A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task

Psychological Research

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-17

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a,b   Proctor, Robert W ^c   Vu, Kim Phuong L ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 3042726693     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). London: Guilford Press.
2. De Jong, R. (1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 88, 187-207.
3. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
4. Dutzi, I. B., & Hommel, B. (2003). Spontaneous but goal-dependent binding of actions and their effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
6. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
7. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
8. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
9. Hommel, B. (1998a). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
10. Hommel, B. (1998b). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
11. Hommel, B. (1998c). Binding between perceptual objects and action plans: the temporal dynamics of event-file construction. Presentation on the 10th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. Jerusalem, September.
12. Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Hommel, B. (2003). Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2003). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
16. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
17. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
18. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
19. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli. I. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688-714.
20. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
21. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations. I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
22. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
23. Marble, J. G., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1515-1533.
24. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
25. Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks [Abstract]. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 193.
26. Neumann, O., & Prinz, W. (1987). Kognitive Antezedenzien von Willkürhandlungen [Cognitive antecedents of voluntary actions]. In H. Heckhausen, & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), Jenseits des Rubikon: der Wille in den Humanwissenschaften (pp. 195-215). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
27. Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 143-156.
28. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task-evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170-184.
29. Praamstra, P., Kleine, B.-U., & Schnitzler, A. (1999). Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 10, 3671-3674.
30. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.) Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 443-473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Marble, J. G. (2003). Mixing location-relevant and irrelevant tasks: spatial compatibility effects eliminated by stimuli that share the same spatial codes. Visual Cognition, 10, 15-50.
32. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
33. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
35. Stoffels, E. J. (1996). On stage robustness and response selection routes: further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 91, 67-88.
36. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1998). Strategische Effekte und kurzfristige Modulationen im Simon-Paradigma [Strategie effects and short-term modulations in the Simon paradigm] [Abstract]. In H. Lachnit, A. Jacobs, & F. Rösler (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie: Abstracts der 40. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (pp. 365-366). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
37. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
38. Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology,35, 366-371.
39. Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A., & de Labra, C. (2002). Does stimulus-driven response activation underlie the Simon effect? In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 474-493). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Elimination and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects with mixed mappings. Manuscript submitted for publication.