Reward modulates oculomotor competition between differently valued stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 108, Issue , 2015, Pages 103-112

  Bucker, Berno ^a   Silvis, Jeroen D ^a   Donk, Mieke ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Global effect; Oculomotor selection; Reward; Stimulus competition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REWARD; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EYE MOVEMENT; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922998045     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson B.A., Laurent P.A., Yantis S. Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(11):e27926.
2. Anderson B.A., Laurent P.A., Yantis S. Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011, 108(25):10367-10371.
3. Anderson B.A., Yantis S. Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2012, 74(8):1644-1653.
4. Anderson B.A., Yantis S. Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2013, 39(1):6.
5. Awh E., Belopolsky A.V., Theeuwes J. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16(8):437-443.
6. Bucker B., Belopolsky A.V., Theeuwes J. Distractors that signal reward attract the eyes. Visual Cognition 2014, 1-24.
7. Bucker B., Theeuwes J. The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2014, 1-12.
8. Chelazzi L., Perlato A., Santandrea E., Della Libera C. Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research 2013, 85:58-72.
9. Coren S., Hoenig P. Effect of non-target stimuli upon length of voluntary saccades. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1972, 34(2):499-508.
10. Della Libera C., Chelazzi L. Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science 2009, 20(6):778-784.
11. Deubel H., Wolf W., Hauske G. The evaluation of the oculomotor error signal. Advances in Psychology 1984, 22:55-62.
12. Engelmann J.B., Pessoa L. Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion 2007, 7(3):668.
13. Failing M.F., Theeuwes J. Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision 2014, 14(5):6.
14. Fecteau J.H., Munoz D.P. Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(8):382-390.
15. Findlay J.M. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research 1982, 22(8):1033-1045.
16. Glimcher P.W., Sparks D.L. Effects of low-frequency stimulation of the superior colliculus on spontaneous and visually guided saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology 1993, 69:953.
17. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28(5):1039.
18. Hartigan J.A., Hartigan P.M. The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics 1985, 70-84.
19. He P.Y., Kowler E. The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for" center-of-gravity" tendencies. Vision Research 1989, 29(9):1165.
20. Heeman J., Theeuwes J., Van der Stigchel S. The time course of top-down control on saccade averaging. Vision Research 2014.
21. Hickey C., Chelazzi L., Theeuwes J. Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(33):11096-11103.
22. Hikosaka O., Kim H.F., Yasuda M., Yamamoto S. Basal ganglia circuits for reward value-guided behavior. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2014, 37(1).
23. Hikosaka O., Takikawa Y., Kawagoe R. Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements. Physiological Reviews 2000, 80(3):953-978.
24. Kim H.F., Hikosaka O. Distinct basal ganglia circuits controlling behaviors guided by flexible and stable values. Neuron 2013, 79(5):1001-1010.
25. Logan G.D. Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 1985, 39(2):367.
26. McPeek R.M., Han J.H., Keller E.L. Competition between saccade goals in the superior colliculus produces saccade curvature. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89(5):2577-2590.
27. Peck C.J., Jangraw D.C., Suzuki M., Efem R., Gottlieb J. Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(36):11182-11191.
28. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32(1):3-25.
29. Sakai K., Kitaguchi K., Hikosaka O. Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 152(2):229-242.
30. Schall J.D. Neuronal basis of saccadic eye movements. Vision and Visual Dysfunction 1991, 4:388-442.
31. Schultz W., Dayan P., Montague P.R. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 1997, 275(5306):1593-1599.
32. Silvis J.D., Van der Stigchel S. How memory mechanisms are a key component in the guidance of our eye movements: Evidence from the global effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2014, 21(2):357-362.
33. Small D.M., Gitelman D., Simmons K., Bloise S.M., Parrish T., Mesulam M.M. Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(12):1855-1865.
34. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50(2):184-193.
35. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 51(6):599-606.
36. Theeuwes J., Belopolsky A.V. Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research 2012, 74:80-85.
37. Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F., Hahn S., Irwin D.E. Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science 1998, 9(5):379-385.
38. Thompson K.G., Bichot N.P., Sato T.R. Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 93(1):337-351.
39. Van der Stigchel S., Heeman J., Nijboer T.C.W. Averaging is not everything: The saccade global effect weakens with increasing stimulus size. Vision Research 2012, 62:108-115.
40. Van der Stigchel S., Nijboer T.C. The global effect: What determines where the eyes land. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2011, 4(2):1-13.
41. Van der Stigchel S., Meeter M., Theeuwes J. The spatial coding of the inhibition evoked by distractors. Vision Research 2007, 47(2):210-218.
42. Van Zoest W., Donk M., Theeuwes J. The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance 2004, 30(4):746.
43. Yamamoto S., Kim H.F., Hikosaka O. Reward value-contingent changes of visual responses in the primate caudate tail associated with a visuomotor skill. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33(27):11227-11238.
44. Yasuda M., Yamamoto S., Hikosaka O. Robust representation of stable object values in the oculomotor basal ganglia. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32(47):16917-16932.