Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 307-326

  Verbruggen, Frederick ^a   Liefooghe, Baptist ^a   Notebaert, Wim ^a   Vandierendonck, André ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Distractor interference; Response inhibition; Simon task; Spatial stroop task; Stop signal paradigm

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 26844534994     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. G.P.H. Band M.W. van der Molen & G.D. Logan Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure Acta Psychologica 112 2003 105-142
2. M. Botvinick L.E. Nystrom K. Fissell C.S. Carter & J.D. Cohen Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex Nature 402 1999 179-181
3. B. Burle C.A. Possamai F. Vidal M. Bonnet & T. Hasbroucq Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis Psychological Research 66 2002 324-342
4. J.L. Craft & J.R. Simon Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 1970 415-420
5. R. De Jong C.C. Liang & E. Lauber Conditional and unconditional automaticity - A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 20 1994 731-750
6. B.A. Eriksen & C.W. Eriksen Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task Perception & Psychophysics 16 1974 143-149
7. C.W. Eriksen & B.A. Eriksen Target redundancy in visual-search - Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing Perception & Psychophysics 26 1979 195-205
8. G. Gratton M.G.H. Coles & E. Donchin Optimizing the use of information - Strategic control of activation of responses Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 121 1992 480-506
9. B. Hommel The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap Psychological Research 55 1993 280-290
10. B. Hommel No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes Perception & Psychophysics 58 1996 102-110
11. B. Hommel Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung 59 1997 248-260
12. B. Hommel R.W. Proctor & K.-P. Vu A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task Psychological Research 68 2004 1-17
13. J.G. Kerns J.D. Cohen A.W. Macdonald R.Y. Cho V.A. Stenger & C.S. Carter Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control Science 303 2004 1023-1026
14. S. Kornblum T. Hasbroucq & A. Osman Dimensional overlap - Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy Psychological Review 97 1990 253-270
15. A.F. Kramer D.G. Humphrey J.F. Larish G.D. Logan & D.L. Strayer Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention Psychology and Aging 9 1994 491-512
16. J.S. Lappin & C.W. Eriksen Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 1966 805-811
17. H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49 1971 467-477
18. X. Liu M.T. Banich B.L. Jacobson & J.L. Tanabe Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI Neuroimage 22 2004 1097-1106
19. G.D. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user's guide to the stop signal paradigm In D. Dagenbach & T.H. Carr (Eds.) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language 1994 Academic Press San Diego 189-239
20. G.D. Logan & W.B. Cowan On the ability to inhibit thought and action - A theory of an act of control Psychological & Review 91 1984 295-327
21. G.D. Logan & D.E. Irwin Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 2000 107-112
22. Logan, G. D., Kantowitz, B. H., & Riegler, G. L. (1986). On the ability to stop selectively: Mechanisms of response interdiction in choice reaction time. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University
23. G.D. Logan R.J. Schachar & R. Tannock Impulsivity and inhibitory control Psychological Science 8 1997 60-64
24. U. Mayr E. Awh & P. Laurey Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control Nature Neuroscience 6 2003 450-452
25. W. Notebaert E. Soetens & A. Melis Sequential analysis of a Simon task - Evidence for a attentional shift account Psychological Research 65 2001 170-184
26. K.R. Ridderinkhof A dual-route processing architecture for stimulus-response correspondence effects In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility 1997 Elsevier Amsterdam 119-131
27. K.R. Ridderinkhof Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.) Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and performance vol. XIX 2002 Oxford Press Oxford 494-519
28. K.R. Ridderinkhof G.P.H. Band & G.D. Logan A study of adaptive behavior: Effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one's actions Acta Psychologica 101 1999 315-337
29. K.R. Ridderinkhof M.W. van der Molen & T.R. Bashore Limits on the application of additive factors logic - Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing Acta Psychologica 90 1995 29-48
30. S. Rubichi R. Nicoletti & C. Umilta Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes Psychological Research 69 2005 167-178
31. J.R. Simon E. Acosta S.P. Mewaldt & C.R. Speidel The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing Perception & Psychophysics 19 1976 16-22
32. Stevens, M., Lammertyn, J., Verbruggen, F., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods
33. B. Stürmer H. Leuthold E. Soetens H. Schröter & W. Sommer Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 28 2002 1345-1363
34. W. van den Wildenberg & M.W. van der Molen Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 87 2004 201-220
35. F. Verbruggen B. Liefooghe & A. Vandierendonck The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and the Stroop task Acta Psychologica 116 2004 21-37
36. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
37. A.B. Vivas & L.J. Fuentes Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 2001 315-323
38. K.P. Vu & R.W. Proctor The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of dimensions Perception & Psychophysics 64 2002 815-828
39. Wühr, P., (in press). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review