Unconscious conflicts in unconscious contexts: The role of awareness and timing in flexible conflict adaptation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1701-1718

  Reuss, Heiko ^a   Desender, Kobe ^b   Kiesel, Andrea ^a   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict adaptation; Unconscious processing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; COGNITION; CONFLICT; EGO DEVELOPMENT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904739713     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0036437     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ansorge, U., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S., & Kunde, W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychological Research, 75, 351-365. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0313-4
2. Blais, C. (2010). Implicit versus deliberate control and its implications for awareness. In B. J. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A New perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 141-157). Cambridge, England: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262013840.003 .0007
3. Blais, C., Harris, M. V., Guerrero, J. V., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 268 -276. doi:10.1080/ 17470211003775234
4. Blais, C., Robidoux, S., Risko, E. F., & Besner, D. (2007). Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review, 114, 1076-1086. doi:10.1037/0033-295X .114.4.1076
5. Blais, C., & Verguts, T. (2012). Increasing set size breaks down sequential congruency: Evidence for an associative locus of cognitive control. Acta Psychologica, 141, 133-139. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.009
6. Bodner, G. E., & Dypvik, A. T. (2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 29-47. doi:10.3758/BF03195295
7. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616-647. doi:10.1006/jmla .2001.2791
8. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2004). Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1-11. doi:10.3758/BF03195815
9. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. D., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
10. Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 343-367. doi:10.1037/h0080103
11. Chiu, Y.-C., & Aron, A. R. (2014). Unconsciously triggered response inhibition requires an executive setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 56-61. doi:10.1037/a0031497
12. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.45
13. Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies in the left and right hemifields. Biological Psychology, 64, 191-209. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00109-1
14. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321. doi:10.3758/BF03193850
15. Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523- 1532. doi:10.1080/17470210902752096
16. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211. doi:10.1016/j .tics.2006.03.007
17. Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 14529-14534. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529
18. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1-37. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2
19. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G.,. .. Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600. doi:10.1038/26967
20. Desender, K., & van den Bussche, E. (2012). The magnitude of priming effects is not independent of prime awareness. Reply to Francken, van Gaal, & de Lange (2011). Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1571-1572. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.017
21. Desender, K., van Lierde, E., & van den Bussche, E. (2013). Comparing conscious and unconscious conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 8, e55976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055976
22. Desender, K., van Opstal, F., & van den Bussche, E. (2014). Feeling the conflict: The crucial role of conflict-experience in adaptation. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/ 0956797613511468
23. Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286- 303. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.286
24. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. NeuroImage, 24, 539-547. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.007
25. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737
26. Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2008). Trial-by-trial effects in the affective priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 128, 318-323. doi:10.1016/j .actpsy.2008.03.004
27. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
28. Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702. doi:10.1126/science.273.5282.1699
29. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 22-42. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.22
30. Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d=. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 46-51. doi:10.3758/BF03203619
31. Haynes, J. D., Driver, J., & Rees, G. (2005). Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex. Neuron, 46, 811-821. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.012
32. Heinemann, A., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2009). Context-specific primecongruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 966-976. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.009
33. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268. doi:10.1007/BF00419656
34. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. doi:10.1080/ 713756773
35. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500. doi:10.1016/j.tics .2004.08.007
36. Hommel, B. (2013). Dancing in the dark: No role for consciousness in action control. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 380. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013 .00380
37. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
38. Hughes, G., Velmans, M., & De Fockert, J. D. (2009). Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology, 46, 1258-1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x
39. Jack, A. I., & Shallice, T. (2001). Introspective physicalism as an approach to the science of consciousness. Cognition, 79, 161-196. doi:10.1016/ S0010-0277(00)00128-1
40. Jáskowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920. doi:10.1162/0898929033 22370825
41. Jiang, J., van Gaal, S., Bailey, K., Chen, A., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2791-2798. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.020
42. Kiesel, A., Berner, M. P., & Kunde, W. (2008). Negative congruency effects: A test of the inhibition account. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.003
43. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806. doi:10.3758/BF03194000
44. Kiesel, A., Wagener, A., Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., Fallgatter, A., & Stöcker, C. (2006). Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 397-408. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005 .10.002
45. King, J. A., Korb, F., & Egner, T. (2012). Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8192-8200. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-12.2012
46. Kinoshita, S., Forster, K. I., & Mozer, M. C. (2008). Unconscious cognition isn't that smart: Modulation of masked repetition effect in the naming task. Cognition, 107, 623-649. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11 .011
47. Klapp, S. T. (2007). Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: Strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1366-1376. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1366
48. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205. doi:10.3758/BF03196485
49. Kunde, W., Reuss, H., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Consciousness and cognitive control. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 9-18. doi:10.2478/ v10053-008-0097-x
50. Lau, H. C. (2009). Volition and the functions of consciousness. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 1191-1200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Lau, H. C., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5805-5811. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4335-06.2007
52. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 219-234. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.219
53. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
54. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166-174. doi:10.3758/ BF03197535
55. Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 684 -700. doi: 10.1037/h0080661
56. Mattler, U. (2006). On the locus of priming and inverse priming effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 975-991. doi:10.3758/BF03193359 Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
57. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
58. Pessiglione, M., Petrovic, P., Daunizeau, J., Palminteri, S., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2008). Subliminal instrumental conditioning demonstrated in the human brain. Neuron, 59, 561-567. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07 .005
59. Reuss, H., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hommel, B. (2011). Unconscious activation of task sets. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 556-567. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.014
60. Reuss, H., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2012). A cue from the unconscious-Masked symbols prompt spatial anticipation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 397. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00397
61. Reuss, H., Pohl, C., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2011). Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82-91. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3
62. Risko, E. F., Blais, C., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2008a). Covert orienting: A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 123-127. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.123
63. Risko, E. F., Blais, C., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2008b). Observation: Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1044-1052. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.1044
64. Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00141-X
65. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked prime stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 463-468. doi:10.3758/BF03196596
66. Schmidt, J. R. (2013a). The parallel episodic processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 142, 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004
67. Schmidt, J. R. (2013b). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 615-630. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
68. Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 514-523. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
69. Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J. C., Cheesman, J., & Besner, D. (2007). Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 421-435. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006 .06.010
70. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Now you see it, now you don't: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176-186. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy .2011.06.002
71. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 408 - 425. doi:10.1080/ 17470218.2011.632486
72. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643- 662. doi:10.1037/ h0054651
73. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based priming in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363. doi:10.1037/ 0096-1523.28.6.1345
74. Tanner, W. P., Jr., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61, 401-409. doi:10.1037/ h0058700
75. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727-735. doi:10.3758/BF03202722
76. Umiltá, C. (1988). The control operations of consciousness. In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 334- 356). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
77. van den Bussche, E., van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 452-477. doi:10.1037/a0015329
78. van Gaal, S., Lamme, V. A. F., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 5, e11508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011508
79. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8053-8062. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1278-08.2008
80. van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2009). Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1129-1139. doi:10.1037/a0013551
81. van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Osman, M., & Verguts, T. (2010). Unconscious task application. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 999-1006. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.002
82. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115, 518-525. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518
83. Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6275-6280.
84. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2011). Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 910-916. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0119-4
85. Wendt, M., & Luna-Rodriguez, A. (2009). Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: Role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practice and flanker-response contingencies. Experimental Psychology, 56, 206-217. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.206
86. Wokke, M. E., van Gaal, S., Scholte, H. S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2011). The flexible nature of unconscious cognition. PLoS ONE, 6, e25729. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025729