., and Devanandan M.S. Weight appreciation in the hand in normal subjects and in patients with leprous neuropathy. Brain 108 Pt 1 (1985) 95-102
26. Rock I., and Victor J. Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143 (1964) 594-596
27. Ross H.E., and Brodie E.E. Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 39 (1987) 77-88
28. Shimokata H., and Kuzuya F. Two-point discrimination test of the skin as an index of sensory aging. Gerontology 41 (1995) 267-272
29. Shinomori K., Schefrin B.E., and Werner J.S. Age-related changes in wavelength discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 18 (2001) 310-318
30. Srinivasan M.A., Beauregard G.L., and Brock D.L. The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. Presented at ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (1996) 555-559
31. Stevens J.C., and Patterson M.Q. Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span. Somatosens. Motor Res. 12 (1995) 29-47
32. Tan H.Z., Durlach N.I., Beauregard G.L., and Srinivasan M.A. Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues. Percept. Psychophys. 57 (1995) 495-510
33. Tan H.Z., Rabinowitz W.M., and Durlach N.I. Analysis of a synthetic Tadoma system as a multidimensional tactile display. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86 (1989) 981-988
34. Taub E. Overcoming learned nonuse: a new approach to treatment in physical medicine. In: Carlson J.G., Seifert A.R., and Birbaumer N. (Eds). Clinical Applied Psychophysiology (1994), Plenum Press, New York 185-220
35. E. Taub, J.E. Crago, K.L. McCulloch, Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT)-Manual, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
36. Vande Weghe M., Dellon B., Kelly S., Juchniewicz R., and Matsuoka Y. Demonstration of a large dissipative haptic environment. IEEE Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual and Teleoperator Systems (2006)
37. van der Lee J.H., Beckerman H., Lankhorst G.J., and Bouter L.M. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J. Rehabil. Med. 33 (2001) 110-113
38. Van der Lee J.H., De Groot V., Beckerman H., Wagenaar R.C., Lankhorst G.J., and Bouter L.M. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82 (2001) 14-19
39. Welch R.B., and Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol. Bull. 88 (1980) 638-667