Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 505-511

  Akçay, Çaǧlar ^a   Hazeltine, Eliot ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention and executive control; Cognitive and attentional control; Decision making; Repetition effects

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; LEARNING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 80052887300     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0084-y     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Feature-overlap and conflict monitoring: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 742-748.
2. Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2008). Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 958-973.
3. Blais, C., Robidoux, S., Risko, E. F., & Besner, D. (2007). Item specific adaptation and the conflict monitoring hypothesis: A computational model. Psychological Review, 114, 1076-1086.
4. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
5. Bugg, J. M. (2008). Opposing influences on conflict-adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1217-1227.
6. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374-380.
7. Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Seperate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage, 35, 940-948.
8. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
10. Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18, 1040-1043.
11. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humpreys, G. (2010). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 147-161.
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
13. Hazeltine, E., Lightman, E., Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2011). The boundaries of sequential modulations: Evidence for set-level control. Manuscript under review
14. Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
15. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
16. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
17. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffman, J. (2006). Evidence for taskspecific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806.
18. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205.
19. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
20. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
21. Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000). Banishing the control homunculus. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2007). Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1256-1260.
23. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071-1080.
24. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
25. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
26. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115, 518-525.
27. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644-667.