Isolating a mediated route for response congruency effects in task switching

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 235-245

  Schneider, Darryl W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Dual task processing; Response congruency; Task switching

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84925822330     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000049     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602-639. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602
2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484-502. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.33.3.484
4. Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37-85. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005
5. Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2007). The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1140-1154.
6. Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2009). The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: Flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions. Experimental Psychology, 56, 128-133. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.128
7. E-Prime (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
8. *Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
9. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0770
10. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14(Whole No. 89), 5-82.
11. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874. doi:10.1037/a0019842
12. Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: On the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117-125. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0004-8
13. Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433-444. doi:10.3758/BF03193420
14. Liefooghe, B., De Houwer, J., & Wenke, D. (2013). Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 481-487. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0374-7
15. Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1325-1335. doi:10.1037/ a0028148
16. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
17. Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376
18. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2010). Distinguishing reconfiguration and compound-cue retrieval in task switching. Psychologica Belgica, 50, 413-433. doi:10.5334/pb-50-3-4-413
19. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220. doi:10.1037/h0087426
20. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
21. Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249. doi:10.1007/s004269900004
22. Meiran, N. (2014). The task-cuing paradigm: A user's guide. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 45-73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000 .0736
24. Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137-157. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.137
25. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327-342. doi:10.3758/BF03194391
26. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
27. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 1. Locus of practice effects in speeded choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 20-32. doi:10.1037/0278-7393 .17.1.20
28. Reisenauer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2013). The impact of task rules on distracter processing: Automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli. Psychological Research, 77, 128-138. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0413-4
29. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
30. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
31. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Selecting a response in task switching: Testing a model of compound cue retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 122- 136. doi:10.1037/a0013744
32. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2010). The target of task switching. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 129-133. doi: 10.1037/a0019598
33. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: Not so different after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 405-415. doi:10.1037/a0021967
34. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2014). Modelling response selection in task switching: Testing the contingent encoding assumption. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1074-1095. doi:10.1080/ 17470218.2013.843009
35. Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89-103. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.89
36. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626. doi:10.1037/a0019791
37. Waszak, F., Pfister, R., & Kiesel, A. (2013). Top-down versus bottom-up: When instructions overcome automatic retrieval. Psychological Research, 77, 611-617. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0459-3
38. Waszak, F., Wenke, D., & Brass, M. (2008). Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. Acta Psychologica, 127, 30-35. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.12.005
39. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425-432. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0117-3
40. Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2007). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research, 71, 92-106. doi:10.1007/ s00426-005-0038-y
41. Yamaguchi, M., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Automaticity without extensive training: The role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 347-354. doi:10.3758/ s13423-011-0050-8
42. Yehene, E., Meiran, N., & Soroker, N. (2005). Task alternation cost without task alternation: Measuring intentionality. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1858-1869. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.010