Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 644-667

  Wendt, Mike ^a   Kluwe, Rainer H ^a   Peters, Alexandra ^a  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict; Feature integration; Selective processing; Simon effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33746869985     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological. Review, 108, 624-652.
2. Botvinick, M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulated cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
3. Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection for action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179-181.
4. Carter, C. S., Macdonald, A. M., Botvinick, M., Ross, L. L., Stenger, V. A., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 1944-1948.
5. De Jong, R. (1997). Compatibility effects on performance and executive control in dynamic task settings. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 223-239). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flanker task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101-118.
9. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
10. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologies, 39, 427-439.
11. Hommel, B. (1993a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
12. Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
13. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
14. Hommel, B. (1995). Conflict versus misguided search as explanation of S-R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologies 89, 37-51.
15. Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
16. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
17. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483-521.
18. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997). Theoretical issues on stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
20. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
21. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
22. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
23. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205.
24. Kunde, W. & Wühr, P. (in press). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition.
25. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
26. MacDonald, A. W., III, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
27. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
28. Marble, J. G., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1515-1533.
29. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
30. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
31. Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 193.
32. Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 143-156.
33. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task: Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170-184.
34. Pardo, J. V., Pardo, Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 87, 256-259.
35. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
36. Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627-1631.
37. Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1998). Attention, self regulation, and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 353, 1915-1927.
38. Ridderinkhof, R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 494-519). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umiltà, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353-1364.
40. Ruff, C. C., Woodward, T. S., Laurens, K. R., & Liddle, P. F. (2001). The role of the anterior cingulated cortex in conflict processing: Evidence from reverse Stroop interference. NeuroImage, 14, 1150-1158.
41. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
42. Simon, J. R., & Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The "Stroop effect" vs. the "Simon effect." Acta Psychologica, 73, 159-170.
43. Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433-435.
44. Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657-1661.
45. Smith, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435-439.
46. Stoffels, E. J. (1996). On stage robustness and response selection: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 91, 67-88.
47. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
48. Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 35-44.
49. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
50. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Cross-modal re-mapping influences the Simon effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 18-23.
51. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
52. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (in press). The conflict-adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience.
53. Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A., & de Labra, C. (2002). Does stimulus-driven response activation underlie the Simon effect? In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 474-493). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120, 307-326.
55. Wühr, P. (2004). Sequential modulations of logical-receding operations in the Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 5, 98-108.
56. Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282-288.