Reward modulates adaptations to conflict

Cognition

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 324-332

  Braem, Senne ^a   Verguts, Tom ^a   Roggeman, Chantal ^b   Notebaert, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict; Reinforcement learning; Reward; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865766867     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akçay Ç., Hazeltine E. Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:742-748.
2. Amodio D.M., Master S.L., Yee C.M., Taylor S.E. Neurocognitive components of the behavioral psychophysiology inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:11-19.
3. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. Parsing reward. Trends in Neuroscience 2003, 26:507-513.
4. Boksem M.A.S., Tops M., Wester A.E., Meijman T.F., Lorist M.M. Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity. Brain Research 2006, 1101:92-101.
5. Botvinick M.M. Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulated function. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:356-366.
6. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
7. Braem S., Verguts T., Notebaert W. Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:1662-1666.
8. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A computational model of fractioned conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:37-85.
9. Carver C.S., White T.L. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:319-333.
10. Chiew K.S., Braver T.S. Positive affect versus reward: emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:279.
11. Colzato L.S., van Wouwe N.C., Hommel B. Feature binding and affect: Emotional modulation of visuo-motor integration. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:440-446.
12. De Pascalis V., Varriale V., D'Antuono L. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity. Clinical Neurophysiology 2010, 121:60-76.
13. Della Libera C., Chelazzi L. Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science 2006, 17:222-227.
14. Dreisbach G., Fischer R. Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition 2012, 78:94-98.
15. Dreisbach G., Goschke T. How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:343-353.
16. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
17. Fernandez-Duque D., Knight M.B. Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:340-355.
18. Fielding J., Georgiou-Karistianis N., Bradshaw J., Millist L., White O. No sequence dependent modulation of the Simon effect in Parkinson's disease. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:251-260.
19. Frank M.J., Seeberger L.C., O'Reilly R.C. By carrot or by stick: Cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science 2004, 306:1940-1943.
20. Franken I.H.A., Muris P. Gray's impulsivity dimension: A distinction between reward sensitivity and rash impulsiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 2006, 40:1337-1347.
21. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Attention and performance 18: Control of cognitive processes 2000, 331-355. MIT Press. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
22. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 1992, 121:480-506.
23. Hickey C., Chelazzi L., Theeuwes J. Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:11096-11103.
24. Hickey C., Chelazzi L., Theeuwes J. Reward guides vision when it's your thing: Trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e14087.
25. Hickey C., Chelazzi L., Theeuwes J. Reward has a residual impact on target selection in visual search, but not on the suppression of distracters. Visual Cognition 2011, 19:117-184.
26. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17.
27. Krebs R.M., Boehler C.N., Woldorff M.G. The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task. Cognition 2010, 117:341-347.
28. Locke H.S., Braver T.S. Motivational influences on cognitive control: Behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 8:99-112.
29. Lorch R.F., Myers J.L. Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:149-157.
30. Notebaert W., Houtman F., Van Opstal F., Gevers W., Fias W., Verguts T. Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition 2009, 111:275-279.
31. Notebaert W., Verguts T. Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1256-1260.
32. Praamstra P., Flat F.M. Failed suppression of direct visuomotor activation in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:31-43.
33. Satterthwaite T.D., Ruparel K., Loughead J., Elliott M.A., Gerraty R.T., Calkins M.E., et al. Being right is its own reward: Load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth. NeuroImage 2012, 61:723-729.
34. Schlaghecken F., Martini P. Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38:272-278.
35. Silvetti M., Seurinck R., Verguts T. Value and prediction error in medial frontal cortex: integrating the single-unit and systems levels of analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2011, 5:75.
36. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:1974-1976.
37. Skinner B.F. Science and human behavior 1953, Macmillan, New York.
38. Stürmer B., Nigbur R., Schacht A., Sommer W. Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:335.
39. Thorndike E.L. Animal intelligence 1911, Macmillan, New York.
40. Ullsperger M., Bylsma L.M., Botvinick M.M. The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 5:467-472.
41. van Steenbergen H., Band G.P.H., Hommel B. Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science 2009, 20:1473-1477.
42. van Steenbergen H., Band G.P.H., Hommel B. In the mood for adaptation: How affect regulates conflict-driven control. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1629-1634.
43. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review 2008, 115:518-525.
44. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:252-257.
45. Waszak F., Pholulamdeth V. Episodic S-R bindings and emotion: About the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus-response associations. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 194:489-494.
46. Zelenski J.M., Larsen R.J. Susceptibility to affect: a comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality 1999, 67:761-791.