ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: A time course analysis

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue DEC, 2014, Pages

  Atalay, Nart B ^a   Misirlisoy, Mine ^b  

^a TOBB UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY   (Turkey)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict monitoring; Contingency learning; ISPC effect; Stimulus onset asynchrony; Stroop task

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923349762     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01410     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abrahamse, E.L., Duthoo, W., Notebaert, W., and Risko, E.F. (2013). Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 39, 1552. doi: 10.1037/a0032426
2. Appelbaum, L.G., Boehler, C.N., Won, R., Davis, L., and Woldorff, M.G. (2012). Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 1834-1848. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00209
3. Appelbaum, L.G., Meyerhoff, K.L., and Woldorff, M.G. (2009). Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect. Cereb. Cortex 19, 2508-2521. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp036
4. Atalay, N.B., Ceylan, S., and Misirlisoy, M. (2013). Effects of language on stimulus response contingency learning [Dil degisimlemesinin uyarici tepki izlerliginin ögrenilmesi üzerindeki etkisi]. Turk Psikol. Derg. 28, 73-83.
5. Atalay, N.B., and Misirlisoy, M. (2012). Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within- and between-language ISPC effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 38, 1578-1590. doi: 10.1037/a0028458
6. Blais, C., Harris, M.B., Guerrero, J.V., and Bunge, S.A. (2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. Q.J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 268-276. doi: 10.1080/17470211003775234
7. Blais, C., Robidoux, S., Risko, E.F., and Besner, D. (2007). Item-specific adaptation and the conflict monitoring hypothesis: a computational model. Psychol. Rev. 114, 1076-1086. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1076
8. Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S., and Cohen, J.D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624-652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
9. Bugg, J.M., and Crump, M.J.C. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: a review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Front. Psychol. 3:367. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
10. Bugg, J.M., and Hutchison, K.A. (2013). Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 39, 433-449. doi: 10.1037/a0029145
11. Bugg, J.M., Jacoby, L.L., and Chanani, S. (2011b). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 37, 844-859. doi: 10.1037/a0019957
12. Bugg, J.M., McDaniel, M.A., Scullin, M.K., and Braver, T.S. (2011a). Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 37, 1595-1606. doi: 10.1037/a0024670
13. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., and McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychol. Rev. 97, 332-361. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
14. Crump, M.J.C., Vaquero, J.M.M., and Milliken, B. (2008). Context-specific learning and control: the role of awareness, task-relevance, and relative salience. Conscious Cogn. 17, 22-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.004
15. De Jong, R., Liang, C.C., and Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response concordance. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 20, 731-750. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
16. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175-191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
17. Glaser, M.O., and Glaser, W.R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 8, 875-894. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.875
18. Hommel, B., Proctor, R.W., and Vu, K.-P.L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol. Res. 68, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
19. Hutchison, K.A. (2011). The interactive effects of list-based control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 37, 851-860. doi: 10.1037/a0023437
20. Jacoby, L.L., Lindsay, D.S., and Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 10, 638-644. doi: 10.3758/BF03196526
21. Jacoby, L.L., McElree, B.D., and Trainham, T.N. (1999). "Automatic influences as accessibility bias in memory and Stroop tasks: toward a formal model," in Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application, eds D. Gopher and A. Koriat (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 461-486.
22. Levin, Y., and Tzelgov, J. (2014). Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their "control." Front. Psychol. 5:463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00463
23. Logan, G.D., and Zbrodoff, N.J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Mem. Cogn. 7, 166-174. doi: 10.3758/BF03197535
24. Logan, G.D., Zbrodoff, N.J., and Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 22, 135-138. doi: 10.3758/BF03333784
25. Matsumoto, K., and Tanaka, K. (2004). Conflict and cognitive control. Science 303, 969-970. doi: 10.1126/science.1094733
26. Mayr, U., Awh, E., and Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 450-452. doi: 10.1038/nn1051
27. Posner, M.I., and Synder, C.R. (1975). "Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals," in Attention and Performance V, eds P.M. Rabbitt and S. Dornic (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 669-682.
28. Roelofs, A. (2010a). Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 36, 411-422. doi: 10.1037/a0018523
29. Roelofs, A. (2010b). Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance. Acta Psychol. 133, 146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.003
30. Schmidt, J.R. (2013a). Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 615-630. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
31. Schmidt, J.R. (2013b). The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychol. 142, 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004
32. Schmidt, J.R. (2013c). Temporal learning and list-level proportion congruency: conflict adaptation or learning when to respond? PLoS ONE 8:e0082320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082320
33. Schmidt, J.R. (2014). Contingencies and attentional capture: the importance of matching stimulus informativeness in the item-specific proportion congruent task. Front. Psychol. 5:540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00540
34. Schmidt, J.R., and Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. 34, 514-523. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
35. Schmidt, J.R., and De Houwer, J. (2012). Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task? Q.J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 408-425. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.632486
36. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643-662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
37. Sugg, M.J., and McDonald, J.E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 647-675. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.647
38. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., and Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Mem. Cogn. 20, 727-735. doi: 10.3758/BF03202722
39. Verguts, T., and Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychol. Rev. 115, 518-525. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518