Subliminal priming of intentional inhibition

Cognition

Volumn 130, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 255-265

  Parkinson, Jim ^a   Haggard, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Go NoGo; Inhibition; Intention; Priming; Volition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; EXCITATION; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTENTION; MALE; VOLITION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890286090     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aarts H., Custers R., Wegner D.M. On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Consciousness and Cognition 2005, 14(3):439-458. 10.1016/j.concog.2004.11.001.
2. Aron A.R. From reactive to proactive and selective control: Developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biological Psychiatry 2011, 69(12):e55-e68. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024.
3. Augustine, St. (2006). In M. P. Foley (Ed.), Confessions (F. J. Sheed, Trans.). Hackett: Indianapolis.
4. Bargh J.A., Chen M., Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71(2):230-244.
5. Baumeister R.F., Masicampo E.J., Vohs K.D. Do conscious thoughts cause behavior?. Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62(1):331-361. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131126.
6. Blankenburg F., Taskin B., Ruben J., Moosmann M., Ritter P., Curio G., Villringer A. Imperceptible stimuli and sensory processing impediment. Science 2003, 299(5614):1864. 10.1126/science.1080806.
7. Boy F., Husain M., Singh K.D., Sumner P. Supplementary motor area activations in unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 206(4):441-448. 10.1007/s00221-010-2417-x.
8. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
9. Brass M., Haggard P. The what, when, whether model of intentional action. The Neuroscientist 2008, 14(4):319-325. 10.1177/1073858408317417.
10. Dehaene S., Artiges E., Naccache L., Martelli C., Viard A., Schürhoff F., et al. Conscious and subliminal conflicts in normal subjects and patients with schizophrenia: The role of the anterior cingulate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003, 100(23):13722-13727.
11. Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C.-L., Cleeremans A. Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind?. PLoS One 2012, 7(1):e29081. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081.
12. Eimer M. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101(2):293-313.
13. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(6):1737-1747.
14. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101(2-3):267-291.
15. Filevich E., Kühn S., Haggard P. Intentional inhibition in human action: The power of "no". Neuroscience & Biobehavioural Reviews 2012, 36(4):1107-1118.
16. Fleming S.M., Mars R.B., Gladwin T.E., Haggard P. When the brain changes its mind: flexibility of action selection in instructed and free choices. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(10):2352-2360. 10.1093/cercor/bhn252.
17. Hughes G., Velmans M., De Fockert J. Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(6):1258-1269. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x.
18. Kane R. Freedom, responsibility, and will-setting. Philosophical Topics 1996, 24(2):67-90.
19. Kane R. The significance of free will 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
20. Kleiner M., Brainard D., Pelli D., Ingling A., Murray R., Broussard C. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception 2007, 36(14):1.1-16.
21. Leuthold H., Kopp B. Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science 1998, 9(4):263-269.
22. Libet B., Gleason C.A., Wright E.W., Pearl D.K. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 1983, 106(3):623-642.
23. Lien M.-C., Ruthruff E. Inhibition of task set: Converging evidence from task choice in the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15(6):1111-1116. 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1111.
24. Lingnau A., Vorberg D. The time course of response inhibition in masked priming. Perception & psychophysics 2005, 67(3):545-557.
25. Linser K., Goschke T. Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control. Cognition 2007, 104(3):459-475. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.009.
26. Lleras A., Enns J.T. Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133(4):475-493. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.475.
27. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B., Davis K.A. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10(2):276-291.
28. Mayr U. Conflict, consciousness, and control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(4):145-148. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.004.
29. Neumann O., Klotz W. Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification. Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing 1994, 123-150. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US. C.A. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
30. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV 1986, 1-18. Plenum Press, New York, US. R. Davidson, R. Schwartz, D. Shapiro (Eds.).
31. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442. 10.1163/156856897X00366.
32. Poljac E., Yeung N. Dissociable neural correlates of intention and action preparation in voluntary task switching. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 10.1093/cercor/bhs326.
33. Sato A. Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition 2009, 110(1):74-83. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.011.
34. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Masked prime stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11(3):463-468.
35. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaśkowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135(3):484-494. 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.484.
36. Schlaghecken F., Rowley L., Sembi S., Simmons R., Whitcomb D. The negative compatibility effect: A case for self-inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3(1-2):227-240. 10.2478/v10053-008-0027-y.
37. Schurger A., Pereira F., Treisman A., Cohen J.D. Reproducibility distinguishes conscious from nonconscious neural representations. Science 2009, 327(5961):97-99. 10.1126/science.1180029.
38. Sebanz N., Lackner U. Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16(4):859-876. 10.1016/j.concog.2006.08.002.
39. Shallice T., Burgess P. The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 1996, 351(1346). 1405-11- discussion 1411-2. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0124.
40. Simmonds D.J., Pekar J.J., Mostofsky S.H. Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(1):224-232. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.015.
41. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81(1):174-176.
42. van Gaal S., Ridderinkhof K.R., Fahrenfort J.J., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A.F. Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(32):8053-8062. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1278-08.2008.
43. van Gaal S., Ridderinkhof K.R., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A.F. Unconscious activation of the prefrontal No-Go network. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(11):4143-4150. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2992-09.2010.
44. van Gaal S., Ridderinkhof K.R., van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Lamme V.A.F. Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(4):1129-1139. 10.1037/a0013551.
45. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(11):418-424. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005.
46. Verleger R., Jaśkowski P., Aydemir A., van der Lubbe R.H.J., Groen M. Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133(4):494-515. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.494.
47. Handbook of self-regulation 2013, Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. K.D. Vohs, R.F. Baumeister (Eds.).
48. Wenke D., Fleming S.M., Haggard P. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition 2010, 115(1):26-38. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016.
49. Yeung N. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: The elusive homunculus escapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36(2):348-362. 10.1037/a0017894.