Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Schmidt, James R ^a   Weissman, Daniel H ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONGRUENCY SEQUENCE EFFECT; CONTINGENCY LEARNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; FEATURE REPETITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904262968     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102337     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Stroop JR (1935) Studies on interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18: 643-662.
2. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16: 143-149.
3. Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51: 300-304.
4. Botvinick MM, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen KD (1999) Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402: 179-181.
5. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen 121: 480-506.
6. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624-652. (Pubitemid 33604139)
7. Dreisbach G, Fischer R (2012) Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain Cogn 78: 94-98.
8. Fritz J, Dreisbach G (2013) Conflicts as aversive signals: Conflict priming increases negative judgments for neutral stimuli. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 13: 311-317.
9. Hommel B, Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2004) A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol Res 68: 1-17. (Pubitemid 40549613)
10. Mayr U, Awh E, Laurey P (2003) Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat Neurosci 6: 450-452. (Pubitemid 36514691)
11. Schmidt JR, De Houwer J (2011) Now you see it, now you don't: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychol 138: 176-186.
12. Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald AWIII, Cho RY, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303: 1023-1026. (Pubitemid 38209708)
13. Ullsperger M, Bylsma LM, Botvinick MM (2005) The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 5: 467-472.
14. Schmidt JR, Crump MJC, Cheesman J, Besner D (2007) Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control. Conscious Cogn 16: 421-435. (Pubitemid 46874206)
15. Schmidt JR (2013) Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychon B Rev 20: 615-630.
16. Mordkoff JT (2012) Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation. Psychon B Rev 19: 750-757.
17. Kunde W, Wühr P (2006) Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Mem Cogn 34: 356-367.
18. Kane MJ, Engle RW (2003) Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 132: 47-70. (Pubitemid 37170598)
19. Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J, Humphreys G (2010) Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition 114: 338-347.
20. Mayr U, Awh E (2009) The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res 73: 794-802.
21. Torres-Quesada M, Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J (2013) Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychol 142: 203-210.
22. Jiménez L, Méndez A (2012) It is not what you expect: Dissociating conflict adaptation from expectancies in a Stroop task. J Exp Psychol Human 39: 271-284.
23. Kim S, Cho YS (2014) Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning. Acta Psychol 149: 60-68.
24. Lee Y, Cho YS (2013) Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: Evidence for dimension-specific modulation. Acta Psychol 144: 617-627.
25. Nieuwenhuis S, Stins JF, Posthuma D, Polderman TJC, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJ (2006) Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Mem Cogn 6: 1260-1272. (Pubitemid 46044216)
26. Brainard DH (1997) The Psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
27. Duthoo W, Wühr P, Notebaert W (2013) The hot-hand fallacy in cognitive control: Repetition expectancy modulates the congruency sequence effect. Psychon B Rev 20: 798-805.
28. Freitas AL, Bahar M, Yang S, Bahar R (2007) Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychol Sci 18: 1040-1043.
29. Egner T, Delano M, Hirsch J (2007) Separate conflict-specific control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage 35: 940-948. (Pubitemid 46400544)
30. Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J, Humphreys G (2010) Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. J Exp Psychol Human 36: 147-161.
31. Wendt M, Kluwe RH, Peters A (2006) Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. J Exp Psychol Human 32: 644-667. (Pubitemid 44195473)
32. Hazeltine E, Lightman E, Schwarb H, Schumacher EH (2011) The boundaries of sequential modulations: Evidence for set-level control. J Exp Psychol Human 37: 1898-1914.
33. Notebaert W, Verguts T (2007) Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression approach. J Exp Psychol Human 33: 1256-1260.
34. MacDonald AW, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288: 1835-1838. (Pubitemid 30399023)
35. Sheth SA, Mian MK, Patel SR, Asaad WF, Williams ZM, Dougherty DD, Bush G, Eskandar EN (2004) Human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons mediate ongoing behavioural adaptation. Nature 488: 218-221.
36. Cabeza R, Nyberg L (1997) Imaging cognition: An empirical review of PET studies with normal subjects. J Cogn Neurosci 9: 1-26. (Pubitemid 27152046)
37. Grandjean J, D'Ostilio K, Fias W, Phillips C, Balteau E, et al. (2013) Exploration of the mechanisms underlying the ISPC effect: Evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging data. Neuropsychologia 51: 1040-1049.
38. Blais C, Verguts T (2012) Increasing set size breaks down sequential congruency: Evidence for an associative locus of cognitive control. Acta Psychol 141: 133-139.
39. Lamers MJM, Roelofs A (2011) Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict. Q J Exp Psychol 64: 1056-1081.
40. Verbruggen F, Notebaert W, Liefooghe B, Vandierendonck A (2006) Stimulusand response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychon B Rev 13: 328-333. (Pubitemid 44412018)
41. Los SA (1999) Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for cost in switching between computational processes. J Exp Psychol Human 25: 3-23.
42. Los SA (1999) Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs. Acta Psychol 103: 173-205.
43. Kinoshita S, Mozer MC, Forster KI (2011) Dynamic adaptation to history of trial difficulty explains the effect of congruency proportion on masked priming. J Exp Psychol Gen 140: 622-636.
44. Schmidt JR (2013) Temporal learning and list-level proportion congruency: Conflict adaptation or learning when to respond? PLOS ONE 8: e0082320.