Motivating inhibition - reward prospect speeds up response cancellation

Cognition

Volumn 125, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 498-503

  Boehler, Carsten N ^a   Hopf, Jens Max ^b   Stoppel, Christian M ^b   Krebs, Ruth M ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Motivation; Response inhibition; Reward; Stop signal response time; Stop signal task

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE INHIBITION; RESPONSE TIME; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD;

EID: 84867403989     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barkley R.A. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 121(1):65-94.
2. Boehler C.N., Appelbaum L.G., Krebs R.M., Hopf J.M., Woldorff M.G. The influence of different stop-signal response time estimation procedures on behavior-behavior and brain-behavior correlations. Behavioural Brain Research 2012, 229(1):123-130.
3. Chambers C.D., Garavan H., Bellgrove M.A. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33(5):631-646.
4. Cohen J.R., Poldrack R.A. Automaticity in motor sequence learning does not impair response inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15(1):108-115.
5. Della Libera C., Chelazzi L. Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science 2006, 17(3):222-227.
6. Della Libera C., Chelazzi L. Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science 2009, 20(6):778-784.
7. Eagle D.M., Wong J.C., Allan M.E., Mar A.C., Theobald D.E., Robbins T.W. Contrasting roles for dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in the dorsomedial striatum but not the nucleus accumbens core during behavioral inhibition in the stop-signal task in rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(20):7349-7356.
8. Engelmann J.B., Damaraju E., Padmala S., Pessoa L. Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance. transient and sustained motivational effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2009, 3:4.
9. Ersche K.D., Jones P.S., Williams G.B., Turton A.J., Robbins T.W., Bullmore E.T. Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction. Science 2012, 335(6068):601-604.
10. Guitart-Masip M., Fuentemilla L., Bach D.R., Huys Q.J., Dayan P., Dolan R.J., et al. Action dominates valence in anticipatory representations in the human striatum and dopaminergic midbrain. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(21):7867-7875.
11. Hickey C., Chelazzi L., Theeuwes J. Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(33):11096-11103.
12. Krebs R.M., Boehler C.N., Woldorff M.G. The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task. Cognition 2010, 117(3):341-347.
13. Leotti L.A., Wager T.D. Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36(2):430-447.
14. Liljeholm M., O'Doherty J.P. Anything you can do, you can do better: Neural substrates of incentive-based performance enhancement. PLoS Biology 2012, 10(2):e1001272.
15. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 1988, 95(4):492-527.
16. Logan G.D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user's guide to the stop signal paradigm. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language 1994, 189-239. Academic Press, San Diego. D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds.).
17. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 1984, 91:295-327.
18. Mirabella G., Bertini G., Samengo I., Kilavik B.E., Frilli D., Della Libera C., et al. Neurons in area V4 of the macaque translate attended visual features into behaviorally relevant categories. Neuron 2007, 54(2):303-318.
19. Munakata Y., Herd S.A., Chatham C.H., Depue B.E., Banich M.T., O'Reilly R.C. A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15(10):453-459.
20. Padmala S., Pessoa L. Interactions between cognition and motivation during response inhibition. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(2):558-565.
21. Pessoa L. How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(4):160-166.
22. Pessoa, L., & Engelmann, J. B. (2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4.
23. Pessoa L., Padmala S., Kenzer A., Bauer A. Interactions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition. Emotion 2012, 12(1):192-197.
24. Ridderinkhof K.R., Forstmann B.U., Wylie S.A., Burle B., van den Wildenberg W.P.M. Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: resisting the call of the sirens. Wires: Cognitive Science 2011, 2(2):174-192.
25. Sagaspe P., Schwartz S., Vuilleumier P. Fear and stop: a role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals. Neuroimage 2011, 55(4):1825-1835.
26. Savine A.C., Braver T.S. Motivated cognitive control: reward incentives modulate preparatory neural activity during task-switching. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(31):10294-10305.
27. Scheres A., Oosterlaan J., Sergeant J.A. Response inhibition in children with DSM-IV subtypes of AD/HD and related disruptive disorders: the role of reward. Child Neuropsychol 2001, 7(3):172-189.
28. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84(2):127-190.
29. Sinopoli K.J., Schachar R., Dennis M. Reward improves cancellation and restraint inhibition across childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology 2011, 47(5):1479-1489.
30. van Gaal S., Ridderinkhof K.R., van den Wildenberg W.P., Lamme V.A. Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(4):1129-1139.
31. Verbruggen, F., Chambers, C. D., & Logan, G. D. (in press). Fictitious inhibitory differences: How skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychological Science.
32. Verbruggen F., De Houwer J. Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm. Cognition & Emotion 2007, 21(2):391-403.
33. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137(4):649-672.
34. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009, 33(5):647-661.
35. Wiers R.W., Eberl C., Rinck M., Becker E.S., Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science 2011, 22(4):490-497.
36. Wise R.A. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5(6):483-494.
37. Yu J., Hung D.L., Tseng P., Tzeng O.J., Muggleton N.G., Juan C.H. Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control. Cognition 2012, 124(2):251-255.