Task Switching: Interplay of Reconfiguration and Interference Control

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 136, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 601-626

  Vandierendonck, André ^a   Liefooghe, Baptist ^a   Verbruggen, Frederick ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Interference; Task switching; Task set reconfiguration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROL; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COGNITION; CUES; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MEMORY; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 77954171061     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019791     Document Type: Article

References (247)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting attentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing 1994, 421-452. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
2. Allport A., Wylie G. Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 36-70. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
3. Altmann E.M. Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2002, 66:287-297. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0102-9.
4. Altmann E.M. Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done?. Psychological Science 2004, 15:616-622. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x.
5. Altmann E.M. The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:153-163.
6. Altmann E.M. Repetition priming in task switching: Do the benefits dissipate?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:535-540.
7. Altmann E.M. Task switching is not cue switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1016-1022.
8. Altmann E.M. Comparing switch costs: Alternating runs and explicit cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:475-483. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.475.
9. Altmann E.M. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: Evidence from backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:892-899. doi: 10.1037/0278-739133.5.892.
10. Altmann E.M., Gray W.D. Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science 2002, 13:27-33. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00405.
11. Altmann E.M., Gray W.D. An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review 2008, 115:602-639. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.115.3.602.
12. Anderson J.R., Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought 1998, Erlbaum, New York, NY.
13. Arbuthnott K.D. The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1030-1042. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1030.
14. Arbuthnott K.D. Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 2008, 62:91-100. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.2.91.
15. Arbuthnott K., Frank J. Trail Making Test, Part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2000, 22:518-528.
16. Arbuthnott K.D., Woodward T.S. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 2002, 56:18-29. doi: 10.1037/h0087382.
17. Aron A.R., Monsell S., Sahakian B.J., Robbins T.W. A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. Brain 2004, 127:1561-1573. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh169.
18. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010.
19. Arrington C.M. The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:991-997. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.991.
20. Arrington C.M., Altmann E.M., Carr T.H. Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:781-789.
21. Arrington C.M., Logan G.D. The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science 2004, 15:610-615. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x.
22. Arrington C.M., Logan G.D. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:965-978.
23. Arrington C.M., Logan G.D. Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:683-702. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.683.
24. Arrington C.M., Logan G.D., Schneider D.W. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there " true" task switch effects?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:484-502. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.484.
25. Arrington C.M., Rhodes K.M. Perceptual asymmetries influence task choice: The effect of lateralised presentation of hierarchical stimuli. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 2009, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13576500902984695.
26. Baddeley A., Chincotta D., Adlam A. Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:641-657. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.641.
27. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation 1974, 8:47-89. Academic Press, New York, NY. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
28. Band G.P.H., van Nes F.T. Reconfiguration and the bottleneck: Does task switching affect the refractory period effect?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2006, 18:593-623. doi: 10.1080/09541440500423244.
29. Barton J.J.S., Cherkasova M.V., Lindgren K., Goff D.C., Intriligator J.M., Manoach D.S. Antisaccades and task switching studies of control processes in saccadic function in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 956. Neurobiology of eye movement: From molecules to behavior 2002, 250-263. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02824.x.
30. Barton J.J.S., Greenzang C., Hefter R., Edelman J., Manoach D.S. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 168:76-87. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0091-1.
31. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.108.3.624.
32. Braver T.S., Reynolds J.R., Donaldson D.I. Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron 2003, 39:713-726. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00466-5.
33. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:37-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005.
34. Brown S., Lehmann C., Poboka D. A critical test of the failure-to-engage theory of task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:152-159.
35. Bryck R.L., Mayr U. On the role of verbalization during task set selection: Switching or serial order control?. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:611-623.
36. Bryck R.L., Mayr U. Task selection cost asymmetry without task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:128-134. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.128.
37. Burgess P., Simons J.S., Coates L.M.-A., Cannon S. The search for specific planning processes. The cognitive psychology of planning 2005, 199-227. Psychology Press, Hove, England. R. Morris, G. Ward (Eds.).
38. Campbell J.I.D. Handbook of mathematical cognition 2005, Psychology Press, New York, NY.
39. Case R., Kurland D.M., Goldberg J. Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term-memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1982, 33:386-404.
40. Cherkasova M.V., Manoach D.S., Intriligator J.M., Barton J.J.S. Antisaccades and task-switching: Interactions in controlled processing. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 144:528-537. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1075-z.
41. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 1990, 97:332-361.
42. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215. doi: 10.1038/nrn755.
43. Costa A., Santesteban M. Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:491-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002.
44. Cowan N. Working memory capacity 2005, Psychology Press, Hove, England.
45. Daneman M., Carpenter P.A. Individual differences in working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1980, 19:450-466.
46. De Jong R. An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 357-376. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
47. De Jong R. Adult age differences in goal activation and goal maintenance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2001, 13:71-89. doi: 10.1080/09541440042000223.
48. De Jong R., Berendsen E., Cools R. Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101:379-394. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00012-8.
49. Demanet, J., Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). Voluntary task switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
50. Dreisbach G., Goschke T., Haider H. The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2007, 71:383-392. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0041-3.
51. Dreisbach G., Haider H. Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:334-338.
52. Dreisbach G., Haider H., Kluwe R.H. Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:468-483. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.468.
53. Druey M.D., Hübner R. The role of temporal cue-target overlap in backward inhibition under task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:749-754.
54. Druey M.D., Hübner R. Response inhibition under task switching: Its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2008, 72:515-527. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0127-1.
55. Duncan J., Parr A., Woolgar A., Thompson R., Bright P., Cox S., Nimmo-Smith I. Goal neglect and Spearman's g: Competing parts of a complex task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:131-148. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.131.
56. Egner T., Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1784-1790. doi: 10.1038/nn1594.
57. Ellefson M.R., Shapiro L.R., Chater N. Asymmetrical switch costs in children. Cognitive Development 2006, 21:108-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.01.002.
58. Emerson M.J., Miyake A. The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:148-168. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00511-9.
59. Engle R.W., Kane M.J., Tuholski S.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control 1999, 102-134. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. A. Miyake, P. Shah (Eds.).
60. Forstmann B.U., Brass M., Koch I. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2007, 71:393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0040-4.
61. Forstmann B.U., Brass M., Koch I., von Cramon D.Y. Internally generated and directly cued task sets: An investigation with fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:943-952. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.008.
62. Forstmann B.U., Brass M., Koch I., von Cramon D.Y. Voluntary selection of task sets revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:388-398.
63. Forstmann B.U., Ridderinkhof K.R., Kaiser J., Bledowski C. At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:286-296. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.286.
64. Friedman N.P., Miyake A., Young S.E., DeFries J.C., Corley R.P., Hewitt J.K. Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:201-225. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201.
65. Gade M., Koch I. Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:530-534.
66. Gade M., Koch I. Cue-task associations in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:762-769. doi: 10.1080/17470210701268005.
67. Garavan H. Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:263-276.
68. Gilbert S.J. Does task-set reconfiguration create cognitive slack?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:92-100. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.92.
69. Gilbert S.J., Shallice T. Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:297-337. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0770.
70. Gopher D., Armony L., Greenshpan Y. Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:308-339.
71. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 331-355. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J.S. Driver (Eds.).
72. Gotler A., Meiran N., Tzelgov J. Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:890-896.
73. Hahn S., Andersen G.J., Kramer A.F. Multidimensional set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:503-509.
74. Hernandez A.E., Kohnert K.J. Aging and language switching in bilinguals. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 1999, 6:69-83.
75. Houghton G., Pritchard R., Grange J.A. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:466-476. doi: 10.1037/a0014648.
76. Hsieh S. Task shifting in dual-task settings. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2002, 94:407-414.
77. Hübner M., Kluwe R.H., Luna-Rodriguez A., Peters A. Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: No evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:1043-1063. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1043.
78. Hübner R., Futterer T., Steinhauser M. On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:640-653.
79. Hunt A.R., Ishigami Y., Klein R.M. Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:923-927.
80. Hunt A.R., Kingstone A. Multisensory executive functioning. Brain and Cognition 2004, 55:325-327. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.072.
81. Hunt A.R., Klein R.M. Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:529-539.
82. Ivry R.B., Hazeltine E. Task switching in a callosotomy patient and in normal participants: Evidence for response-related sources of interference. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 401-424. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
83. Jersild A.T. Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology 1927, 14:5-81.
84. Jiang Y.H., Saxe R., Kanwisher N. Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Science 2004, 15:390-396. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00690.x.
85. Jost K., Mayr U., Rösler F. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 8:74-84. doi: 10.3758/cabn.8.1.74.
86. Kane M.J., Conway A.R.A., Hambrick D.Z., Engle R.W. Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. Variations in working memory 2007, 21-48. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. A.R.A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M.J. Kane, A. Miyake, J.N. Towse (Eds.).
87. Karbach J., Kray J. How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Developmental Science 2009, 12:978-990. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00846.x.
88. Kiesel A., Wendt M., Peters A. Task switching: On the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2007, 71:117-125. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0004-8.
89. Kleinsorge T. Hierarchical switching with two types of judgment and two stimulus dimensions. Experimental Psychology 2004, 51:145-149. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.145.
90. Kleinsorge T., Gajewski P.D. Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:302-306.
91. Kleinsorge T., Gajewski P.D. Transformation of task components into an integrated representation during task switching. Acta Psychologica 2007, 125:334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.002.
92. Kleinsorge T., Gajewski P.D. Task switching based on externally presented versus internally generated information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2008, 72:501-514. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0137-7.
93. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H. Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 1999, 62:300-312. doi: 10.1007/s004260050060.
94. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H., Schmidtke V. Task-set reconfiguration with binary and three-valued task dimensions. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2001, 65:192-201. doi: 10.1007/s004260000051.
95. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H., Schmidtke V. Processes of task-set reconfiguration: Switching operations and implementation operations. Acta Psychologica 2002, 111:1-28. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00076-2.
96. Kleinsorge T., Heuer H., Schmidtke V. Assembling a task space: Global determination of local shift costs. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2004, 68:31-40. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0134-9.
97. Koch I. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1474-1486.
98. Koch I. The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:488-492.
99. Koch I. Instruction effects in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:448-452. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.448.
100. Koch I., Allport A. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:433-444.
101. Koch I., Gade M., Philipp A.M. Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology 2004, 51:52-58. doi: 10.1027//1618-3169.51.1.52.
102. Koch I., Prinz W., Allport A. Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2005, 69:252-261. doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0180-y.
103. Kramer A.F., Hahn S., Gopher D. Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101:339-378. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00011-6.
104. Kray J., Lindenberger U. Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging 2000, 15:126-147. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126.
105. Lemaire P., Lecacheur M. Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:322-332. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.322.
106. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological assessment 1983, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
107. Liefooghe B., Barrouillet P., Vandierendonck A., Camos V. Working memory costs of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:478-494. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.478.
108. Liefooghe, B., Christiaens, E., & Vandierendonck, A. (2010). Does the composition of the cue information influence the representation of the task-set components in task switching? Manuscript submitted for publication.
109. Liefooghe B., Demanet J., Vandierendonck A. Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:850-857. doi: 10.1080/17470210802570994.
110. Liefooghe, B., Demanet, J., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). Persisting activation in voluntary task switching: It all depends on the instructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
111. Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A., Muyllaert I., Verbruggen F., Vanneste W. The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition. Memory 2005, 13:550-560. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000250.
112. Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Increasing the difficulty of response selection does not increase the switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 2009, 63:323-327. doi: 10.1037/a0016725.
113. Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F., Vandierendonck A., Fias W., Gevers W. Task switching and across-trial distance priming are independent. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2007, 19:1-16. doi: 10.1080/09541440500492033.
114. Lien M.C., Ruthruff E. Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:697-713. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697.
115. Lien M.C., Ruthruff E., Kuhns D. On the difficulty of task switching: Assessing the role of task-set inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:530-535.
116. Lien M.C., Ruthruff E., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:299-315. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.299.
117. Lien M.C., Schweickert R., Proctor R.W. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:692-712. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.692.
118. Logan G.D. Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:218-236.
119. Logan G.D. Out with the old, in with the new: More valid measures of switch cost and retrieval time in the task span procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:139-144.
120. Logan G.D. What it costs to implement a plan: Plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:591-602.
121. Logan G.D., Bundesen C. Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:575-599. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575.
122. Logan G.D., Bundesen C. Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:832-840.
123. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 1984, 91:295-327.
124. Logan G.D., Gordon R.D. Executive control of attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 2001, 108:393-434.
125. Logan G.D., Schneider D.W. Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:347-363. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.347.
126. Logan G.D., Schneider D.W., Bundesen C. Still clever after all these years: Searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:978-994. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.978.
127. Los S.A. On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica 1996, 94:145-188.
128. Luria R., Meiran N. Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:556-574. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.556.
129. Luwel K., Schillemans V., Onghena P., Verschaffel L. Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?. British Journal of Psychology 2009, 100:753-771. doi: 10.1348/000712609x402801.
130. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.
131. Manoach D.S., Thakkar K.N., Cain M.S., Polli F.E., Edelman J.A., Fischl B., Barton J.J. Neural activity is modulated by trial history: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:1791-1798. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3662-06.2007.
132. Mayr U. Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging 2001, 16:96-109.
133. Mayr U. Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:93-99.
134. Mayr U. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:794-799.
135. Mayr U. Sticky plans: Inhibition and binding during serial-task control. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:123-153. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.004.
136. Mayr U., Bell T. On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science 2006, 17:774-780. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01781.x.
137. Mayr U., Bryck R.L. Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:337-350.
138. Mayr U., Bryck R.L. Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2007, 71:107-116. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0039-x.
139. Mayr U., Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:4-26.
140. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1124-1140. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1124.
141. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:362-372. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.36.362.
142. Meier B., Woodward T.S., Rey-Mermet A., Graf P. The bivalency effect in task switching: General and enduring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 2009, 63:201-210. doi: 10.1037/a0014311.
143. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1423-1442. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423.
144. Meiran N. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 377-399. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J.S. Driver (Eds.).
145. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2000, 63:234-249. doi: 10.1007/s004269900004.
146. Meiran N. Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58:1023-1041. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000421.
147. Meiran N. The dual implication of dual affordance: Stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:251-259. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.251.
148. Meiran N., Chorev Z. Phasic alertness and the residual task-switching cost. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:109-124. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.109.
149. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:211-253. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0736.
150. Meiran N., Kessler Y. The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:137-157. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.137.
151. Meiran N., Kessler Y., Adi-Japha E. Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2008, 72:473-500. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0136-8.
152. Meiran N., Marciano H. Limitations in advance task preparation: Switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:540-550.
153. Meuter R.F.I., Allport A. Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:25-40. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2602.
154. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
155. Milan E.G., Sanabria D., Tornay F., Gonzalez A. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences. Acta Psychologica 2005, 118:319-331. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.015.
156. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:167-202.
157. Miller G.A., Galanter E., Pribram K.H. Plans and the structure of behavior 1960, Holt, New York, NY.
158. Miyake A., Emerson M.J., Padilla F., Ahn J.C. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2004, 115:123-142. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.004.
159. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex " frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
160. Miyake A., Shah P. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
161. Monsell S. Control of mental processes. Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition 1996, 93-148. Erlbaum, Hove, England. V. Bruce (Ed.).
162. Monsell S., Mizon G.A. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:493-516. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493.
163. Monsell S., Sumner P., Waters H. Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:327-342.
164. Monsell S., Yeung N., Azuma R. Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2000, 63:250-264. doi: 10.1007/s004269900005.
165. Mueller S.C., Swainson R., Jackson G.M. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching. Brain Research 2007, 1157:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.046.
166. Murray M.M., De Santis L., Thut G., Wylie G.R. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision. Brain and Cognition 2009, 69:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.004.
167. Nicholson R., Karayanidis F., Davies A., Michie P.T. Components of task-set reconfiguration: Differential effects of " switch-to" and " switch-away" cues. Brain Research 2006, 1121:160-176. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.101.
168. Nieuwenhuis S., Monsell S. Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:86-92.
169. Oberauer K. Design for a working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 51. Advances in research and theory 2009, 45-100. Elsevier Academic, San Diego, CA, doi: 10.1016/s0079-7421(09)51002-x. B.H. Ross (Ed.).
170. Oriet C., Jolicoeur P. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1036-1049. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1036.
171. Pashler H. Graded capacity sharing in dual task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:330-342.
172. Pashler H., Baylis G. Procedural learning: 1. Locus of practice effects in speeded choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:20-32. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.20.
173. Philipp A.M., Gade M., Koch I. Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2007, 19:395-416. doi: 10.1080/09541440600758812.
174. Philipp A.M., Jolicoeur P., Falkenstein M., Koch I. Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:1062-1075. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1062.
175. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58:1325-1338. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000656.
176. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2006, 18:624-639. doi: 10.1080/09541440500423269.
177. Poljac E., de Haan A., van Galen G.P. Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:260-267. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.260.
178. Rapoport A., Budescu D.V. Randomization in individual choice behavior. Psychological Review 1997, 104:603-617.
179. Ratcliff R., Van Zandt T., McKoon G. Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review 1999, 106:261-300.
180. Ravizza S.M., Carter C.S. Shifting set about task switching: Behavioral and neural evidence for distinct forms of cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2924-2935. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.006.
181. Reuter B., Philipp A.M., Koch I., Kathmann N. Effects of switching between leftward and rightward pro- and antisaccades. Biological Psychology 2006, 72:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.005.
182. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207.
183. Rubin O., Meiran N. On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1477-1491. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477.
184. Rubinstein J.S., Meyer D.E., Evans J.E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:763-797. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763.
185. Rushworth M.F.S., Hadland K.A., Paus T., Sipila P.K. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: A combined fMRI and TMS study. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 87:2577-2592. doi: 10.1152/jn.00812.2001.
186. Rushworth M.F.S., Passingham R.E., Nobre A.C. Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14:1139-1150.
187. Rushworth M.F.S., Passingham R.E., Nobre A.C. Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:83-98. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.83.
188. Ruthruff E., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:1404-1419. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.6.1404.
189. Saeki E., Saito S. Effect of articulatory suppression on task-switching performance: Implications for models of working memory. Memory 2004, 12:257-271. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000649.
190. Saeki E., Saito S. The role of the phonological loop in task switching performance: The effect of articulatory suppression in the alternating runs paradigm. Psychologia 2004, 47:35-43.
191. Saeki E., Saito S. Verbal representation in task order control: An examination with transition and task cues in random task switching. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:1040-1050. doi: 10.3758/mc.37.7.1040.
192. Saeki E., Saito S., Kawaguchi J. Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching. Memory 2006, 14:965-976. doi: 10.1080/09658210601008973.
193. Sakai K. Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2008, 31:219-245. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125642.
194. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:343-367. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
195. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: Switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:623-640. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.623.
196. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:145-151.
197. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Defining task-set reconfiguration: The case of reference point switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:118-125.
198. Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:370-378. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.370.
199. Schneider D.W., Verbruggen F. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1629-1640. doi: 10.1080/17470210802138511.
200. Schuch S., Koch I. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:92-105.
201. Sdoia S., Ferlazzo F. Stimulus-related inhibition of task set during task switching. Experimental Psychology 2008, 55:322-327. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.322.
202. Siegler R.S., Lemaire P. Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997, 126:71-92.
203. Sigman M., Dehaene S. Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology 2006, 4:1227-1238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040220.
204. Sohn M.H., Anderson J.R. Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:764-778.
205. Sohn M.H., Anderson J.R. Stimulus-related priming during task switching. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:775-780.
206. Spector A., Biederman I. Mental set and mental shift revisited. Journal of Psychology 1976, 89:669-679.
207. Stablum F., Umiltà C., Mazoldi M., Pastore N., Magon S. Rehabilitation of endogenous task shift processes in closed head injury patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2007, 17:1-33. doi: 10.1080/13506280500411111.
208. Stablum F., Umiltà C., Mogentale C., Carlan M., Guerrini C. Rehabilitation of executive deficits in closed head injury and anterior communicating artery aneurysm patients. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2000, 63:265-278. doi: 10.1007/s00426990000.
209. Steinhauser M., Hübner R. Automatic activation of task-related representations in task shifting. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:138-155.
210. Steinhauser M., Hübner R. How task errors affect subsequent behavior: Evidence from distributional analyses of task-switching effects. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:979-990. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.979.
211. Steinhauser M., Hübner R., Druey M. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1826-1835. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.022.
212. Stoet G., Hommel B. Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1625-1640.
213. Stoet G., Snyder L.H. Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:192-197. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.3.192.
214. Strayer D.L., Kramer A.F. Strategies and automaticity: 2. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:342-365.
215. Stroop J.R. Studies of inteference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
216. Sudevan P., Taylor D.A. The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:89-103.
217. Sumner P., Ahmed L. Task switching: The effect of task recency with dual- and single-affordance stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1255-1276. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000187.
218. Telford C.W. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1931, 14:1-36.
219. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1985, 37:571-590. doi: 10.1080/14640748508400920.
220. Tipper S.P., Driver J. Negative priming between pictures and words: Evidence for semantic analysis of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition 1988, 16:64-70.
221. Tornay F.J., Milan E.G. A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 54:785-803. doi: 10.1080/713755984.
222. Turner M.L., Engle R.W. Is working memory capacity task dependent?. Journal of Memory and Language 1989, 28:127-154.
223. Unsworth N., Engle R.W. On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:1038-1066. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.1038.
224. Vandierendonck, A. (in press). The role of executive control in task switching. In P. A. Frensch & R. Schwarzer (Eds.), Cognition and neuropsychology: International perspectives on psychological science (Vol. 1, pp. 35-47). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
225. Vandierendonck A., Christiaens E., Liefooghe B. On the representation of task information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1248-1261. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.7.1248.
226. Van Loy, B., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: Cue processing, task processing, and cue-task tranistion congruency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
227. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Szmalec A., Vandierendonck A. Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:125-130. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.125.
228. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A. On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: Evidence from simple and selective stopping. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2005, 69:262-271. doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0177-6.
229. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A. Selective stopping in task switching: The role of response selection and response execution. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:48-57. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.48.
230. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A., Demanet J. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: A recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:342-356. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.342.
231. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005.
232. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:835-854. doi: 10.1037/a0012726.
233. Verbruggen F., Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. How to stop and change a response: The role of goal activation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1212-1228. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1212.
234. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:361-413. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00520-0.
235. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:1027-1033.
236. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:595-610.
237. Welford A.T. The " psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.
238. Wendt M., Kiesel A. The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2008, 72:425-432. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0117-3.
239. Woodward T.S., Metzak P.D., Meier B., Holroyd C.B. Anterior cingulate cortex signals the requirement to break inertia when switching tasks: A study of the bivalency effect. NeuroImage 2008, 40:1311-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.049.
240. Wylie G., Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of " switch costs." Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2000, 63:212-233.
241. Wylie G.R., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Jumping the gun: Is effective preparation contingent upon anticipatory activation in task-relevant neural circuitry?. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:394-404. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi118.
242. Wylie G.R., Murray M.M., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:105-118.
243. Yehene E., Meiran N. Is there a general task switching ability?. Acta Psychologica 2007, 126:169-195. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.007.
244. Yeung N. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: The elusive homunculus escapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:348-363. doi: 10.1037/a0017894.
245. Yeung N., Monsell S. The effects of recent practice on task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:919-936. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.919.
246. Yeung N., Monsell S. Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:455-469.
247. Yeung N., Nystrom L.E., Aronson J.A., Cohen J.D. Between-task competition and cognitive control in task switching. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:1429-1438. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3109-05.2006.