Control of spatial orienting: Context-specific proportion cued effects in an exogenous spatial cueing task

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue , 2014, Pages 220-233

  Gough, Alex ^a   Garcia, Jesse ^a   Torres Quesada, Maryem ^b   Milliken, Bruce ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Context specific learning; Spatial orienting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AWARENESS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTING RESPONSE; READING; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STROOP TEST; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AWARENESS; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908380314     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barch D.M., Braver T.S., Akbudak E., Conturo T., Ollinger J., Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of response modality and processing domain. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11:837-848.
2. Barch D.M., Braver T.S., Sabb F.W., Noll D.C. Anterior cingulate and the monitoring of response conflict: Evidence from an fMRI study of overt verb generation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:298-309.
3. Bartolomeo P., Decaix C., Sieroff E. The phenomenology of endogenous orienting. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:144-161.
4. Blais C., Besner D. Reverse Stroop effects with untranslated responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(6):1345-1353.
5. Blais C., Robidoux S., Risko E.F., Besner D. Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review 2007, 114:1076-1086.
6. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108(3):624-652.
7. Botvinick M., Nystrom L.E., Fissell K., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999, 402:179-181.
8. Bugg J.M., Crump M.J.C. In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:367.
9. Bugg J.M., Jacoby L.L., Chanani S. Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37(3):844-859.
10. Bugg J.M., Jacoby L.L., Toth J.P. Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1484-1494.
11. Cañadas E., Rodríguez-Bailón R., Milliken B., Lupiáñez J. Social categories as a context for the allocation of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029794.
12. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280:747-749.
13. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:28-71.
14. Crump M.J.C., Gong Z., Milliken B. The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(2):316-321.
15. Crump M.J.C., Vaquero J., Milliken B. Context specific learning and control: The role of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness & Cognition 2008, 17:22-36.
16. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
17. Fernandez-Duque D., Knight M. Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(2):340-355.
18. Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J., Humphreys G. Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36(1):147-161.
19. Heinemann A., Kunde W., Kiesel A. Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:966-976.
20. Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D.S., Hessels S. Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10(3):638-644.
21. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
22. King J.A., Korb F., Egner T. Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:8192-8200.
23. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(4):138-147.
24. Lambert A., Naikar N., McLachlan K., Aitken V. A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1999, 25:321-340.
25. Leboe J.P., Wong J., Crump M., Stobbe K. Probe-specific proportion task repetition effects on switching costs. Perception & Psychophysics 2008, 70:935-945.
26. Lehle C., Hübner R. On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:814-818.
27. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in Stroop-like tasks. Memory and Cognition 1979, 7:166-174.
28. Lowe D., Mitterer J.O. Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1982, 36:684-700.
29. Lu C.-H., Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon effect and Congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:174-207.
30. Lupianez J., Klein R.M., Bartolomeo P. Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:1003-1014.
31. Peterson B.S., Kane M.J., Alexander G.M., Lacadie C., Skudlarski P., Leung H., et al. An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 13:427-440.
32. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes 1984, 531-556. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Bouma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
33. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L., Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1985, 2:211-228.
34. Risko E.F., Stolz J.A. The proportion valid effect in covert orienting: Strategic control or implicit learning?. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:432-442.
35. Schmidt J.R., Besner D. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34(3):514.
36. Simon J.R., Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1967, 51:300-304.
37. Spalek T.M., Hammad S. The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science 2005, 16(1):15-18.
38. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18(6):643-662.
39. Torres-Quesada M., Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J. Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica 2013, 142:203-210.
40. Van Selst M., Jolicoeur P. A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 47A:631-650.
41. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review 2008, 115(2):518-525.
42. Wendt M., Kiesel A. Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:910-916.