Grounding cognitive control in associative learning

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 142, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 693-728

  Abrahamse, Elger ^a   Braem, Senne ^a   Notebaert, Wim ^a   Verguts, Tom ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attentional control; Cognitive control; Conflict adaptation; Response inhibition; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84975717652     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000047     Document Type: Article

References (337)

1. Aarts, K., De Houwer, J., & Pourtois, G. (2012). Evidence for the automatic evaluation of self-generated actions. Cognition, 124, 117-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.009
2. Abrahamse, E., & Braem, S. (2015). Experience a conflict-either consciously or not (commentary on Desender, Van Opstal, and Van den Bussche, 2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00179
3. Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., Notebaert, W., & Risko, E. F. (2013). Attention modulation by proportion congruency: The asymmetrical list shifting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1552-1562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032426
4. Akçay, C., & Hazeltine, E. (2008). Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 958-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.958
5. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2011). Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 505-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0084-y
6. Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1338-1344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2921
7. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting international set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Alvarez, P., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: A simple network model. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 7041-7045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.15.7041
9. Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13, 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/13.3.7
10. Anderson, B. A. (2015). Value-driven attentional priority is context specific. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 750-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0724-0
11. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2012). Contingent involuntary motoric inhibition: The involuntary inhibition of a motor response contingent on top-down goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1348-1352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030514
12. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2014). Conditional automaticity in response selection: Contingent involuntary response inhibition with varied stimulus-response mapping. Psychological Science, 25, 547-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613511086
13. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011a). Value-driven attentional capture. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10367-10371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104047108
14. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011b). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS ONE, 6, e27926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027926
15. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Generalization of value-based attentional priority. Visual Cognition, 20, 647-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012.679711
16. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Reward predictions bias attentional selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 262. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00262
17. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1644-1653. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2
18. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 6-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030860
19. Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J.,... Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501, 97-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12486
20. Ansorge, U., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S., & Kunde, W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychological Research, 75, 351-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0313-4
21. Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Worschech, F. (2010). Attentional capture by masked colour singletons. Vision Research, 50, 2015-2027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.015
22. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 648-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.648
23. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.762
24. Aron, A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry, 69, e55-e68.
25. Ásgeirsson, Á. G., & Kristjánsson, A. (2014). Random reward priming is task-contingent: The robustness of the 1-trial reward priming effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00309
26. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2011). Human category learning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 147-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05874.x
27. Ashby, F. G., Turner, B. O., & Horvitz, J. C. (2010). Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 208-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.001
28. Atalay, N. B., & Misirlisoy, M. (2012). Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within-and betweenlanguage ISPC effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1578-1590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028458
29. Atalay, N. B., & Misirlisoy, M. (2014). ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: A time course analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1410. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01410
30. Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
31. Baars, B. J. (1993). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32. Bauer, F., Cheadle, S. W., Parton, A., Müller, H. J., & Usher, M. (2009). Gamma flicker triggers attentional selection without awareness. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1666-1671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810496106
33. Beckers, T., Miller, R. R., De Houwer, J., & Urushihara, K. (2006). Reasoning rats: Forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 92-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.92
34. Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W., Walton, M. E., & Rushworth, M. F. (2007). Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1214-1221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1954
35. Belopolsky, A. V., Kramer, A. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2005). Prioritization by transients in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 93-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196352
36. Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2012). Post-stop-signal adjustments: Inhibition improves subsequent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 955-966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026778
37. Blais, C., Harris, M. B., Guerrero, J. V., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 268-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470211003775234
38. Blais, C., & Verguts, T. (2012). Increasing set size breaks down sequential congruency: Evidence for an associative locus of cognitive control. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 133-139.
39. Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006). Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1121872
40. Bodner, G. E., & Mulji, R. (2010). Prime proportion affects masked priming of fixed and free-choice responses. Experimental Psychology, 57, 360-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000043
41. Boehler, C. N., Hopf, J. M., Stoppel, C. M., & Krebs, R. M. (2012). Motivating inhibition-reward prospect speeds up response cancellation. Cognition, 125, 498-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.018
42. Boehler, C. N., Schevernels, H., Hopf, J. M., Stoppel, C. M., & Krebs, R. M. (2014). Reward prospect rapidly speeds up response inhibition via reactive control. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 593-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0251-5
43. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129, 387-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005
44. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
45. Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2014). The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiers. Cognitive Science, 38, 1249-1285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12126
46. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003
47. Braem, S., Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2014). What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1134. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134
48. Braem, S., Coenen, E., Bombeke, K., van Bochove, M. E., & Notebaert, W. (2015). Open your eyes for prediction errors. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 374-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0333-4
49. Braem, S., Hickey, C., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2014). Reward determines the context-sensitivity of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1769-1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037554
50. Braem, S., King, J. A., Korb, F. M., Krebs, R. M., Notebaert, W., & Egner, T. (2013). Affective modulation of cognitive control is determined by performance-contingency and mediated by ventromedial prefrontal and cingulate cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 16961-16970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1208-13.2013
51. Braem, S., Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2011). Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1662-1666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024385
52. Braem, S., Verguts, T., Roggeman, C., & Notebaert, W. (2012). Reward modulates adaptations to conflict. Cognition, 125, 324-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.015
53. Braver, T. S., & Barch, D. M. (2002). A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 809-817.
54. Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 713-737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Bryden, D. W., Johnson, E. E., Tobia, S. C., Kashtelyan, V., & Roesch, M. R. (2011). Attention for learning signals in anterior cingulate cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 18266-18274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4715-11.2011
56. Bucker, B., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Distractors that signal reward attract the eyes. Visual Cognition, 23, 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.980483
57. Bucker, B., Silvis, J. D., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Reward modulates oculomotor competition between differently valued stimuli. Vision Research, 108, 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.020
58. Bugg, J. M. (2012). Dissociating levels of cognitive control: The case of Stroop interference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 302-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453586
59. Bugg, J. M., & Chanani, S. (2011). List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from picture-word Stroop. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 930-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0112-y
60. Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 367. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
61. Bugg, J. M., & Hutchison, K. A. (2013). Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 433-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029145
62. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Chanani, S. (2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 844-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019957
63. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1484-1494. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1484
64. Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A., Scullin, M. K., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1595-1606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024670
65. Cañadas, E., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Social categories as a context for the allocation of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 934-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029794
66. Chelazzi, L., Eštočinová, J., Calletti, R., Lo Gerfo, E., Sani, I., Della Libera, C., & Santandrea, E. (2014). Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 8594-8604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-14.2014
67. Cheng, S. (2013). The CRISP theory of hippocampal function in episodic memory. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 7, 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2013.00088
68. Chetverikov, A., Jóhannesson, Ó. I., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2015). Blaming the victims of your own mistakes: How visual search accuracy influences evaluation of stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 1091-1106.
69. Chiu, Y. C., & Aron, A. R. (2014). Unconsciously triggered response inhibition requires an executive setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 56-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031497
70. Cho, R. Y., Orr, J. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2009). Generalized signaling for control: Evidence from postconflict and posterror performance adjustments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1161-1177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014491
71. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
72. Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., & Yu, A. J. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 362, 933-942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
73. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
74. Cole, M. W., Laurent, P., & Stocco, A. (2013). Rapid instructed task learning: A new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0125-7
75. Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2013). Action video gaming and cognitive control: Playing first person shooter games is associated with improvement in working memory but not action inhibition. Psychological Research, 77, 234-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0415-2
76. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2013). Context-dependent control over attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 836-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030027
77. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2013). Learned control over distraction is disrupted in amnesia. Psychological Science, 24, 1585-1590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613475632
78. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034489
79. Crump, M. J., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193850
80. Crump, M. J., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Contextual control over task-set retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2047-2053. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196681
81. Crump, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523-1532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210902752096
82. Crump, M. J., Vaquero, J. M., & Milliken, B. (2008). Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 22-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.004
83. Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2010). The unconscious will: How the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science, 329, 47-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1188595
84. D'Angelo, M. C., Jiménez, L., Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 69-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028474
85. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70, 200-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
86. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2
87. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science, 17, 222-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x
88. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20, 778-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x
89. Denkinger, B., & Koutstaal, W. (2009). Perceive-decide-act, perceivedecide-act: How abstract is repetition-related decision learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 742-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015263
90. den Ouden, H. E., Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2012). How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 548. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00548
91. Desender, K., Van Lierde, E., & Van den Bussche, E. (2013). Comparing conscious and unconscious conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 8, e55976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055976
92. Desender, K., Van Opstal, F., & Van den Bussche, E. (2014). Feeling the conflict: The crucial role of conflict experience in adaptation. Psychological Science, 25, 675-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613511468
93. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196171
94. Doll, B. B., Jacobs, W. J., Sanfey, A. G., & Frank, M. J. (2009). Instructional control of reinforcement learning: A behavioral and neurocomputational investigation. Brain Research, 1299, 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.007
95. Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). The role of affect and reward in the conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 342. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00342
96. Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001
97. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
98. Egner, T. (2014). Creatures of habit (and control): A multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1247.
99. Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage, 35, 940-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.061
100. Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2010). Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 951-962. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.951
101. Enge, S., Behnke, A., Fleischhauer, M., Küttler, L., Kliegel, M., & Strobel, A. (2014). No evidence for true training and transfer effects after inhibitory control training in young healthy adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 987-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036165
102. Entel, O., Tzelgov, J., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2014). Proportion congruency effects: Instructions may be enough. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01108
103. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
104. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
105. Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C., & Thorpe, S. (2001). A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 171-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892901564234
106. Failing, M. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision, 14, 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.5.6
107. Farooqui, A. A., & Manly, T. (2015). Anticipatory control through associative learning of subliminal relations: Invisible may be better than visible. Psychological Science, 26, 325-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614564191
108. Feldman, J. L., Clark, S. L., & Freitas, A. L. (2015). Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control. Biological Psychology, 109, 132-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.05.001
109. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Knight, M. (2008). Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 340-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.340
110. Fischer, R., Gottschalk, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 399-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034310
111. Fischer, R., Plessow, F., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2010). Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1576-1594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019326
112. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847
113. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (2006). Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 14, 445-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280500193545
114. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16, 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280701458804
115. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
116. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wu, S. C. (2009). Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 308-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.2.308
117. Forrest, C. L., Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. P. (2014). Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1002-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035981
118. Forster, S. E., & Cho, R. Y. (2014). Context specificity of post-error and post-conflict cognitive control adjustments. PLoS ONE, 9, e90281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090281
119. Francken, J. C., Gaal, S., & de Lange, F. P. (2011). Immediate and long-term priming effects are independent of prime awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1793-1800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.005
120. Franconeri, S. L., Simons, D. J., & Junge, J. A. (2004). Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 876-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196715
121. Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18, 1040-1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02022.x
122. Freitas, A. L., & Clark, S. L. (2015). Generality and specificity in cognitive control: Conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks. Psychological Research, 79, 143-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0540-1
123. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
124. Fuchs, I., & Ansorge, U. (2012). Unconscious cueing via the superior colliculi: Evidence from searching for onset and color targets. Brain Sciences, 2, 33-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci2010033
125. Fuchs, I., Theeuwes, J., & Ansorge, U. (2013). Exogenous attentional capture by subliminal abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from contrastpolarity independent cueing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 974-988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030419
126. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010a). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 147-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017598
127. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010b). Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition, 114, 338-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.007
128. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Cue-task associations in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 762-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701268005
129. Gaschler, R., Frensch, P. A., Cohen, A., & Wenke, D. (2012). Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1389-1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028071
130. Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 809-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.834372
131. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 331-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
132. Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2007). Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: Response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 394-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.394
133. Goschy, H., Bakos, S., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2014). Probability cueing of distractor locations: Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1195. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195
134. Gough, A., Garcia, J., Torres-Quesada, M., & Milliken, B. (2014). Control of spatial orienting: Context-specific proportion cued effects in an exogenous spatial cueing task. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 220-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.014
135. Green, C. S., Sugarman, M. A., Medford, K., Klobusicky, E., & Bavelier, D. (2012). The effect of action video game experience on task-switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 984-994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.020
136. Hasegawa, K., & Takahashi, S. (2014). The role of visual awareness for conflict adaptation in the masked priming task: Comparing block-wise adaptation with trial-by-trial adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1347. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01347
137. Hazeltine, E., Lightman, E., Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2011). The boundaries of sequential modulations: Evidence for set-level control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1898-1914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024662
138. Hazeltine, E., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2014). Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1327. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01327
139. Heinemann, A., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2009). Context-specific primecongruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 966-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.009
140. Held, B., Ansorge, U., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Masked singleton effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2069-2086. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196684
141. Hepler, J., & Albarracin, D. (2013). Complete unconscious control: Using (in)action primes to demonstrate completely unconscious activation of inhibitory control mechanisms. Cognition, 128, 271-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.012
142. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010a). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096-11103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
143. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010b). Reward guides vision when it's your thing: Trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming. PLoS ONE, 5, e14087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014087
144. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Reward has a residual impact on target selection in visual search, but not on the suppression of distractors. Visual Cognition, 19, 117-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2010.503946
145. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Reward-priming of location in visual search. PLoS ONE, 9, e103372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103372
146. Hickey, C., Kaiser, D., & Peelen, M. V. (2015). Reward guides attention to object categories in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 264-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038627
147. Hickey, C., & Peelen, M. V. (2015). Neural mechanisms of incentive salience in naturalistic human vision. Neuron, 85, 512-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.049
148. Hickey, C., & van Zoest, W. (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Current Biology, 22, R219-R220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007
149. Hickey, C., & van Zoest, W. (2013). Reward-associated stimuli capture the eyes in spite of strategic attentional set. Vision Research, 92, 67-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.008
150. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
151. Houben, K. (2011). Overcoming the urge to splurge: Influencing eating behavior by manipulating inhibitory control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 384-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.008
152. Houben, K., & Jansen, A. (2011). Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite, 56, 345-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.017
153. Hsieh, P. J., Colas, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Pop-out without awareness: Unseen feature singletons capture attention only when topdown attention is available. Psychological Science, 22, 1220-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419302
154. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195816
155. Huang, T. R., Hazy, T. E., Herd, S. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2013). Assembling old tricks for new tasks: A neural model of instructional learning and control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 843-851.
156. Hughes, G., Velmans, M., & De Fockert, J. (2009). Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology, 46, 1258-1269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x
157. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196526
158. Jensen, K., Kirsch, I., Odmalm, S., Kaptchuk, T. J., & Ingvar, M. (2015). Classical conditioning of analgesic and hyperalgesic pain responses without conscious awareness. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 7863-7867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504567112
159. Jiang, H., & Xu, B. (2014). Reward enhances backward inhibition in task switching. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 178-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.878717
160. Jiang, J., Bailey, K., Chen, A., Cui, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Unconsciously triggered emotional conflict by emotional facial expressions. PLoS ONE, 8, e55907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055907
161. Jiménez, L., Lupiáñez, J., & Vaquero, J. M. (2009). Sequential congruency effects in implicit sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 690-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.006
162. Jones, A., & Field, M. (2013). The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 8-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030683
163. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
164. Kan, I. P., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Drummey, A. B., Nutile, L., Krupa, L., & Novick, J. M. (2013). To adapt or not to adapt: The question of domain-general cognitive control. Cognition, 129, 637-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.001
165. Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009). How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Developmental Science, 12, 978-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00846.x
166. Karbach, J., Mang, S., & Kray, J. (2010). Transfer of task-switching training in older age: The role of verbal processes. Psychology and Aging, 25, 677-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019845
167. Katzir, M., Ori, B., Hsieh, S., & Meiran, N. (2015). Competitor rule priming: Evidence for priming of task rules in task switching. Psychological Research, 79, 446-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0583-3
168. Kelley, A. E. (2004). Memory and addiction: Shared neural circuitry and molecular mechanisms. Neuron, 44, 161-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.016
169. Kieffaber, P. D., Kruschke, J. K., Cho, R. Y., Walker, P. M., & Hetrick, W. P. (2013). Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 700-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029545
170. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194000
171. Kim, S., & Cho, Y. S. (2014). Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning. Acta Psychologica, 149, 60-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.004
172. King, J. A., Korb, F. M., & Egner, T. (2012). Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8192-8200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-12.2012
173. Kiss, M., Driver, J., & Eimer, M. (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20, 245-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02281.x
174. Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2011). Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals. Psychophysiology, 48, 784-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01145.x
175. Kleiman, T., Hassin, R. R., & Trope, Y. (2014). The control-freak mind: Stereotypical biases are eliminated following conflict-activated cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 498-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033047
176. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multidimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004260050060
177. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
178. Koch, I., Prinz, W., & Allport, A. (2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabetarithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research, 69, 252-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0180-y
179. Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task. Cognition, 117, 341-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.018
180. Kristjánsson, A., Sigurjónsdóttir, O., & Driver, J. (2010). Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1229-1236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1229
181. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196485
182. Kunde, W., Augst, S., & Kleinsorge, T. (2012). Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 644-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8
183. Kunde, W., Reuss, H., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Consciousness and cognitive control. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0097-x
184. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193413
185. Lamy, D., Alon, L., Carmel, T., & Shalev, N. (2015). The role of conscious perception in attentional capture and object-file updating. Psychological Science, 26, 48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614556777
186. Lau, H. C., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5805-5811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4335-06.2007
187. Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 365-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009
188. Laurent, P. A., Hall, M. G., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2015). Valuable orientations capture attention. Visual Cognition, 23, 133-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.965242
189. Leboe, J. P., Wong, J., Crump, M., & Stobbe, K. (2008). Probe-specific proportion task repetition effects on switching costs. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 935-945. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.935
190. Lee, J., & Cho, Y. S. (2013). Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: Evidence for dimension-specific modulation. Acta Psychologica, 144, 617-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.013
191. Lenartowicz, A., Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3388-3399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00031
192. Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T. (2015). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 158-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000037
193. Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
194. Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1325-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028148
195. Lin, J. Y., Murray, S. O., & Boynton, G. M. (2009). Capture of attention to threatening stimuli without perceptual awareness. Current Biology, 19, 1118-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.021
196. Lin, Z., & Murray, S. O. (2015). More power to the unconscious: Conscious, but not unconscious, exogenous attention requires location variation. Psychological Science, 26, 221-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614560770
197. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
198. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
199. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197535
200. MacLean, M., & Giesbrecht, B. (2014). Attention capture by taskirrelevant learned value interacts with task-relevant top-down factors. Journal of Vision, 14, 501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.501
201. MacLean, M. H., & Giesbrecht, B. (2015). Neural evidence reveals the rapid effects of reward history on selective attention. Brain Research, 1606, 86-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.016
202. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209251
203. Manly, T., Fish, J. E., Griffiths, S., Molenveld, M., Zhou, F. A., & Davis, G. J. (2014). Unconscious priming of task-switching generalizes to an untrained task. PLoS ONE, 9, e88416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088416
204. Marr, D. (1971). Simple memory: A theory for archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 262, 23-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0078
205. Mayr, U. (2004). Conflict, consciousness, and control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 145-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.006
206. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
207. Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2007). Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection. Psychological Research, 71, 107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0039-x
208. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
209. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
210. Mele, S., Savazzi, S., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (2008). Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: Is it related to inhibition of return? Neuropsychologia, 46, 810-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.003
211. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
212. Mine, C., & Saiki, J. (2015). Task-irrelevant stimulus-reward association induces value-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1896-1907. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0894-5
213. Minear, M., & Shah, P. (2008). Training and transfer effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1470-1483. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.336.8.1470
214. Mordkoff, J. T. (2012). Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 750-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0257-3
215. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15, 779-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280701307001
216. Munakata, Y., Herd, S. A., Chatham, C. H., Depue, B. E., Banich, M. T., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2011). A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 453-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.011
217. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
218. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
219. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071-1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
220. Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 601-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.009
221. Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Greaves, M. (2012). Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 779-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4
222. Oei, A. C., & Patterson, M. D. (2014). Playing a puzzle video game with changing requirements improves executive functions. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 216-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.046
223. O'Reilly, R. C. (2006). Biologically based computational models of highlevel cognition. Science, 314, 91-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1127242
224. O'Reilly, R. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1994). Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade-off. Hippocampus, 4, 661-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450040605
225. Panadero, A., Castellanos, M. C., & Tudela, P. (2015). Unconscious context-specific proportion congruency effect in a Stroop-like task. Consciousness and Cognition, 31, 35-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.016
226. Parkinson, J., & Haggard, P. (2014). Subliminal priming of intentional inhibition. Cognition, 130, 255-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.005
227. Pearson, D., Donkin, C., Tran, S. C., Most, S. B., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2015). Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Visual Cognition, 23, 41-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.994252
228. Pereg, M., Shahar, N., & Meiran, N. (2013). Task switching training effects are mediated by working-memory management. Intelligence, 41, 467-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.009
229. Perone, S., Molitor, S. J., Buss, A. T., Spencer, J. P., & Samuelson, L. K. (2015). Enhancing the executive functions of 3-year-olds in the Dimensional Change Card Sort task. Child Development, 86, 812-827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12330
230. Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S., & Sander, D. (2014). Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary rewards. Cognition, 130, 348-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.002
231. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
232. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. Rabbitt & F. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. V). New York, NY: Academic Press.
233. Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). The elusive link between language control and executive control: A case of limited transfer. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 622-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.821993
234. Qi, S., Zeng, Q., Ding, C., & Li, H. (2013). Neural correlates of rewarddriven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Research, 1532, 32-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.044
235. Ramamoorthy, A., & Verguts, T. (2012). Word and deed: A computational model of instruction following. Brain Research, 1439, 54-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.025
236. Rao, R. P., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4580
237. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
238. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations on the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
239. Reuss, H., Desender, K., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Unconscious conflicts in unconscious contexts: The role of awareness and timing in flexible conflict adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1701-1718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036437
240. Reuss, H., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hommel, B. (2011). Unconscious activation of task sets. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 556-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.014
241. Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951). A stochastic approximation method. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 400-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729586
242. Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1996). Neurobehavioural mechanisms of reward and motivation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 228-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80077-8
243. Roper, Z. J., Vecera, S. P., & Vaidya, J. G. (2014). Value-driven attentional capture in adolescence. Psychological Science, 25, 1987-1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614545654
244. Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1033-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000105
245. Rünger, D., Schwager, S., & Frensch, P. A. (2010). Across-task conflict regulation: A replication failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 136-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017172
246. Rutherford, H. J., O'Brien, J. L., & Raymond, J. E. (2010). Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 536-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.536
247. Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2014). The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1654-1664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037267
248. Schlaghecken, F., Refaat, M., & Maylor, E. A. (2011). Multiple systems for cognitive control: Evidence from a hybrid prime-Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1542-1553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024327
249. Schmidt, J. R. (2013a). The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 142, 119-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004
250. Schmidt, J. R. (2013b). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 615-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
251. Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 514-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
252. Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J., Cheesman, J., & Besner, D. (2007). Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 421-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.010
253. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Now you see it, now you don't: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002
254. Schmidt, J. R., & Weissman, D. H. (2014). Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds. PLoS ONE, 9, e102337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102337
255. Schneider, D. W. (2015). Isolating a mediated route for response congruency effects in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 235-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000049
256. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
257. Schoeberl, T., Fuchs, I., Theeuwes, J., & Ansorge, U. (2015). Stimulusdriven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 737-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0802-4
258. Schouppe, N., Braem, S., De Houwer, J., Silvetti, M., Verguts, T., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Notebaert, W. (2015). No pain, no gain: The affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0318-3
259. Schouppe, N., de Ferrerre, E., Van Opstal, F., Braem, S., & Notebaert, W. (2014). Conscious and unconscious context-specific cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 539. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00539
260. Schouppe, N., Demanet, J., Boehler, C. N., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Notebaert, W. (2014). The role of the striatum in effort-based decisionmaking in the absence of reward. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 2148-2154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1214-13.2014
261. Schouppe, N., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2014). Context-specific control and context selection in conflict tasks. Acta Psychologica, 146, 63-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.010
262. Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2010). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 672-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.672
263. Schultz, W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36, 241-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00967-4
264. Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 163-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.163
265. Seitz, A., & Watanabe, T. (2005). A unified model for perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 329-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.010
266. Sevenster, D., Beckers, T., & Kindt, M. (2013). Prediction error governs pharmacologically induced amnesia for learned fear. Science, 339, 830-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231357
267. Shahar, N., & Meiran, N. (2015). Learning to control actions: Transfer effects following a procedural cognitive control computerized training. PLoS ONE, 10, e0119992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119992
268. Shedden, J. M., Milliken, B., Watter, S., & Monteiro, S. (2013). Eventrelated potentials as brain correlates of item specific proportion congruent effects. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1442-1455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.002
269. Silvetti, M., Alexander, W., Verguts, T., & Brown, J. W. (2014). From conflict management to reward-based decision making: Actors and critics in primate medial frontal cortex. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 44-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.11.003
270. Silvetti, M., Seurinck, R., & Verguts, T. (2011). Value and prediction error in medial frontal cortex: Integrating the single-unit and systems levels of analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00075
271. Silvetti, S., & Verguts, T. (2012). Reinforcement learning, high-level cognition, and the human brain. In P. Bright (Ed.), Neuroimaging: Cognitive and clinical neuroscience (pp. 283-296). InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/23471
272. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0020586
273. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
274. Soutschek, A., Strobach, T., & Schubert, T. (2014). Motivational and cognitive determinants of control during conflict processing. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1076-1089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.870134
275. Spapé, M. M., Ahmed, I., Jacucci, G., & Ravaja, N. (2015). The self in conflict: Actors and agency in the mediated sequential Simon task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 304.
276. Spapé, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2008). He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1117-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1117
277. Spierer, L., Chavan, C. F., & Manuel, A. L. (2013). Training-induced behavioral and brain plasticity in inhibitory control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00427
278. Steinberg, E. E., Keiflin, R., Boivin, J. R., Witten, I. B., Deisseroth, K., & Janak, P. H. (2013). A causal link between prediction errors, dopamine neurons and learning. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 966-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3413
279. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2012). Video game practice optimizes executive control skills in dual-task and task switching situations. Acta Psychologica, 140, 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.001
280. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
281. Stürmer, B., Nigbur, R., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2011). Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00335
282. Swick, D., Ashley, V., & Turken, U. (2011). Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks. Neuroimage, 56, 1655-1665.
283. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211619
284. Theeuwes, J., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2012). Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research, 74, 80-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.024
285. Thomson, D. R., D'Ascenzo, M., & Milliken, B. (2013). Learning what to expect: Context-specific control over intertrial priming effects in singleton search. Memory & Cognition, 41, 533-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0278-1
286. Thomson, D. R., & Milliken, B. (2011). A switch in task affects priming of pop-out: Evidence for the role of episodes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 318-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0046-x
287. Thomson, D. R., Willoughby, K., & Milliken, B. (2014). Implicit learning modulates attention capture: Evidence from an item-specific proportion congruency manipulation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 551. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00551
288. Thorell, L. B., Lindqvist, S., Bergman Nutley, S., Bohlin, G., & Klingberg, T. (2009). Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Developmental Science, 12, 106-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x
289. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York, NY: Macmillan Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.55072
290. Thorndike, E. L. (1933). A proof of the law of effect. Science, 77, 173-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.77.1989.173-a
291. Tolman, E. C. (1925). Purpose and cognition: The determiners of animal learning. Psychological Review, 32, 285-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0072784
292. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0061626
293. Torres-Quesada, M., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica, 142, 203-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.015
294. Umemoto, A., & Holroyd, C. B. (2015). Task-specific effects of reward on task switching. Psychological Research, 79, 698-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0595-z
295. Umiltà, C. (1988). The control operations of consciousness. In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 334-356). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
296. Upton, D. J., Enticott, P. G., Croft, R. J., Cooper, N. R., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2010). ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 351-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2369-1
297. Vallesi, A., Hasher, L., & Stuss, D. T. (2010). Age-related differences in transfer costs: Evidence from go/nogo tasks. Psychology and Aging, 25, 963-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020300
298. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019791
299. van Gaal, S., Lamme, V. A., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Dissociable brain mechanisms underlying the conscious and unconscious control of behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 91-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21431
300. van Gaal, S., Lamme, V. A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 5, e11508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011508
301. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2008). Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8053-8062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1278-08.2008
302. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2010). Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4143-4150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2992-09.2010
303. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P., & Lamme, V. A. (2009). Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1129-1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013551
304. van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20, 1473-1477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x
305. van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P., & Hommel, B. (2012). Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 90, 234-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.018
306. Vecera, S. P., Cosman, J. D., Vatterott, D. B., & Roper, Z. J. (2014). The control of visual attention: Toward a unified account. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 60, 303-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800090-8.00008-1
307. Veling, H., Aarts, H., & Stroebe, W. (2011). Fear signals inhibit impulsive behavior toward rewarding food objects. Appetite, 56, 643-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.018
308. Verbruggen, F., Best, M., Bowditch, W. A., Stevens, T., & McLaren, I. P. (2014). The inhibitory control reflex. Neuropsychologia, 65, 263-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.014
309. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulusresponse compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120, 307-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003
310. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013170
311. Verbruggen, F., Stevens, T., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: An attentional account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1295-1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036542
312. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115, 518-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518
313. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2009). Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 252-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.007
314. Verguts, T., Vassena, E., & Silvetti, M. (2015). Adaptive effort investment in cognitive and physical tasks: A neurocomputational model. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00057
315. Vietze, I., & Wendt, M. (2009). Context specificity of conflict frequencydependent control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1391-1400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210802426908
316. Wagenmakers, E-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194023
317. Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2007). The costs and benefits of cross-task priming. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1175-1186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193487
318. Weibel, S., Giersch, A., Dehaene, S., & Huron, C. (2013). Unconscious task set priming with phonological and semantic tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 517-527.
319. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2011). Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 910-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0119-4
320. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644
321. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Vietze, I. (2008). Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 135-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.135
322. Wentura, D., Müller, P., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Attentional capture by evaluative stimuli: Gain-and loss-connoting colors boost the additionalsingleton effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 701-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0531-z
323. Wickelgren, W. A. (1979). Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus congenitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system. Psychological Review, 86, 44-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.44
324. Wokke, M. E., van Gaal, S., Scholte, H. S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Lamme, V. A. (2011). The flexible nature of unconscious cognition. PLoS ONE, 6, e25729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025729
325. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03200774
326. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.483
327. Wühr, P., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2015). Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: Evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 779-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.966729
328. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.676
329. Yantis, S., Anderson, B. A., Wampler, E. K., & Laurent, P. A. (2012). Reward and attentional control in visual search. In M. D. Dodd and J. H. Flowers (Eds.), The influence of attention, learning, and motivation on visual search (pp. 91-116). New York, NY: Springer.
330. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.601
331. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003a). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.455
332. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003b). The effects of recent practice on task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 919-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.919
333. Young, S. G., Brown, C. M., & Ambady, N. (2012). Priming a natural or human-made environment directs attention to context-congruent threatening stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 927-933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.625399
334. Zehetleitner, M., Goschy, H., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Top-down control of attention: It's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 941-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027629
335. Zhaoping, L. (2008). Attention capture by eye of origin singletons even without awareness-A hallmark of a bottom-up saliency map in the primary visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/8.5.1
336. Zhou, F. A., & Davis, G. (2012a). Momentary conscious pairing eliminates unconscious-stimulus influences on task selection. PLoS ONE, 7, e46320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046320
337. Zhou, F. A., & Davis, G. (2012b). Unconscious priming of task sets: The role of spatial attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 105-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0221-8