Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space

Psychological Research

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 300-312

  Kleinsorge, Thomas ^a   Heuer, Herbert ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000935994     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004260050060     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bullock, D., & Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychological Review, 95, 49-90.
3. Cruse, H., Dean, J., Heuer, H., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Utilization of sensory information for motor control. In: O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 43-79). Berlin: Springer.
4. De Jong, R.,Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
5. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
6. Fitts, P. M. (1959). Human information handling in speeded tasks (Rep. No. RC-109). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Research Center.
7. Ghez, C., Favilla, M., Ghilardi, M. F., Gordon, J., Bermejo, R., & Pullman, S. (1997). Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Experimental Brain Research, 115, 217-233.
8. Goodman, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475-495.
9. Gotham, A. M., Brown, R. G., & Marsden, C. D. (1988). "Frontal" cognitive function in patients with Parkinson's disease "on" and "off" levodopa. Brain, 111, 299-321.
10. Grice, G. R., Hunt, R., Kushner, B., & Morrow, C. (1974). Stimulus intensity, catch trial effects, and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: A variable criterion theory interpretation. Memory & Cognition, 2, 758-770.
11. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
12. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica 39, 427-439.
13. Heuer, H. (1982). Choice between finger movements of different and identical forms: The effect of relative signal frequency. Psychological Research, 44, 323-342.
14. Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1998). Period duration of physical and imaginary movement sequences affects contralateral amplitude modulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 755-771.
15. Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich, C. (1998). The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 381-392.
16. Kirby, N. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In: A.T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129-172). New York: Academic Press.
17. Kleinsorge, T. (1997). Die Kodierungsspezifität von Reiz-Reaktions-Kompatibilität. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
18. Kluwe, R. H. (1997). Intentionale Steuerung kognitiver Prozesse. Kognitionswissen schaft, 6, 53-69.
19. Lépine, D., Glencross, D., & Requin, J. (1989). Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 347-362.
20. Meiran, N. (1996). The reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
21. Merz, F., Klaveram, K.-Th., & Huber, K. (1981). Der Einfluß kognitiver Faktoren auf Steuerleistungen. In: L. Tent (Ed.), Erkennen - Wollen - Handeln (pp. 327-335). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
22. Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In: H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 72-86). Berlin: Springer.
23. Owen, A. M., Roberts, A. C., Polkey, C. E., Sahakian, B. J., & Robins, T. W. (1991). Extra-dimensional versus intra-dimensional set shifting performance following frontal lobe excisions, temporal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man. Neuropsychologia, 29, 993-1006.
24. Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Vyas, S. M. (1974). Interference between binary classification judgements and some repetition effects in a serial choice reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1181-1190.
25. Restle, F. (1970). Theory of serial pattern learning: Structural trees. Psychological Review, 77, 481-495.
26. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
27. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
28. Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A.M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372-393.
29. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Komblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223-243.
30. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (in press). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
31. Rüssel, B. (1908). Mathematical logic as based on the Theory of Types. American Journal of Mathematics, 30, 222-262.
32. Shaffer, L.H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70 284-288.
33. Shaffer, L.H. (1967). Transition effects in three-choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 101-108.
34. Soetens, E., Boer, L.C., & Hueting, J.E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 598-616.
35. Spijkers, W., & Heuer, H. (1995). Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 716-740.
36. Stablum, F., Leonardi, G., Mazzoldi, M., Umiltà, C., & Morra, S. (1994). Attention and control deficits following closed head injury. Cortex, 30, 603-618.
37. Williams, J. A. (1966). Sequential effects in disjunctive reaction time: Implications for decision models. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 665-672.