Upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: ARAMIS a robo-mechatronic innovative approach and prototype

Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1410-1414

  Pignolo, L ^a   Dolce, G ^a   Basta, G ^b   Lucca, L F ^c   Serra, S ^c   Sannita, W G ^d  

^a RAN Research in Adavanced NeuroRehabilitation   (Italy)

^b S Anna Institute for Neurorehabilitation and RAN Research in Adavanced NeuroRehabilitation   (Italy)

^c S Anna Institute for NeuroRehabilitation   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC RECOVERY; EXOSKELETON ROBOTS; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS; UPPER LIMBS; UPPER-LIMB REHABILITATION;

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EID: 84867435737     PISSN: 21551774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290868     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. (Stroke Review ) Truelsen T, Bonita R Stroke in developing Countries: a continuing challenge. 2003;7(3):61-66.
2. (Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation) Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, , Teasell R: Plasticity and reorganization of the uninjured brain. (2005, 12(3):1-10).
3. (Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Clinics of North America) Nudo RJ. Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery.. 2003, 14:57-76.
4. (J Rehab Res Dev) Prange GB et Al. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. 2006, 43:171.
5. (Current Neurol Neuroscie Reports) Volpe BT et Al. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patient recovering from stroke. 2002, 5(6) 465-70.
6. (Top Stroke Rehab) Lum P et Al Robotic Devices for movement therapy after stroke: Current and challenges to clinical acceptance. 2002, 8:40-53.
7. (Arch Physical Med Rehab) Fasoli SE et Al. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. 2003,84(4):477 82.
8. (Autonomous Robots) Loureiro R et al. Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy-GENTLE/s approach. 2003, 15(1): 35-51.
9. (Top Stroke Rehabil) Hidler J et Al. Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. 2005, 12:22-35.
10. (Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) Colizzi L, Lidonnici A, Pignolo L: The ARAMIS project: A concept robot and technical design.. 2009, 41:1011-1015.
11. (Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) Dolce G, Lucca LF, Pignolo L: Robot-assisted rehabilitation of the paretic upper limb: Rationale of the ARAMIS project.. 2009, 41:1007-1010
12. (Annual Reviews of Neuroscience) Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror neuron system. 2004;27:169-192.
13. (Lancet) Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middlecerebral-artery stroke: a randomized trial. 1999;354:191-196.
14. (Exp Brain Res.) Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. 2004; 157:162-173
15. (Progress in Neurobiology) Schaechter JD. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. 2004;73:61-72.
16. (Stroke.) Liepert J, Bauder H,Wolfgang H.. Miltner R, Taub E, Weiller C.Treatment-Induced Cortical Reorganization After Stroke in Humans. 2000;31:1210.
17. (Curr Opin Neurol) Krakauer J. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. 2006; 19: 84-90.
18. (Progress in Neurobiology) Will B, Galani R, Kelche C, Rosenzweig MR: Recovery from brain injury in animals: relative efficacy of environmental enrichment, physical exercise or formal training (1992-2002). 2004, 72(3) 167-182.
19. (Scand J Rehabil Med ) Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. 1975; 7: 13-31.
20. (Scand J Rehabil Med) Lindmark B, Hamrin E. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Validation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment. 1988; 20: 111-115.
21. (Am J Phys Med Rehabil) Tesio L, Granger CV, Perucca L, Franchignoni FP, Battaglia MA, Russel CF. The FIM instrument in the United States and Italy: a comparative study. 2002; 81: 168-176.
22. (Ricerca Riabil) Functional Indipendent Measure: versione italiana. Manuale d'uso [Functional Independent Measure: Italian version. Users manual]. 1992; Suppl 2: 1-44 (in Italian).
23. (Journal of Neuroengin and Rehab) Crespo LM, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. 2009; 6:20.
24. (Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine) Pignolo L: Robotics in neurorehabilitation.. 2009, 41:955-960.