Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 107-116

  Mayr, Ulrich ^a   Bryck, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846389308     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0039-x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Switching intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV, (pp. 421-452). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
2. Awh, E., Sgarlata, A. M., Kliestik, J. (2005). Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: Online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (2), 192-206.
3. Bryck, R. L., Mayr, U. (2005). On the role of verbalization during task-set selection: Switching or serial order control? Memory and Cognition 33 (4), 611-623
4. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 218-228.
5. Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research. This issue
6. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
7. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89.
8. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 476-490.
9. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
10. Marczinski, C. A., Milliken, B., & Nelson, S. (2003). Aging and repetition effects: Separate specific and nonspecific influences. Psychology and Aging, 18, 780-790.
11. Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96-109.
12. Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. B. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31 (2), 337-350.
13. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
14. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
15. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
16. Meiran, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Monsell, S. (2003) Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
18. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
19. Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86-102.
20. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 566-582
21. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
22. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
23. Wenke, D., Gaschler R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research. This issue