Event-related potentials as brain correlates of item specific proportion congruent effects

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1442-1455

  Shedden, Judith M ^a   Milliken, Bruce ^a   Watter, Scott ^a   Monteiro, Sandra ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Automatic control; Context effects; Control processes; ERP; Event related potentials; ISPC; Item specific proportion congruent; P1

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONFLICT; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITEM SPECIFIC PROPORTION CONGRUENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; ONLINE MONITORING; RESPONSE TIME; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; AUTOMATIC CONTROL; CONTEXT EFFECTS; CONTROL PROCESSES; ERP; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; ISPC; ITEM-SPECIFIC PROPORTION CONGRUENT; P1;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; COGNITION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886662973     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bugg J.M. Dissociating levels of cognitive control: The case of Stroop interference. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2012, 21:302-309. 10.1177/0963721412453586.
2. Bugg J.M., Crump M.J. In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers In Psychology 2012, 3:367. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367.
3. Bugg J.M., Hutchison K.A. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2013, 39:433-449. 10.1037/a0029145.
4. Bugg J.M., Jacoby L.L., Chanani S. Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:844-859.
5. Bugg J.M., Jacoby L.L., Toth J.P. Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1484-1494.
6. Cañadas E., Rodríguez-Bailón R., Milliken B., Lupiáñez J. Social categories as a context for the allocation of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, 10.1037/a0029794.
7. Corballis P.M., Gratton G. Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:191-209.
8. Crump M.J., Gong Z., Milliken B. The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:316-321.
9. Crump M.J., Milliken B. The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1523-1532.
10. Crump M.J., Vaquero J.M., Milliken B. Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:22-36.
11. Heinemann A., Kunde W., Kiesel A. Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:966-976.
12. Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D.S., Hessels S. Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:638-644.
13. Jacoby L.L., Toth J.P., Yonelinas A.P. Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993, 122:139.
14. Jonides J. Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. Attention and performance IX 1981, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J.B. Long, A.D. Baddeley (Eds.).
15. King J.A., Korb F.M., Egner T. Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:8192-8200.
16. Leboe J.P., Wong J., Crump M., Stobbe K. Probe-specific proportion task repetition effects on switching costs. Perception & Psychophysics 2008, 70:935-945.
17. Lehle C., Hübner R. On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:814-818.
18. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 1988, 95:492-527.
19. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:166-174.
20. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J., Williamson J. Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1984, 22:135-138.
21. Lowe D.G., Mitterer J.O. Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1982, 36:684-700.
22. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 9:353-383.
23. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R. Attention and cognitive control. Information processing and cognition 1975, 55-85. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.L. Solso (Ed.).
24. Schmidt J., Besner D. The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:514-523.
25. Schneider W., Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 1977, 84:1-66.
26. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84:127-190.
27. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 28:643-662.
28. Tzelgov J., Henik A., Berger J. Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20:727-735.
29. Vietze I., Wendt M. Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1391-1400.
30. Wendt M., Kiesel A. Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:910-916.
31. Wendt M., Kluwe R.H., Vietze I. Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:135-140.