Cue-task associations in task switching

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 762-769

  Gade, Miriam ^a,b   Koch, Iring ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b SISSA   (Italy)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34249067905     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701268005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Altmann, E. M. (2004). The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory of Cognition, 32, 153-163.
2. Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2006). The role of rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task-switching paradigm [Electronic version]. Psychological Research.
3. Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., & Koch, I. (2006). Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure [Electronic version]. Psychological Research.
4. Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Exp. Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1474-1486.
5. Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433-444.
6. Logan, G. D. (1988). Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
7. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever Homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Exp. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
8. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006). Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Exp. Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 347-363.
9. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
10. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task set selection cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
11. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1424.
12. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
13. Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. (2006). Can the explicit taskcuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process. Journal of Exp. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493-516.
14. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Exp. Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
15. Rubin, O., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous influence on task-set activation in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1033-1146.
16. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching a task: A shortterm priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367.
17. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.