The Boundaries of Sequential Modulations: Evidence for Set-Level Control

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1898-1914

  Hazeltine, Eliot ^a   Lightman, Erin ^b   Schwarb, Hillary ^b   Schumacher, Eric H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict adaptation; Response competition; Task representation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80355127038     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024662     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akçay ç., Hazeltine E. Feature-overlap and conflict monitoring: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:742-748.
2. Akçay ç., Hazeltine E. Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:958-973.
3. Akçay ç., Hazeltine E. Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:505-511.
4. Blais C., Robidoux S., Risko E.F., Besner D. Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review 2007, 114:1076-1086.
5. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
6. Dutzi I.B., Hommel B. The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research 2009, 73:425-435.
7. Egner T. Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Science 2008, 12:374-380.
8. Egner T., Delano M., Hirsch J. Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage 2007, 35:940-948.
9. Egner T., Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1784-1790.
10. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
11. Fernandez-Duque D., Knight M. Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:340-355.
12. Freitas A.L., Bahar M., Yang S., Banai R. Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science 2007, 18:1040-1043.
13. Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J., Humphreys G.W. Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:147-161.
14. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin O. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:480-506.
15. Hommel B. Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:183-216.
16. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17.
17. Jacoby L.L., Lindsay D.S., Hessels S. Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:638-644.
18. Keele S.W., Ivry R.B., Mayr U., Hazeltine E., Heuer H. The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review 2003, 110:316-339.
19. Kiesel A., Kunde W., Hoffman J. Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:800-806.
20. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
21. Kunde W. Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:198-205.
22. Kunde W., Wühr P. Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:356-367.
23. Logan G.D. Executive control of thought and action: In search of the wild homunculus. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003, 12:45-48.
24. Mayr U., Awh E., Laurey P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:450-452.
25. Milliken B., Joordens S., Merikle P.M., Seiffert A.E. Selective Attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review 1998, 105:203-229.
26. Monsell S., Driver J. Banishing the control homunculus. Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of Cognitive Processes 2000, 3-32. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
27. Notebaert W., Verguts T. Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition 2008, 106:1071-1080.
28. Rogers R., Monsell S. The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 124:207-231.
29. Schuch S., Koch I. The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual-tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:566-582.
30. Schumacher, E. H., Schwarb, H., Lightman, E., & Hazeltine, E. (in press). Investigating the modality specificity of response selection using a temporal flanker task. Psychological Research.
31. Spapé M.M., Hommel B. He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:1117-1121.
32. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schröter H., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1345-1363.
33. Tipper S.P., Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1985, 37:591-611.
34. Ullsperger M., Bylsma L.M., Botvinick M.M. The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 5:467-472.
35. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:361-413.
36. Wendt M., Kluwe R.H., Peters A. Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:644-667.